Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#152      

Bigtex

DFW
Some insiders on Twitter now hinting that Jeremy Fears may soon be decommitting from MSU?
Way behind on my Illini reading but with MSU starting guards returning - fears playing time could be limited. I am shocked that this might happen somewhere other than at Illinois
 
#155      
Can we be done with the term creaning?

What used to be an unethical practice seems only fair now.
I don't completely disagree with your comment, but if we are potentially talking about recruiting over (and forcing out) Moretti, DGL or Harmon - 3 players who were recruited during this cycle and have yet to put on the uniform - I would think that hardly seems "fair".

Recruiting over players that have had a chance to develop and are found lacking is one thing - but offering a scholarship, getting someone on campus and then telling them to leave befor the next season is another.
 
#156      

Bigtex

DFW
Re: all the point guard concern -- isn't it more important to have a team that collectively passes, moves and makes good decisions/reads than to have a single player that you rely on do that? I'm not saying a good point guard doesn't help, but one of the frustrations and failings from last season wasn't specifically the point guard (aside from perhaps when the other team pressed), it was that NOBODY seemed to be on the same page. Guys waving frantically at each other where to go, or calling for the ball repeatedly and not getting it, or looking around for someone ANYONE to move as the shot clock winds down.

When you recall the amazing movement of the 2005 team, you likely picture 5 guys moving in synch, cutting off each other, delivering passes on time and on location. Sure, we had two great "point guards" in Dee and Deron, but more importantly, those guys worked well with each other, and the whole team was locked in. You didn't have a lot of Deron bringing it up, driving and dishing, or making one great pass to a teammate for an open look. You had a whole team running the offense together -- 5, 10, 15 passes before getting a wide open look.

This is my concern with the heavy reliance on transfers -- I think it's difficult to "teach" chemistry, and thus you'll have more teams that are collections of individuals rather than cohesive units. You'll have to rely on pick and roll because you can run it with only a couple guys instead of needing 5 working together. You'll need more "stars" who can "get their own shot" because you'll have a harder time teaching a whole roster of new guys to work seamlessly together.

The hope with a group of older players is that they will be able to pick up the team dynamics more quickly than new freshman, but whether they form great chemistry seems like a crap shoot. A "true" point guard will help that, but it won't solve the problem by itself. Having five guys who can move and pass pretty well with each other is likely better than one guy who is a star, and four who can't or won't run the offense.
My frustration with 22/23 was the lack of player movement on offense which in turn resulted in horrible offensive possessions. Grant it there wasn’t a PG on the floor but the entire team needs to run an offense.

Hopefully they weren’t running the offense. But didn’t see players getting an earful unless you were Epps.
 
#158      
I don't completely disagree with your comment, but if we are potentially talking about recruiting over (and forcing out) Moretti, DGL or Harmon - 3 players who were recruited during this cycle and have yet to put on the uniform - I would think that hardly seems "fair".

Recruiting over players that have had a chance to develop and are found lacking is one thing - but offering a scholarship, getting someone on campus and then telling them to leave befor the next season is another.
Then can we at least coin the new term "clarking"?
 
#159      

drsmitty74

Rochester
Because we’ll get one open …

If Johnson wants to be here … We’ll make room …
Does he want to be here? Does TA have a relationship? You guys(insiders) have all alluded to the fact that we are not done, and that TA was involved. Was this the one tou were hinting at, or, is there yet a name we have not been given clues to?
 
#160      
I don't completely disagree with your comment, but if we are potentially talking about recruiting over (and forcing out) Moretti, DGL or Harmon - 3 players who were recruited during this cycle and have yet to put on the uniform - I would think that hardly seems "fair".

Recruiting over players that have had a chance to develop and are found lacking is one thing - but offering a scholarship, getting someone on campus and then telling them to leave befor the next season is another.
This is essentially how Crean got a bad name for this. In the post-Sampson craziness he had 7 new guys signed to start in November and then signed 7 in the early period meaning that 1 of the 7 guys who hadn't yet played a game knew that he wasn't going to be around the following year.
 
#161      
Does he want to be here? Does TA have a relationship? You guys(insiders) have all alluded to the fact that we are not done, and that TA was involved. Was this the one tou were hinting at, or, is there yet a name we have not been given clues to?
I am sure they have several options they are looking at.
 
