illinichick
- Ann Arbor, MI
Cool pic I saw on Phair's Twitter
View attachment 2661
Wow, that's impressive. I wonder what those stats looked like for Cubit's staff.
Cool pic I saw on Phair's Twitter
View attachment 2661
Wow, that's impressive. I wonder what those stats looked like for Cubit's staff.
Killer. Lovie's built a killer staff. We're going big game hunting.
Any of the huntees named Cecil? [emoji16]
Not funny. FWIW, I find big game hunting abhorrent. Very little sporting about it. Maybe I shouldn't have used that analogy. Thought everyone would be take it figuratively.
Expect our killer staff to bring in a major upgrade in talent. No more MAC-level kids. 2-3 stars for 3-4 stars. Giant upgrade.
Recruiting: I agree. Looking for a significant talent upgrade to pull us out of the basement of the Power 5.
On-the-field Results: Any chance we get a Harbaugh-like effect in year 1, where Lovie and staff are able to coach 'em up? I do think we have a small hint of returning talent. How about 8-5 with one huge regular season upset and a bowl victory........
Hoping that George is a late bloomer and becomes our GO-TO guy this spring.
My biggest concern is how Garrick McGee does calling plays. I don't think it'll be anywhere near the train wreck that was Beatty/Gonzales in 2012, but given his relative lack of experience in calling plays, I do worry.
My biggest concern is how Garrick McGee does calling plays. I don't think it'll be anywhere near the train wreck that was Beatty/Gonzales in 2012, but given his relative lack of experience in calling plays, I do worry.
I believe he called more plays than people give him credit for. There is no way Louisville pay him over 800K and he has absolutely nothing to do with the play calling. Unfortunately anyone that work with Petrino will never get the full credit they may deserve. I would assume this is why his brother decided to stay put. No matter how much work you do, Petrino will get all the credit. I think McGee is much more prepared than you give him credit for.
"Playcalling" is a vastly, VASTLY overrated part of coaching offense, but regardless, I hope people aren't under the impression that McGee has never been a play caller before. He called the plays during his time as head coach at UAB and also at Northwestern.
The question with McGee isn't his experience with designing and running and gameplanning for an offense, it's his level of success. Other than his couple seasons with Arkansas, his offenses have been just kinda OK.
The pluses for McGee, and why he has been and will continue to get paid so much is obviously recruiting, but also that he fits the bill perfectly as a leader and head coach-type figure for the offensive side of the ball and a yin to Lovie's yang as a younger career college guy. They know and trust one another and yet have very divergent and complementary skill sets.
Recruiting: I agree. Looking for a significant talent upgrade to pull us out of the basement of the Power 5.
On-the-field Results: Any chance we get a Harbaugh-like effect in year 1, where Lovie and staff are able to coach 'em up? I do think we have a small hint of returning talent. How about 8-5 with one huge regular season upset and a bowl victory........
Hoping that George is a late bloomer and becomes our GO-TO guy this spring.
I'm sure McGee is ready. If not, Lovie has been at it a while, I'm sure he would say something if he thinks McGee is making a questionable play call.
I understand your point of view, but I also watched Cubit and others that came before him kill drives with poor play calls or simply just go away from what is working.
I tend to agree with you, but there are times throughout games I just scratch my head and ask why or what is he doing?
Lovie's mishaps with the OC position was a main cause of discontent during his time in Chicago.
I agree. There was a lot left to be desired in last year's play calling. Maybe it's overrated, but it is awfully important.
"Playcalling" is a vastly, VASTLY overrated part of coaching offense, but regardless, I hope people aren't under the impression that McGee has never been a play caller before. He called the plays during his time as head coach at UAB and also at Northwestern.
The question with McGee isn't his experience with designing and running and gameplanning for an offense, it's his level of success. Other than his couple seasons with Arkansas, his offenses have been just kinda OK.
The pluses for McGee, and why he has been and will continue to get paid so much is obviously recruiting, but also that he fits the bill perfectly as a leader and head coach-type figure for the offensive side of the ball and a yin to Lovie's yang as a younger career college guy. They know and trust one another and yet have very divergent and complementary skill sets.
The chess match of football strategy is taking place miles over the head of the fans. That's kind of depressing when you think about it, that we care so much about something we comprehend so little, but it's true. Play calling decisions are made based on observations and deep insider knowledge of tendencies that we are not privy to.
True. The flipside is given the Bears' D and Grossman at QB, it would have been sheer folly to open things up.
The chess match of football strategy is taking place miles over the head of the fans. That's kind of depressing when you think about it, that we care so much about something we comprehend so little, but it's true. Play calling decisions are made based on observations and deep insider knowledge of tendencies that we are not privy to.
The chess match of football strategy is taking place miles over the head of the fans. That's kind of depressing when you think about it, that we care so much about something we comprehend so little, but it's true. Play calling decisions are made based on observations and deep insider knowledge of tendencies that we are not privy to.