Fighter of the Nightman
- Chicago, IL
My apparently unique brain power allows me to worry about multiple topics at the same time!You just worry about the football uniforms man!
My apparently unique brain power allows me to worry about multiple topics at the same time!You just worry about the football uniforms man!
Well thought out post and I wish we would have gotten something out of Petro? But, most of the reason we are not getting much out of Petro is because KW is simply so much better than anything (frankly than ever?) we have seen out of a Freshman?True, but we're heading into the grind of the schedule now, where every coach knows the other's tendencies, every team is physical and they'll be playing in some pretty daunting environments, which is where fatigue sets in. Fatigue causes a lot of problems that come in the form of turnovers, missed assignments, getting beat in transition, missed free throws and..........silly fouls, generally of the slap variety.
Boswell, I trust. Wagler, I don't. It simply comes down to experience.
We haven't had a game yet where the backcourt, as a unit, picked up early foul trouble. If we were to get into a situation where Boswell gets 2 and Wagler gets 2 with 5 minutes to go in the first half of a road game.....where do you go? Rolled ankles happen. Taking an elbow to the face playing MSU happens(frequently).
You can't run these guys out there 35+ minutes a night and think that it's not going to come back and cause issues on multiple occasions.
You're taking the "so far, so good" approach, which isn't a good take. Somebody needs to step up and be able to suck up some meaningful minutes in the backcourt. I think that this ship has sailed and we're going to have to default to Lee and try and survive offensively? It looks like that's the way Brad is leaning.
We have a very unique roster in which 2 thru 5 are interchangeable. There's an answer on the roster for a multitude of occurrences. At the 1.....it's the complete opposite.
In the grand scheme of things, I trust Boswell to know how to fully navigate a game, in all aspects, in all situations because he's done it a 60+ times at the highest of levels. He was flat out phenomenal for us the second half of last year.
Wagler hasn't earned that trust yet and no rational human should expect him to be at that level of having that cool, calm, composed demeanor in the midst of chaos. If we're asking him to haul 35+ minutes a night for the next 2 1/2 months and produce at a level where we're expecting him to bring us home in games....it's an irrational and unreasonable ask.
I think that most looked at the roster before the season started and saw trouble at the 1. Petrovic completely flaming out was never really a consideration. Now that it's becoming a reality....every coach in the conference is going to have a game plan of going right at the guards because if there's foul trouble, as of now, we don't have an obvious choice to turn to.
I'm with you on wanting there to be a few set plays. Crunch time is one use. Calming the team is another. There have been multiple games this season where we threw away back to back possessions because the team was rattled. Calling a set play as they come up the court is a way to reintroduce discipline and let them calm down. They are executing a well known path. Everything is normal and okay.I played college basketball, I understand what Iām watching
Look I donāt think Iām being out of line by not getting all excited we scored 90 on Southern, that isnāt my point.
I will die on the hill that we wonāt succeed shooting 34 threes a night and that we need more set plays to rely on in crunch time and out of dead ball situations. Iād like to see some of those at least attempted against a team like Southern that we can pull out against MSU, Purdue or whoever we play in the NCAA tournament.
At the end of the day defense and rebounding is what will make this team succeed and thatās been much much better the last two games.
Mirk was standing and watching. I don't know whether BU wanted him crashing the boards or back on defense. Standing and watching isn't the answer.This was right after an offensive rebound and put-back by Mirk. What was Underwood angry about?
I'm with you on wanting there to be a few set plays. Crunch time is one use. Calming the team is another. There have been multiple games this season where we threw away back to back possessions because the team was rattled. Calling a set play as they come up the court is a way to reintroduce discipline and let them calm down. They are executing a well known path. Everything is normal and okay.
This team currently has a better offensive efficiency than our ā05 team (by a lot). In fact, itās currently our most efficient offense in KenPom history.I played college basketball, I understand what Iām watching
Look I donāt think Iām being out of line by not getting all excited we scored 90 on Southern, that isnāt my point.
I will die on the hill that we wonāt succeed shooting 34 threes a night and that we need more set plays to rely on in crunch time and out of dead ball situations. Iād like to see some of those at least attempted against a team like Southern that we can pull out against MSU, Purdue or whoever we play in the NCAA tournament.
At the end of the day defense and rebounding is what will make this team succeed and thatās been much much better the last two games.
I'll rephrase. I wish Illinois ran set plays more often, e.g. when the team is rattled as a calming method.Where does this delusion that Illinois does not run any set plays come from? Sure, there is a lot of ISO stuff for certain guys because it is effective. But, its impossible to have realistic discussions when statements are so extreme/absolute (ie, Illinois NEVER runs set plays, which is obviously not true).
