Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,902      
If Underwood thought Podz was capable of filling in more, he would have played more often. More often than not, I will take a coaches’ side on playing time decisions. Fans don’t make good coaches.

It's Underwood's decision to make, for sure.

That said, IMO there are coaches who are too stingy with PT for developing players, and don't send enough of a message that guys will be rewarded for the effort and progress that they're making. Every coach has their own opinion on 'win now vs develop talent', and you usually see it play out when the schedule is soft vs conference games. Coaches have intense pressure to win now, I get it. But I do think you need to let guys play and make mistakes in real game situations or it affects them negatively and the coach will ultimately lose more than they gain. Gotta share the sugar. Where coaches draw the line is very personal decision, but I think guys need to understand they can make mistakes and still see the floor. The pressure late in the season and into the post season is different, and guys have to be confident, supported, and prepared for it.

There's no one right answer. Every player is motivated differently, handles pressure differently, and faces different obstacles. That's part of the art of coaching --to keep them hungry, confident, and focused. You really notice it in the post-season, and I think the best coaches and players are good at peaking at the right time.
 
#1,903      
The Portal = Good or Bad for College Basketball? The Good = parity as opportunities for talent to transfer efficiently keeps the blue bloods from dominating year after year; provides mid-majors with opportunities to acquire talent, develop roster depth and make a run. The Bad = crutch is now available as D1 athletes who have never experienced adversity look for greener pastures that don't exist; impacts coaching decisions during the season as coaches lose leverage; roster unrest = more resources allocated toward developing a program.

My take = while I see the benefits of the portal and appreciate them, it is Bad for the game and should be regulated away by the NCAA.
 
#1,904      

CoalCity

St Paul, MN
I actually don't think it was Curbelo as much as it was the offensive and defensive schemes we ran were a poor fit for him as a player. He's a player who has a lot of athleticism but would struggle at times with his positioning, awareness, and off the ball movement. As such, he'll have a hard time dealing with man-to-man (both offense and defense) as he needs additional time and space to operate, so you almost need to build your offense and defense around him to accentuate his talents while limit the weaknesses.

To make it work on defense, you probably need to play him side by side with another 6'10" highly athletic big in some sort of 3-2 zone, split the court in half, have the big on the side where the ball is be the primary defender who's goal is to funnel the player to the secondary defender big for the block. Two of the guards should cover the wings to avoid the open 3, and the 3rd should creep down slightly from the top of the key to both decrease the passing lanes while still allowing time to contest the elbows. This forces teams into midrange jumpers or floaters, or they need movement off the ball to get to the elbows and free throw lines, otherwise they will be either running straight into the secondary big defender or forced into a difficult passing window. In theory you'd want quick big guards for this. On offense, for the 3 guards you'd be looking for 2-3 slasher types who can hit a three at a decent rate and be willing to kick it out to the open shooter if the defense collapses on them when they slash, lob it up to one of the bigs making a run to the basket or just throwing stuff up off the glass looking for one of the bigs to crash and put in the offensive rebound. The only issue with this is that based on what I saw from Omar is that he doesn't seem to have either the nose or awareness to move off the ball to the hoop to crash for offensive rebounds or make himself available for lobs unless it was a set play out of a timeout.

So the question now becomes, if that's a style of play that in theory could bring out Omar's strengths, could Underwood have installed something like that and my answer to that would be only partially. Basically, Kofi is not an optimal pairing with him so changing the overall team defense to 3-2 is just not going to happen. So instead you'd almost need to run 2 teams out there- your 1st team is man-to-man, and your 2nd team is 3-2 zone. Now you'd rather not spend time teaching 2 offensive and defensive philosophies to your entire team, so humorously you'd almost need to make full line changes like you'd see in hockey. Based on those requirements you're looking at something like:

Starters (Man): Kofi, Trent, Damonte, Jacob, Plummer/Curbelo/Goode
2nd team (Zone): Omar, Coleman, RJ, Curbelo, Podz/Plummer/Trent

Where Plummer is your offensive weapon you put in and say try your best on defense, Trent and Andre could probably play either though I wouldn't want to wear Trent out playing much zone. But is this even good enough? Zone will have some defensive issues for sure, you lose flexibility as you'd rather not waste time teaching both systems, and you basically have to run split practices, plus if you have injuries, how do you get players to fill into the new role on the fly?

All in all, this is just too much time spent on what would be your backup big and just too cute and inflexible to be beneficial. Simply put, Omar transferring is clearly the best option for both himself and the Illini as he's just not a good fit for an offense built around Kofi or playing man, and as such we're not a good fit for him either. Definitely makes sense he's leaving and hopefully he can find a better fit for his skillset.
4 out of the 5 players you refer to in your master game plan are gone. Seems like an awful lot of words for a what if scenario that has absolutely no chance of happening.
 
#1,905      
I’m sure Coach Underwood had his reasons to not play Podz. He’s the Head Coach and he calls the shots. Regarding Miller he was very talented but also he was a MIF player and don’t think that didn’t carry some weight.
 
#1,906      
It takes some players time to develop and be effective at the college level. The game is quicker than high school and players are stronger. Remember Roger Powell didn’t play much as a freshman and turned into a solid college player. The hard part is to convince kids their time will come if they work hard
Kendall Gill didn't play much as a freshman and we know how that turned out.
 
#1,907      
The Portal = Good or Bad for College Basketball? The Good = parity as opportunities for talent to transfer efficiently keeps the blue bloods from dominating year after year; provides mid-majors with opportunities to acquire talent, develop roster depth and make a run. The Bad = crutch is now available as D1 athletes who have never experienced adversity look for greener pastures that don't exist; impacts coaching decisions during the season as coaches lose leverage; roster unrest = more resources allocated toward developing a program.