#163      

skyIdub

Winged Warrior
Because we’ll get one open …

If Johnson wants to be here … We’ll make room

thats-what-she-said-what-she-said.gif
 
#164      
There has to be info we are not aware:
Hawkins wouldn’t come back without an experienced PG
Spending the last scholarship on an injured player requiring transfer approval
Two PG’s on roster that are not possibilities to start

Doesn’t seem to make any sense from my perspective and I know our staff is not stupid so there must be another addition or there is great potential from a player already on the roster. Not paid to worry about it so will leave it to those who are being paid very well.
 
#165      
This is essentially how Crean got a bad name for this. In the post-Sampson craziness he had 7 new guys signed to start in November and then signed 7 in the early period meaning that 1 of the 7 guys who hadn't yet played a game knew that he wasn't going to be around the following year.
That was a different age. It is now the wild, wild west, every man for himself era of one season at a time.
 
#166      
Well, some guys have to provide major backup minutes to Williams (20+) if he plays but we do not even know if he is elgible, or if he can physically play.

The question is then who starts at PG? I agree with other poster that Rodgers was not great fit. Harris is not a PG.

So then it is Harmon and some combination of guys we have. Harmon actually averaged more TOs than assists.
He really seems like a 2 mostly.
Not that he is not a usable option or a better option than Rodgers or Harris or DGL (or Epps was), but not ideal.

Or, of course we get a another guy in here and they take the role and somebody moves on.
It will get worked out. This is a tourney team already with no additions. Lots of solid pieces.

I do like the fact that both he and Williams have 2-3 years of eligibility left. We need that stability.
If you're talking about Harmon when you said he and Williams have 2-3 years left, that's not correct. Harmon played 2 years at a JUCO. He was a 1:1 A/TO ratio in JUCO too.

If you look at our roster, we're really in a bit of a recruiting mess. Not to pick on the kid, but I did not understand the Moretti commitment. Granted I only saw limited video, but he didn't look really close to Big Ten caliber to me. It reminded me of the Lieb offer. Loved Lieb's effort, but he was not Big Ten caliber. But you can't really force them to leave. Last year fans wanted Lieb's scholarship for a transfer, now we want Moretti's. Well why bring them in then, if you need a practice body, bring in a walkon.

So I've been thinking, Underwood typically plays 8-9 guys in his rotation. Our roster looks like:
1 - Williams, Harmon, Morretti
2 - Shannon, Goode, Sencire, DGL
3 - Rodgers, Domask
4 - Hawkins, Hansberry, Guerrier
5 - Dainja, Guerrier

So if you say the 1st 2 at each position play, then that leaves off Sencire. Doubt that happens. We really need another PG. Don't see how we can go into the season with what we have. So presumably, if that occurs, one of the guys not expected to play will leave and the new guy will be expected to play. So are we going to have a 10 or 11 man rotation? I somehow doubt it.
 
#167      
There has to be info we are not aware:
Hawkins wouldn’t come back without an experienced PG
Spending the last scholarship on an injured player requiring transfer approval
Two PG’s on roster that are not possibilities to start

Doesn’t seem to make any sense from my perspective and I know our staff is not stupid so there must be another addition or there is great potential from a player already on the roster. Not paid to worry about it so will leave it to those who are being paid very well.
I was just about to ask this same question. I thought Shannon and Hawkins returning was contingent on landing an experienced pg? Other than the feedback they got back from the nba I thought this was the deal
 
#168      
That was a different age. It is now the wild, wild west, every man for himself era of one season at a time.
Agree. This is the other side of the player benefit coin. Many are benefitting by being compensated but the less talented, less experienced players are getting squeezed out. If unlimited transfers continue, this practice will continue for better or worse.
 
#169      
If you're talking about Harmon when you said he and Williams have 2-3 years left, that's not correct. Harmon played 2 years at a JUCO. He was a 1:1 A/TO ratio in JUCO too.

If you look at our roster, we're really in a bit of a recruiting mess. Not to pick on the kid, but I did not understand the Moretti commitment. Granted I only saw limited video, but he didn't look really close to Big Ten caliber to me. It reminded me of the Lieb offer. Loved Lieb's effort, but he was not Big Ten caliber. But you can't really force them to leave. Last year fans wanted Lieb's scholarship for a transfer, now we want Moretti's. Well why bring them in then, if you need a practice body, bring in a walkon.

