Illinois Football Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#377      

mhuml32

Cincinnati, OH
Big difference this year though. He already was suspended and it could get even worse for Michigan at the end of the year with the NCAA. Harbaugh has every reason to leave now.

2020: Harbaugh's going to find another job. He tried but this was Michigan's worst season in a long time. He'll find another opportunity to save face.
2021: This year is different, he provided a major turnaround but this is the ceiling. He beat Ohio State, he won the Big Ten, he made the playoff, but Georgia is in a different class. There's also rumblings he wants to go back to NFL.
2022: He's getting serious interest from the NFL and there is the open NCAA investigation. He wants to get back to the pros.
2023: All of the suspensions are wearing on him, he'll want to get back to the NFL and get out of the NCAA scrutiny.
 
#378      

mhuml32

Cincinnati, OH
I saw all of this knowing there's a chance that Harbaugh actually leaves. Maybe those chances increase if UM wins a national title, but I've come to believe the views on this board of him leaving are more aligned with wish fulfillment than reality.
 
#379      

mhuml32

Cincinnati, OH
Doesn’t look like Rolder’s played much at all. Any chance he portals, esp if Harbaugh leaves?

Just looked this up, he only had 23 snaps this year after getting 5x that as a freshman. That would be intriguing. It's an interesting question about whether Rolder would raise the ceiling of the LB core enough because there's isn't a big need at that position.
 
#384      
I was thinking today about the messed up state of college athletics, and I came up with a hypothetical I want to make sure I'm thinking through correctly.

Let's say we have two identical high school recruits, A and B. They play the same position, same skill level etc. A comes to Illinois, B goes to a similar level program elsewhere. Both redshirt their freshman year while spending time working on strength and conditioning, they progress in both areas about the same. After their freshman seasons, B enters the transfer portal and comes to talk to Illinois. When considering A and B for the following seasons, B is MORE VALUABLE to Illinois than A right? If Illinois takes B onto the team, B can effectively guarantee that he will play for Illinois his redshirt freshman year AND he will either play for Illinois his sophomore year or he will play for no one (as he would have to sit out a year). A cannot make the same promise because he will still have his free transfer available. If both players have strong second years, other schools would have much stronger incentives to poach A than B from Illinois because A could play right away. So if A and B both came and asked for NIL money, it would make sense to offer more to B than A.

Am I missing something? Or has the current system put players at a disadvantage if they commit to the school they want to play for right out of high school? To phrase the question more practically: would Illinois pay Malik Elzy MORE NIL money if he were transferring in from Iowa State after his freshman year than the real Maliz Elzy will get after having played at Illinois his freshman year? Certainly having one year in the system is worth something, probably more valuable at some positions than others, but having the guarantee that the player cannot transfer freely may outweigh that, no?
 
#385      
Insiders, any news at all with JoJo? Just saw his tweet, checked out his profile and no sign of Illinois is the bio (not sure if there ever was though). I hope nothing serious, I like that kid a lot and hope he continues to play here.
 
#387      
I was thinking today about the messed up state of college athletics, and I came up with a hypothetical I want to make sure I'm thinking through correctly.

Let's say we have two identical high school recruits, A and B. They play the same position, same skill level etc. A comes to Illinois, B goes to a similar level program elsewhere. Both redshirt their freshman year while spending time working on strength and conditioning, they progress in both areas about the same. After their freshman seasons, B enters the transfer portal and comes to talk to Illinois. When considering A and B for the following seasons, B is MORE VALUABLE to Illinois than A right? If Illinois takes B onto the team, B can effectively guarantee that he will play for Illinois his redshirt freshman year AND he will either play for Illinois his sophomore year or he will play for no one (as he would have to sit out a year). A cannot make the same promise because he will still have his free transfer available. If both players have strong second years, other schools would have much stronger incentives to poach A than B from Illinois because A could play right away. So if A and B both came and asked for NIL money, it would make sense to offer more to B than A.

Am I missing something? Or has the current system put players at a disadvantage if they commit to the school they want to play for right out of high school? To phrase the question more practically: would Illinois pay Malik Elzy MORE NIL money if he were transferring in from Iowa State after his freshman year than the real Maliz Elzy will get after having played at Illinois his freshman year? Certainly having one year in the system is worth something, probably more valuable at some positions than others, but having the guarantee that the player cannot transfer freely may outweigh that, no?
This is far too simplistic. In your scenario, yes. If you are exactly as good as another guy, you could be better off going somewhere else and transferring to the school you really want. But that makes a lot of assumptions.

Not only would you have to be exactly as good as another guy, you'd both have to be the best on the roster and a starter. You could also look at it from the other side of the coin. Why would I give you more money, you can't transfer without sitting a year, whereas the guy who committed here originally could walk easily. So I'd argue, you need to pay the guy who originally committed more.
 
#389      
This is far too simplistic. In your scenario, yes. If you are exactly as good as another guy, you could be better off going somewhere else and transferring to the school you really want. But that makes a lot of assumptions.

Not only would you have to be exactly as good as another guy, you'd both have to be the best on the roster and a starter. You could also look at it from the other side of the coin. Why would I give you more money, you can't transfer without sitting a year, whereas the guy who committed here originally could walk easily. So I'd argue, you need to pay the guy who originally committed more.
I'm certainly simplifying for the sake of the hypothetical, obviously no two players are exactly equal, but I think the larger point remains. But your point about future NIL is interesting. The player who is transferring in may be able to command more NIL money this year, as he is a more sure bet to stick around in subsequent years. But in those subsequent years, the transfer will likely get less NIL money because they have to sit out if they leave... maybe it all works out in the end, but it seems kind of nuts to me that a team can feel more confident that a transfer player will stick around on their team than a player who committed out of high school. I guess that's just the way it is now... (maybe always was?)
 
#390      
Does Kirk retire?
Hopefully his brand of football.is 10000x more boring then the old bo Ryan Wisconsin swing offense. Actually not taking away from Bo Ryan his brand of basketball is boring but was extremely effective Actually kinda wish wish Brad would throw a couple of his plays out for Rodgers this year.soory wrong thread😅🤣
 
#391      
Cooper visited UI many times. I thought he might be our first commit. There has to be some good linebackers in Illinois for 25.
 
#393      
Cooper visited UI many times. I thought he might be our first commit. There has to be some good linebackers in Illinois for 25.
As far as ILB goes: Rosiek and Odeluga improved tremendously from the start of the season until the finish. Ja. Kreutz showed flashes on ST and limited snaps. Hayden is on the depth chart with a year of learning and so is Hood(injured all year. ) Incoming potential impact player in Baker. That’s a good young base with great potential, but more depth needed.
 
#395      
Didnt he do something stupid, making fun of us on his announcement day? Like we werent good enough for him.
I could only find that he didn't include UM in his final 5 and then committed to them.

I didn't think he was dissing anyone so much as just assumed scum threw a duffle bag of cash large enough to possibly injure him...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.