Corey Evans is saying we will only have ONE fall signee and that is TSJ. Not good.
Getting TSJ would be very good!
But yeah, no bigs would be a bad scene.
Corey Evans is saying we will only have ONE fall signee and that is TSJ. Not good.
2019So is a QG a 2018 or 2019 recruit??
If we think it has ever been anything but ABI, you are kidding yourself. Go back to the year before the Flyin Illini. We lost out on the top 4 in-state prospects that year - LaPhonso went to ND, Anderson went to IU, Acie Earl and Ray Thompson went to Iowa. Andy Kaufmann was a pretty good player, but not in the same class as these guys. I guess we also recruited PJ Bowman that year so that's something. The year before that Marcus Liberty was set to go to Syracuse until persuaded otherwise. the year after Deon was set to go to Iowa until persuaded otherwise. In 1998 we landed Frankie, but lost out on Q, Simmons, Wright, Lance Williams and a few other top guys I can't remember. In 1980 we landed Bontemps and Richardson, but lost on Doc Rivers, Isaiah, Terry Cummings and others.
I'm not sure what it is, but with rare exceptions we really struggle in Chicago with the top guys and get nothing out of St. Louis. You can pretty well list the MCDAA caliber guys on two hands - EJ, Winters, Lib, Deon, Nick, Hamilton, Dee, Richmond. Our bread and butter has been Peoria talent with a few out of staters and underrated guys like Gill, Battle, Augustine and Head. With a better coach Nunn, Hill, etc would have fit the same mold.
What we saw with Liddell is discouraging, but perfectly in keeping with UI history. It would have been more surprising had he chosen Illinois
Anyone got some good news?
Don't really get your point here.
first, when people say "win" I don't necessarily know what they mean. For me, it's returning to the days of the 80s when we consistently were in the top 20.
So the premise is that we win at a lesser level (12 seed level) with middling talent and that helps us land better players that get us in to the 7 seed level which leads to better players that gets us to the 3 seed level. I kinda thought this was obvious but apparently it needs to be spelled out. Of course, maybe I'm totally misinterpreting what people are thinking.
So I think the point of people right now is that we need Underwood to coach the guys he's got to the tourney and that will encourage others of a higher caliber to jump on board.
Further, the idea of eliminating risk is comical. You can reduce it, but you can never eliminate it. At some level, you need a larger number of quality recruits to help outweigh the percentage that will inevitably not pan out. You can reduce that percentage with good coaching and development, but never eliminate it.
Already addressed yesterday in the same discussion. Winning helps but it is not the main determinant, neither is there a gradual linear progression relationship as you present. We not only won, but we won extremely big in the early years of Weber (with Self's players) yet it was evident that recruiting was taking a downward trend. At the same time, there are multiple examples, as presented by many, of coaches who have landed at new schools and got off to very good recruiting starts without this gradual winning progression. At the end, either you are a very good recruiter, or you are not. JMO.
I'm not sure what it is, but with rare exceptions we really struggle in Chicago with the top guys and get nothing out of St. Louis.
I'd argue Henson was a linear progression up. Id say the same for beilein. I'm guessing I'd find a number more if i took the time
Our only chance is to give him time to prove that he can be the long term answer at HC, and he will be gone in a couple years if he can’t.
I do not like their chances with Oscar Tshiebwe or this week’s visitor to Champaign, Quincy Guerrier, so look for Shannon to be the lone fall signee with more work being done during the winter and spring months, similar to last year after they signed Ayo Dosunmu.
https://basketballrecruiting.rivals...rs-dishing-on-pitt-st-john-s-alabama-and-more
Morning fellow Illini fans. I'm feeling pretty positive about Quincy Guerrier. I discovered this morning he actually did put us
in his final three. It seems clear he likes the up and down the floor style of play which bodes well for us. And, the fact that he
may be eligible to play after the first of the year is a huge plus. I like our chances here. Let's hope he has a great visit.
We beat them in 1989 and hopefully we will beat them out in 2018.Syracuse will be hard to beat.
Cuse certainly has us beat on proximity and recent success, but style of play is a big differentiator. Hope that really is a factor for him and he comes in with an open mind.
Morning fellow Illini fans. I'm feeling pretty positive about Quincy Guerrier. I discovered this morning he actually did put us
in his final three. It seems clear he likes the up and down the floor style of play which bodes well for us. And, the fact that he
may be eligible to play after the first of the year is a huge plus. I like our chances here. Let's hope he has a great visit.
We are tired from the last 10 years and when we are right there with big time recruits it feels like we can quickly jump right back to the success of yesteryear. When we miss, it feels like more pain and waiting and have no desire to hurry up and wait. We feel we can and should be back at a very high level.
Agree. From what I've heard from peers out East is shock he hasn't committed to 'Cuse yet. All but a done deal. Gonna take a miracle.An Orangeman
Agree. From what I've heard from peers out East is shock he hasn't committed to 'Cuse yet. All but a done deal. Gonna take a miracle.
Syracuse does still have an open scholarship for this year. I still say, if style of play is his key, he'll be playing at the SFC.And that we have an open spot for him right away to play, does Syracuse?
Sounds like an intelligent, carefully considered use of one of our OV's