So I've been thinking, Underwood typically plays 8-9 guys in his rotation. Our roster looks like:
1 - Williams, Harmon, Morretti
2 - Shannon, Goode, Sencire, DGL
3 - Rodgers, Domask
4 - Hawkins, Hansberry, Guerrier
5 - Dainja, Guerrier

So if you say the 1st 2 at each position play, then that leaves off Sencire. Doubt that happens. We really need another PG. Don't see how we can go into the season with what we have. So presumably, if that occurs, one of the guys not expected to play will leave and the new guy will be expected to play. So are we going to have a 10 or 11 man rotation? I somehow doubt it.
Good reminder about Harmon. My mistake.
Yeah, roster construction is curious for sure.

I don't think we can count on Williams until he is cleared with a waiver and physically.

I agree Harris is also one of the odd men out if Williams can go, and especially if we get another high level guard in here.

I also agree we're only going to play 8 to 9 guys.

A lot of moving pieces still around the PG role.
 
#170      
I don't completely disagree with your comment, but if we are potentially talking about recruiting over (and forcing out) Moretti, DGL or Harmon - 3 players who were recruited during this cycle and have yet to put on the uniform - I would think that hardly seems "fair".

Recruiting over players that have had a chance to develop and are found lacking is one thing - but offering a scholarship, getting someone on campus and then telling them to leave befor the next season is another.

These things are rarely as simple as they appear. Really hard to judge this one, especially with a foreign player involved. I assume that any accepted commitment still has contingencies, and if you think about it from the other side, a player can commit and then ask out of their commitment and it's virtually guaranteed that they can walk away.

My hope is that the communication is honest and forthright, but I'm not naive enough to think that's always the case. There's a fair amount of 'buyer beware' on both sides. There's too much pressure to win on the program side, and too much at stake with the player's careers on the other. Both sides have leverage --just depends on how skilled the athlete is who has more.
 
#172      
Even with Johnson, I am not convinced we are a 2nd weekend team, yet.

We are clearly in an experimental phase. Forced by circumstances, granted.
 
#174      
If you're talking about Harmon when you said he and Williams have 2-3 years left, that's not correct. Harmon played 2 years at a JUCO. He was a 1:1 A/TO ratio in JUCO too.

If you look at our roster, we're really in a bit of a recruiting mess. Not to pick on the kid, but I did not understand the Moretti commitment. Granted I only saw limited video, but he didn't look really close to Big Ten caliber to me. It reminded me of the Lieb offer. Loved Lieb's effort, but he was not Big Ten caliber. But you can't really force them to leave. Last year fans wanted Lieb's scholarship for a transfer, now we want Moretti's. Well why bring them in then, if you need a practice body, bring in a walkon.

So I've been thinking, Underwood typically plays 8-9 guys in his rotation. Our roster looks like:
1 - Williams, Harmon, Morretti
2 - Shannon, Goode, Sencire, DGL
3 - Rodgers, Domask
4 - Hawkins, Hansberry, Guerrier
5 - Dainja, Guerrier

So if you say the 1st 2 at each position play, then that leaves off Sencire. Doubt that happens. We really need another PG. Don't see how we can go into the season with what we have. So presumably, if that occurs, one of the guys not expected to play will leave and the new guy will be expected to play. So are we going to have a 10 or 11 man rotation? I somehow doubt it.
It's probably its a lot more complicated than that and I'd expect Sencire will at least get similar minutes to this year as a defensive sub but could earn more if he improves offensively.

Additionally the positions are a lot more flexible. Harmon is capable of playing the 1 and 2. Shannon the 2 and 3. All of Goode, Rodgers, and Domask are likely capable of playing 2-4. With Hawkins also capable of playing the 5 though supposedly he doesn't want to.
 
#175      

Bigtex

DFW
I was just about to ask this same question. I thought Shannon and Hawkins returning was contingent on landing an experienced pg? Other than the feedback they got back from the nba I thought this was the deal
Like our insiders, who thought Dennis was Illinois bound, I am sure Hawkins & Shannon were also planning on Dennis on the team
 
Status
Not open for further replies.