I watched the Peoria Manual game. Here are a few thoughts on Da'Monte:
-Great size and athleticism! He's looks to be a legit 6'3 with long arms and a tremendous build. He could probably bulk up and play linebacker - has broad shoulders and a big caboose. Fast baseline to baseline and jumps pretty well. He's not a high flyer necessarily, but his combination of athletic traits will stand out even at the Big Ten level. Really, not much difference physically between DMW and a guy like Paul Scruggs.
-A little more dog in him than I've seen in the past. He was hustling and doing the dirty work most of the game. He scrapped for rebounds, ran the floor, and went after loose balls. I'm hopeful that his motor has improved.
-His shot wasn't going down much, but it gave me hope. His mechanics were inconsistent (arc fluctuated a lot, which indicates an inconsistent release), BUT overall his shot looks pretty, gets nice rotation, and is accurate. He just needs to spend time getting all the pieces to fit together automatically every time he rises up. I think he could eventually evolve into a 3-and-D guy in the vein of DJ Richardson if he doesn't settle in at PG.
-He's not the most creative playmaker. I've seen three of his HS games and 4-5 AAU games and I've only seen a couple of plays where Da'Monte has dropped a really nasty dime or used his ball handling to put the defense on roller skates. He's just not the kind of player who can consistently weave through defenders and find open teammates. In essence, he's no Frank Williams. He IS, however, a fine point-A-to-point-B ball handler. He's got an explosive first step and can blow by a defender and draw help D. I think he'll shoot a lot of free throws over the course of his career here.
-Da'Monte really only played PG at critical junctures of the game. The rest of the time, he essentially played as a stretch-4 who set up initially in the high post and either crashed the glass or flashed to the wing to get iso matchups. If he'd played PG the whole game, Manual would have won, guaranteed. Poor use of his talent. Lots of trips up the floor he didn't touch the ball or was just a cog in the offense. He was sort of the team's focal point, but he wasn't allowed to impose his will. At the same time, he's the kind of kid who naturally defers: he lets the game come to him. It's not so much that he's passive - more like polite. For comparison, I guarantee that Jordan Goodwin would have been meeting the PG at halfcourt and demanding the ball in a tight game. Da'Monte did this on and off, but he just never took over.
-Speaking of Jordan Goodwin, it's never occurred to me before, but he and Da'Monte have a lot of similarities in terms skill and physical ability. They're both good-but-not great ball handlers who project as possible combo guards despite playing a lot of 3/4 in HS. They're both really hard to defend when they get downhill on the break or off the bounce. Similar size (Goodwin's got the edge, but similar builds). Similar athleticism, although I'd give Da'Monte the slight advantage there. Both developing outside shooters (Da'Monte is probably better now - definitely more willing). The main difference I see is that Da'Monte's motor has been questioned while Goodwin plays like man possessed every time he takes the floor. If Da'Monte stays engaged, I think they project similarly. Someone mentioned DWade: I think in terms of style and toolbox that's what I see for DMW for sure and Goodwin to a slightly lesser extent. Obviously the chance that either becomes an NBA all-timer is microscopic, but Wade's game is a fair reference point.
All in all, I think the Frazier-DMW backcourt could be pretty special in a few years!