But our number helmet is not Alabama. Ours has stars also.
Have to disagree with you there ... say what you want about the Block I, but we have at least added SOME variations to it over the years like double outlines and curving the corners:I’d argue it’s far less generic than just the letter “I”
In my experience the children generally are wrong, simply because of an insufficiently robust longitudinal data set.I can see and comprehend that the numbers on the helmets connote a "no, it's the children who are wrong" provocation against modernity that is always fan catnip for these sorts of things. That is the level on which it's operating.
But as you note, I so strongly associate numbers on the helmets as "Alabama" that I don't comprehend how it acquires that "vintage" appeal.
I am sympathetic to this opinion, but just as the modern take on the Flyin' Illini throwbacks took a classic uniform and actually IMPROVED upon it by updating the sizing of the numbers and lettering and refining the trimming...Two opinions I've never been able to wrap my brain around.
I continue to believe that the 2001-era unis are, taken all together as a coherent whole, the best the program has ever done aesthetically.
People eat nostalgia up, and honestly, our fanbase does it to the extent that we make it nearly impossible for the school to try anything new. We'll always complain when something isn't exactly what it was in our preferred era, whatever that era may be (for most, it's when they became fans). I think the only way to get a new helmet design that this fanbase wouldn't complain about would be to put the Chief logo on it. Even then, there'd still probably be some people not happy. You could probably go find posts made in the last 9 months from a lot of the people saying to make one of these throwbacks permanent saying they love the new current helmet (on here or on any other site). As soon as a nostalgic throwback became an option, people jumped off the Block I support train even if previously, they genuinely liked it.Also, are we all working under the assumption that this represents a vote of no confidence in the Block I helmet, and one of these/something else will be our helmet starting in 2025? Because I certainly am - if not that, it’s a major branding blunder.
I do too.I suppose that is a roundabout way of saying that I actually really like our current uniforms
Yup. This is me when I see the ILLINOIS:It is literally just selecting the bold, italic and underlined options while making sure you have the most boring font available to you in Microsoft Word ... that was our logo!!
BTW... I was wrong last night when I posted that photo of Tony Eason with the gray face mask. It wasn't exclusive. We apparently used orange face masks with this design, too, at some point. It clashes in the photo below. Perhaps a color match would look good.I’m going to be that guy, but the arched ILLINI needs the orange facemask, it’s not the same with the gray.
With modern tech, I can create a better logo in a few minutes that:Meanwhile, I can create the slant Illinois logo in this text box that I use to respond on an Internet message board, lol...
ILLINOIS
It is literally just selecting the bold, italic and underlined options while making sure you have the most boring font available to you in Microsoft Word ... that was our logo!!
I am extra worried about the next generation.....
It was the logo, and everyone knew who it belonged to.Have to disagree with you there ... say what you want about the Block I, but we have at least added SOME variations to it over the years like double outlines and curving the corners:
Meanwhile, I can create the slant Illinois logo in this text box that I use to respond on an Internet message board, lol...
ILLINOIS
It is literally just selecting the bold, italic and underlined options while making sure you have the most boring font available to you in Microsoft Word ... that was our logo!!
"Charming". I agree. Like LALA land UCLA. I want to look tough. I think the numbered helmet does that best.I am biased, but I definitely agree. I will admit that it is not the "coolest" helmet in the world. But I think it is charming and unique. If you see our current uniforms from afar with the "I" helmet, it could be confused from afar as a Syracuse uniform. But there is no mistaking the ILLINOIS helmet for another school, and I think that is something we should embrace.
At that point if we’re having full words on our helmets, just mock up a script Illini and be done with it!I am biased, but I definitely agree. I will admit that it is not the "coolest" helmet in the world. But I think it is charming and unique. If you see our current uniforms from afar with the "I" helmet, it could be confused from afar as a Syracuse uniform. But there is no mistaking the ILLINOIS helmet for another school, and I think that is something we should embrace.
As long as it's the curved Illini I'm in.Also, are we all working under the assumption that this represents a vote of no confidence in the Block I helmet, and one of these/something else will be our helmet starting in 2025? Because I certainly am - if not that, it’s a major branding blunder.
But the point I was making was there is no mistaking the ILLINOIS helmet for any other team in major college football. It is entirely our own. The script Illini is very aesthetically pleasing, but how many other teams use a script logo on their helmets? Countless. My point is that we should embrace a look that is unmistakably our own, and both ILLINOIS and the arched Illini provide that.At that point if we’re having full words on our helmets, just mock up a script Illini and be done with it!
A lot of people were pretty unhappy with the rebranding to the lighter shade of orange, but this side-by-side makes me extra glad we ripped that band-aid off and went for it. It's closer to the orange we've used over the previous century and it contrasts better with our dark blue secondary color.Have to disagree with you there ... say what you want about the Block I, but we have at least added SOME variations to it over the years like double outlines and curving the corners:
Meanwhile, I can create the slant Illinois logo in this text box that I use to respond on an Internet message board, lol...
ILLINOIS
It is literally just selecting the bold, italic and underlined options while making sure you have the most boring font available to you in Microsoft Word ... that was our logo!!
People eat nostalgia up, and honestly, our fanbase does it to the extent that we make it nearly impossible for the school to try anything new. We'll always complain when something isn't exactly what it was in our preferred era, whatever that era may be (for most, it's when they became fans). I think the only way to get a new helmet design that this fanbase wouldn't complain about would be to put the Chief logo on it. Even then, there'd still probably be some people not happy. You could probably go find posts made in the last 9 months from a lot of the people saying to make one of these throwbacks permanent saying they love the new current helmet (on here or on any other site). As soon as a nostalgic throwback became an option, people jumped off the Block I support train even if previously, they genuinely liked it.
If so, then that's a deeply puzzling choice to not use it at all for an entire season. It's a relatively new design and this year - the first of the new B1G - is a significant one in terms of new people encountering the conference and its member schools. I'm not sure how you can be committed to Block I on the helmet and put it in timeout for all of 2024.But I think the Block I will still be the helmet going forward.