Illinois 91, Michigan 87 2OT Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#401      
It appeared to me we were one Dickinson basket away from losing the game at onee point which he barely missed.
it appeared to me we were

1. A Matt Mayer wide open 3 away from not needing over time
2. A tsj ft away from not needing overtime
3. An Epps away from not needing overtime
4. A few ty rodgers and Coleman Hawkins missed layups/paint shots away from not needing overtime
5. About 10 referee calls away from not needing overtime

It goes both ways. We have successfully executed this game plan for THREE YEARS IN A ROW, and you want to talk about how we almost lost. Michigan is a team of D1 players too. They’re good at basketball. Sometimes games are close. WE WON!
 
#402      

Germanboxers

Fort Wayne, IN
Ummm, Ty is not faster than Nick Anderson, Nick was a much better finisher around the rim, much quicker leaper, much better jump shooter and Ty does not have anything close to the shark mentality yet that Nick had (there were games in '89 that Nick simply would not let them lose)

Other than that - the comparison is valid ;)
This…Nick really was a force of nature on the basketball court when he decided we were not going to lose. I graduated in ’89 and played a couple of games with Nick at IMPE…well, I touched the ball a couple of times anyway. “Nick the Quick” was an absolute stud!! The way the final four game that year ended is so sad. Given Nick’s pedigree for getting any rebound he really wanted, I’m convinced Nick expected The buzzer to sound before the ball hit the rim. Higgins, and Michigan, were EXTREMELY lucky Nick miscalculated the clock because I have no doubt he would have willed us to win in OT. I’m sure that ending hurt him like no other.
 
#403      
it appeared to me we were

1. A Matt Mayer wide open 3 away from not needing over time
2. A tsj ft away from not needing overtime
3. An Epps away from not needing overtime
4. A few ty rodgers and Coleman Hawkins missed layups/paint shots away from not needing overtime
5. About 10 referee calls away from not needing overtime

It goes both ways. We have successfully executed this game plan for THREE YEARS IN A ROW, and you want to talk about how we almost lost. Michigan is a team of D1 players too. They’re good at basketball. Sometimes games are close. WE WON!
The point was Dickinson played extremely well, and Michigan could have easily won
 
Last edited:
#405      

IlliniKat91

Chicago, IL
The point was Dickinson played extremely well, and Michigan could have easily won
Close only counts in horse shoes and hand grenades. The bottom line is that we gutted out a tough win through two overtimes.

I hate how inconsistent this team has been, but I'm hopeful (perhaps foolishly so) that they've keyed into grit. Grit and executing the game plan correctly can carry you in March
 
#406      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky
it appeared to me we were

1. A Matt Mayer wide open 3 away from not needing over time
2. A tsj ft away from not needing overtime
3. An Epps away from not needing overtime
4. A few ty rodgers and Coleman Hawkins missed layups/paint shots away from not needing overtime
5. About 10 referee calls away from not needing overtime

It goes both ways. We have successfully executed this game plan for THREE YEARS IN A ROW, and you want to talk about how we almost lost. Michigan is a team of D1 players too. They’re good at basketball. Sometimes games are close. WE WON!
7ab.gif
 
#408      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky
Close only counts in horse shoes and hand grenades. The bottom line is that we gutted out a tough win through two overtimes.

I hate how inconsistent this team has been, but I'm hopeful (perhaps foolishly so) that they've keyed into grit. Grit and executing the game plan correctly can carry you in March
I just find it hard to understand the nitpickers saying what if ,,,,,,,,,WHEN WE WON THE GAME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

give it a rest guys , both teams messed up chances to win in OT 1 and OT 2.....

we won ......close closed ........Mark VII..................over & out.........
 
#409      
You could say that about someone in every game. Illini won so get over it.
One can say antthing about anyone in any game. I have nothing to get over. Pay attention to the context of the post.
 
#410      
One can say antthing about anyone in any game. I have nothing to get over. Pay attention to the context of the post.

Innocent bystander here, but I think they understood your message perfectly. Do you have a reply? Interested in hearing it.
 
#411      
... interpreting the player on the bench by how he looks. You don't know what he's thinking or feeling. I believe a player is disappointed when he doesn't play as best as he can and contribute and do they look beat on the bench and maybe given up for that moment? yes. Doesn't mean they are giving up on themselves or their teammates? No, I'll need more than a few mins of feeling sorry for themselves to convince me of that.

There are certain players whose temperament is pretty rock-solid throughout. They to project an aura of control and confidence at all times.

But many/most players feelings are like yo-yos. You miss a shot or two... or the Coach yells as you for not getting back on defense... and your mood can quickly sag.

And just as quickly, you hit two in or row or slam a thunder-dunk and you push out your chest way out and scream out a loud war chant and you feel like King of the World. At least for a moment.

Sports is an emotional game both for player and fan. And emotions rise and fall like the waves crashing on Lake Michigan when the North wind is blowing a gale.

More attention needs to be paid to player emotions by coaches. Many coaches are preoccupied with technical aspects of the game and they do not give enough attention to what the emotional temperature is of so many guys at one time. Not necessarily a fault of the coach as there is simply too much to do and too much going on to give this critical aspect of the game the emphasis it deserves.

As a student of the game... I see the need to give this part of the game much more attention. And the benefits of doing that would pay off big time.

The greatest coaches are those who are deeply tuned in to the emotions of player and team. This allows the coach to know how to respond both in the heat of battle and also after the game when someone needs a good heart-to-heart to get themselves right.

This also plays into the overall team-feeling of brotherhood and also Coach acting as father-figure and mentor to the young men who are looking to him for leadership and good direction.

But in general, showing any kind of ‘down’ emotion is not good for two reasons. It emboldens your opposition as them getting into your head. And it sends a bad message to your coach and teammates.

You have to get your head and heart right before you can do anything on the court.
 
#413      
Ummm, Ty is not faster than Nick Anderson, Nick was a much better finisher around the rim, much quicker leaper, much better jump shooter and Ty does not have anything close to the shark mentality yet that Nick had (there were games in '89 that Nick simply would not let them lose)

Other than that - the comparison is valid ;)
I will challenge you on only one thing. "Much Quicker Leaper" I've been watching the Illini Since the the mid 50's. I don't remember ever seeing any Illini player get an offensive rebound on a missed free throw in 4 straight games before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.