My take = while I see the benefits of the portal and appreciate them, it is Bad for the game and should be regulated away by the NCAA.

Your good is not accurate. UNC got Brady Manek and Dawson Garcia as transfers, who were both stars on other good P5 schools. Manek could be viewed as their best player, definitely in their top 3. Kansas picked up Remy Martin from Arizona State who was their leading scorer in 3 of their tournament games. Kentucky picked up Tshiebwe, who was their best player from West Virginia. Baylor's top 2 scorers are transfers their #2 guy being at Georgetown and Arizona first. Not a blue blood but 2 of Auburn's top players are transfers one from Georgia one from UNC. Where would Miami be without Charlie Moore or McGusty (great name for a hurricane player btw)? The list goes on and on. But the fact is, kids now know have a great season and you can end up almost anywhere you want.

Now your team can benefit too. We would have probably really struggled without Plummer this year. Dainja could prove to be a key player in the future.

However, as a whole, I hate these free transfer rules. Transfers need to occur. Some kids just find themselves unhappy and need to get out. That's fine. Sometimes you find that you aren't going to get PT and need a new team, also fine. But it is now flat out free agency. People on here are bemoaning the loss of favorite players, that will now be common place. We had a Fr starter leave for pete's sakes. So those transfers can hurt you as much as help you.

If you look at these high school kids, I've been utterly baffled that they will go to 3 or 4 schools in their high school career. Do the parents only care about basketball? do they not want to be a part of their kids lives during some pretty crazy years? are they moving with them from school to school? Regardless, these kids are bouncing from high school to high school looking for that best offer. Do we honestly not think that will happen at the college level now?

Don't get attached to players. Don't look forward to seeing a guy grow and become great as an upper classman. Heck, a coach that can develop players loses value, because you don't need to develop anymore. If they don't come in ready to play, just poach an upperclassmen from someone else.
 
#1,908      

Illini in OC

In. The. Alley.
Kendall Gill didn't play much as a freshman and we know how that turned out.
uh, yes please...
1648997655091.png
 
#1,909      

ginabackes00

CrazedUIFan
Maybe it’s best to say the staff and player are reevaluating playing time and what’s best for the player overall. Sometimes it’s not their skillset, i.e. Curbelo, and sometimes it’s game time on the court. As we continue to improve recruiting and look to improve through the portal, we should see two to three transfers a year, the new norm.
 
#1,911      

altgeld88

Arlington, Virginia
You know what impresses me about Brad Underwood? It’s his ability to win a Big Ten title, while simultaneously and vindictively denying playing time to the 5th guard on the depth chart in order to stick it to his dad to make sure he knows who the man is.

/s
Solid gold, my friend, and I'm delighted to see the number of LIKES you've received for it. You saved me some typing there this morning. I, too, have marveled continually at BU's amalgam of tenacity in the pursuit of victory and petty vindictiveness in putting adolescents in their place. It's simply masterful. :ROFLMAO:
 
#1,917      

JFGsCoffeeMug

BU:1 Trash cans:0
Chicago
Quoting BU from his interview, does anybody know who is he talking about?: "It’s speed dating today. That’s what the portal is. We lost a young man last year, we couldn’t get him into school, we couldn’t take him. Ten minutes later, it was on Twitter where he was going to school. That’s speed dating. You have to have your core values."
It was suggested earlier in the thread that BU was referencing Kyler Edwards, who ended up transferring to Houston. No clue if correct.
 
#1,918      
Solid gold, my friend, and I'm delighted to see the number of LIKES you've received for it. You saved me some typing there this morning. I, too, have marveled continually at BU's amalgam of tenacity in the pursuit of victory and petty vindictiveness in putting adolescents in their place. It's simply masterful. :ROFLMAO:
Never underestimate the value of petty vindictiveness.
 
#1,919      
I’m sure Coach Underwood had his reasons to not play Podz. He’s the Head Coach and he calls the shots. Regarding Miller he was very talented but also he was a MIF player and don’t think that didn’t carry some weight.
Once he got on campus imo it had no impact whatsoever. BU isn't going to allow external forces influence or make decisions for him nor should he. That's a big reason why Adam left. Some wanted him to be the primary ball handler but that was not BU. Adam was better and earned what he got and was physically more ready for the B10 when he was a freshman than most players are. However Underwood us no one's puppet. He makes his own choices and isn't going to be manipulated by MIF or anyone especially once they arrive to CU
 
Last edited:
#1,920      
The Portal = Good or Bad for College Basketball? The Good = parity as opportunities for talent to transfer efficiently keeps the blue bloods from dominating year after year; provides mid-majors with opportunities to acquire talent, develop roster depth and make a run. The Bad = crutch is now available as D1 athletes who have never experienced adversity look for greener pastures that don't exist; impacts coaching decisions during the season as coaches lose leverage; roster unrest = more resources allocated toward developing a program.

My take = while I see the benefits of the portal and appreciate them, it is Bad for the game and should be regulated away by the NCAA.
In today's environment = Probable lawsuit.
 
#1,921      
With 2 5th year bouns scholarships, what would have been your 8th man becomes your 10th man. No good teams are rolling 10 deep consistently. The rotation guys need to get used to playing together. Last year was a weird one to be a HC. A lot of unprecedented situations were thrown at these guys to make adjustments on the fly. I’d say BU did pretty well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.