Here's where I feel differently. The aspects of basketball that can be improved through game rep include shooting, decision making/passing, and cohesiveness with teammates. They do not include effort, attitude, and character. The main issues that we've seen with Mihailo every time he's gotten an opportunity to play are not issues that improve with increased playing time. When Brad yanked Mihailo immediately in the first half of this game, the issue wasn't the errant pass. All players turn the ball over occasionally (although Mihailo definitely has been more casual with the ball than most). The issue was the loafing back on defense...the lack of any sort of desire to make the subsequent scoring play more difficult for our opponents with effort.Agree at this point.
Glass half full, though.
Petrovic and Lee were injured/ out of practice for quite some time. Missed month+ I think. Now school is out on break, and healthy, plenty of time to practice. Need game reps to keep improving. Both new to college ball. Get some minutes, learn, cut down mistakes, repeat. Schedule will change in the new year- games every 3/4 days. Will need contributions- some days KW and KB will need a break.
I was surprised to see him get back in the game at all TBH.After that turnover in the first half Petro had a chance to run back and try to contest. He just jogged back and chose not to. It was so obvious he was going to get pulled after that. Wtf was he thinking? How can he not know by now he has to hustle on defense?
Yeah I like the idea of players just running action on their own. Makes us less predictable.Just Google sets vs actions in basketball
Yep. Everything we do is a read based on how the defense reactsYeah I like the idea of players just running action on their own. Makes us less predictable.
Anyone can watch film to deduce set plays and then come up with ways to counter them.
Most of you are totally twisting my words pretending like Iām saying our offense isnāt good or that I think Brad or Tyler is a bad coach. When did I ever say our offense wasnāt good? Oh right, I didnāt.This team currently has a better offensive efficiency than our ā05 team (by a lot). In fact, itās currently our most efficient offense in KenPom history.
But I guess we donāt run enough 2000s style set plays, so itās not very good?
There is no doubt that his body of work over the first 13 games has been nothing short of awesome. He's been more than I think anyone could have expected.I get the point of him being a frosh... but I'm genuinely not sure what else you'd like to see him do? Drop 50?
To me - as a PG, so much of the word "trust" comes down to ball handling. He has 17 total turnovers thru 13 games (with 50 assists). That's more than proving yourself.
This is fair, but it doesnāt mitigate the need for sets when your actions are being blown up or youāre playing against a team that matches up really well against us defensivelyJust Google sets vs actions in basketball
The style is high risk high reward. Maybe we can string a bunch of games together at the right time. My personal concerns have been more about making changes and responding when the style is coming dry. It happens at times.People just donāt like the style so itās not good.
Yep. Everything we do is a read based on how the defense reacts
Well thought out post and I wish we would have gotten something out of Petro? But, most of the reason we are not getting much out of Petro is because KW is simply so much better than anything (frankly than ever?) we have seen out of a Freshman?
I think with these players available at the two āso calledā guard spots KW, KB, JD, AS, and Lee we are āprettyā good.
Remember this also assumes (which is for sure possible) that Ty does not return, as you could slate him in to a āguardā slot?
As far as trusting Wagler, in my 58 years watching the Illini, I am not sure I have ever seen a better freshman? Many good ones, but this kid has āitā. He can play the point, he can get others involved, he rebounds, he can get tough baskets, hit 3ās what canāt he do?
I trust him! And bottom line, most every team that wins it all has a stud one and done superstar (Carmelo type) player, we may just have that in KW? You simply have to ride this kid, he plays so within himself truly amazing what he is doing?
I see what youāre saying, but I think at this point what we got is what we got? I think it might work really well if they can hit 35% from 3 are going to be tough to beat?
fightingillini.com
Pru, how are you feeling since getting back home? Hope things are getting better for ya! ILL!View attachment 45955
View attachment 45956
View attachment 45957
we won by 35........................nuff said.........................next game.............
View attachment 45958View attachment 45958View attachment 45958View attachment 45958
View attachment 45959
View attachment 45960
All I know is I have been watching Illini basketball for almost 60 years, and I am not sure Frankie was āall aroundā as good as this kid. Frankie is probably the best Freshman I can remember until now?Speaking to Keaton having "it", after his lone turnover yesterday he immediately went and made a pretty awesome defensive play to steal the ball right back. The dude just was not going to tolerate his own mistake and had to make up for it. Reminded me a bit of the plays where Kobe would turn it over then hustle back down the court for a chase down block.
Dee or Deron (I think Dee) used to talk about this as well. If he made a turnover, he made it a point to try to get it back. Winning behavior.Speaking to Keaton having "it", after his lone turnover yesterday he immediately went and made a pretty awesome defensive play to steal the ball right back. The dude just was not going to tolerate his own mistake and had to make up for it. Reminded me a bit of the plays where Kobe would turn it over then hustle back down the court for a chase down block.
No thanks, TylerJust Google sets vs actions in basketball