Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#51      

Dbell1981

Decatur, IL
Not sure if im late to the party but.....šŸ˜†šŸ˜†šŸ˜† 1000001233.jpg
 
#54      
Going to be a very nice role player the next 3 years. Can shoot the heck out of it
Will his role be more of a sharpshooting player off the bench? If so, he's good with that? (Honestly curious. I have no clue what his ceiling is.)
 
#56      

blackdog

Champaign
based on what? In 944 minutes of game play, he took 46 FTs. For comparison, in 1,023 minutes, Terrence Shannon took 260 FTs. Granted, Terrence gets more FTs than most, but that is 0.25 FTs/min vs 0.05 FTs/min. Marcus Domask shot 0.12 FTs/min.

Davis is a jump shooter only. I look at him and say nice player, there has to be someone better out there. I'm far less interested in these Low/Mid Major players unless they just jump off the page. I'd much rather go after the P6 transfers we know will flood the market shortly.
Compare him to Goode who only took 22 two point shots all season. Davis obviously takes a lot of 3s but at least showed he can attack a closeout or cut off the ball to score. He's not going to take it off the dribble but attacking closeouts means the defense can't just completely sell out to contest the shot.
 
#57      
Glad I read first before posting this guy's name as someone I'd like to see us take a long hard look at. Similar in size to Shannon, play's downhill, strong defender, and showing signs of developing a 3 point shot.
 
#58      

billybaroo

Pebble Beach, CA
based on what? In 944 minutes of game play, he took 46 FTs. For comparison, in 1,023 minutes, Terrence Shannon took 260 FTs. Granted, Terrence gets more FTs than most, but that is 0.25 FTs/min vs 0.05 FTs/min. Marcus Domask shot 0.12 FTs/min.

Davis is a jump shooter only. I look at him and say nice player, there has to be someone better out there. I'm far less interested in these Low/Mid Major players unless they just jump off the page. I'd much rather go after the P6 transfers we know will flood the market shortly.
Based solely on his mixtape which included a couple drives to the hoop where he looked comfortable and composed. FWIW, the video also says that 25% of his shot attempts are at the rim. Clearly I didn't do my homework.
 
#59      

ChiefGritty

Chicago, IL
based on what? In 944 minutes of game play, he took 46 FTs. For comparison, in 1,023 minutes, Terrence Shannon took 260 FTs. Granted, Terrence gets more FTs than most, but that is 0.25 FTs/min vs 0.05 FTs/min. Marcus Domask shot 0.12 FTs/min.

Davis is a jump shooter only. I look at him and say nice player, there has to be someone better out there. I'm far less interested in these Low/Mid Major players unless they just jump off the page. I'd much rather go after the P6 transfers we know will flood the market shortly.
Kinda tough to judge without knowing what his share of the NIL kitty would be. Also, it sounds like a guy of his size and shooting/skill level ended up at Mercer in the first place over concerns about his defense.

But as a guy with 3 years left to play the comparison point is more Jason Jakstys than Marcus Domask.

He was a HS teammate of Xavier Booker at Indianapolis Cathedral, I'm sure our staff has some familiarity with him. He must have answered their doubts in being so productive as a freshman.
 
Last edited:
#64      
I'm not an Illini fan but if you want to keep plundering MVC talent this guy is good

see now I like this guy more than Davis in almost every way.

2 years as a starter, averaging double digit points, career 45% from 3 on 287 attempts, more rebounds, more assists.

I never expect a guy to step up in competition and continue to shoot at the same percentage. But when you're shooting 45% from 3, even a 5% dip, and you're still a fantastic shooter.

No guarantee he has any interest in Illinois. Being a North Carolina native, I could see Duke and UNC showing interest. But this is the type of Mid Major guy I get interested in.
 
#71      
I think him having three years is also a big deal for the staff as well. They want to really build this thing up not only for next year but 2025-Morez's sophomore season
To your point on Morezā€™s soph season, is the goal every year with Brad just going to be to maximize wins that year or is there any consideration to a likely ā€œpeakā€ year?

It seems this past year if he thought TSJ and Coleman were coming back it made more sense to really go for it for the single run with 1 year mercenaries (that weā€™re in the middle of).
 
#72      
To your point on Morezā€™s soph season, is the goal every year with Brad just going to be to maximize wins that year or is there any consideration to a likely ā€œpeakā€ year?

It seems this past year if he thought TSJ and Coleman were coming back it made more sense to really go for it for the single run with 1 year mercenaries (that weā€™re in the middle of).
Thatā€™s the goal every yearā€¦..for every coach
 
#73      
Thatā€™s the goal every yearā€¦..for every coach
With filling possibly 4-5 spots, I hope a player like Morez is able to get significant playing time. But, if BU and staff will be getting studs, then I understand limited playing time, but I think Morez is a different animal, so to speak. He can make a difference from Day 1, I believe.
 
#74      
With filling possibly 4-5 spots, I hope a player like Morez is able to get significant playing time. But, if BU and staff will be getting studs, then I understand limited playing time, but I think Morez is a different animal, so to speak. He can make a difference from Day 1, I believe.

Morez might not start but heā€™ll get a lot of playing time
 
Status
Not open for further replies.