Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#476      
He is built more like Karl Malone and with a little more time to work on his skill that would be awesome. I think he is a old school power 4 crashing the boards like the former Bull/Knick Charles Oakley that can play the 5 and Tomi is a modern stretch 5.
Morez likely will never shoot or handle the ball in the open court like Derik Queen, but he could learn plenty about keeping the ball high and attacking the basket by looking at Queen's game.

A full off season with OA will do wonders.
 
#477      
Sarr is going to be the rim runner on the break.

Dix shot .572 on 2 point FG as a 3rd year player. (6 attempts per game)
TJ shot .573 on 2 point FG as a 5th year player. (7 attempts per game)

He’s not close to the athlete, but…
Great points, but just seeing how TSJ had an effect on the game was a great sight to see. And that's what makes him very special--he cannot be duplicated.
 
#478      
that Rodgers is legit considering it is flat-out great (and surprising). I thought he was a goner when he opted to redshirt. really hope he decides to stay. definitely not counting on it though

can we find ~20 mpg for Ty? (part of that is largely on Ty) will he accept it?
Agree. Perhaps he is not seeing the love he'd hoped from other teams to make a transfer enticing?
 
#479      
Yup, but there are those that blame Brad for every player that leaves. I guess Brad should just tell the entire roster they have a guaranteed starting spot.
Well I'm not sure what the numbers look like, and I realize it's the "new norm" but it does still feel like for a team that's had the same coach throughout the open portaling era, we turn over our roster A LOT more than others. And to what end? Based on the players that leave, and the player that come in, it doesn't feel like either side of that is getting a meaningful improvement in the scenario. Of course we hit the occasional Homerun in terms of an incoming tranfer, and occasionally a player who leaves hits a homerun in their new destination, but for the most part it's just similar level players shuffling around until everyone (whether outgoing or incoming) comes to accept they are what they are as a Super Senior wherever the musical chairs of it all ends up rather than some more efficient allocation of players across the D1 landscape.

Yes, this is the typical "back in the day" but if you're just gonna cycle through players and they all end up in similar situations and you get similar level replacements anyways, it'd be nice to have retention/roster continuity from a multi-year building perspective. I'd love to see more of an emphasis on retention. Are Matt Painter and Tom Izzo "guaranteeing" everybody a starter spot? I doubt it. But there they are, with better teams than Illinois and in the Sweet Sixteen with a lot of multi-year players, including players that started on the bench and trusted the process to earn more minutes, whereas our fans are so eager to run everyone off in order to chase "upgrades" that often don't materialize.
 
Last edited:
#480      
Love Will, but his NIL package would have to be north of $5M. Don't see that happening. Not sure it’s a wise investment.
Wow - a team would need $10-$15M NIL budget to pay single player $5M. Even at KY KS or IN I can't see that high an NIL budget. I like Will but he was not even All B10. We are not talking Cooper Flagg (Duke), Johni Broome (Auburn) , Mark Sears (AL) or Walter Clayton (FL)
 
#481      
Is there a sight or web address where I can see who is entering the transfer portal?
 
#484      
I can tell you what I saw: AJ was an AJ guy. He was not a Wisconsin guy. Not going to be a Kansas guy. Not an Illini guy.

I cannot explain why Self and staff couldn't see this, but some people could. Easily.
 
#485      
Any word on how Ty’s shooting has progressed this season?
I went to their shoot around last Thursday (game on Friday) and to me, it looked like the ball still had a poor rotation and didn't look great, but heck.....if he makes one three, it would be more than he would have even taken his sophomore year, when he didn't bother to even look at the rim.

I love Ty, but on a great team at the high D1 level.....he's a glue guy off the bench at best. He'd have an extremely defined role. It could be that he came to that logical conclusion himself? My assumption is that Brad definitely sees value in him being on a really good roster, but his niche is going to be defense, physicality, nastiness, toughness, rebound on both ends, get some greasy buckets and be a leader.

There's a TON of value in that, but in taking on that role, you're pretty much accepting that you're not an NBA player. You're value comes with being a Damonte Williams type bad a$$. Those types of guys are critical to winning championships, but not a lot want to take the role on.
 
#486      
Who saw this issue, you might ask? Guys that played for the Badgers for four years. No one I know wanted the guy back. AJ is an AJ guy. Not a team guy.
 
#487      
Damonte is a super-high character guy. His family is well-justified in being proud of him.

That is not to say that other guys, making good decisions about 'college' eligibility, are not high-character as well. Many definitely are. But weird, dumb, irrational decisions get made all day, every day by we humans.
 
#488      
Homer blinking his eyes, Bart behind him on the left, Lisa is to Bart's right.
 
#490      
If I’ve learned one thing the past few years, it’s almost impossible to predict what’s gonna happen even with good transfers.

Who thought Domask was going to be all big ten? He was being thrown around as a bench player. Who thought Booth was going to average 0 mins.

At the end of the day, collective talent and let the coaches do their job.
 
#493      
From article above, any interest in Quimari Peterson.

He ranked top 15 in Division I in total points (603), field goals made (219) and 3-point percentage (43.1).
 
#494      
I still have 8 pages to catch up on...but POTD (y)
200.gif
 
#495      
I like Tre, but I'd think that you could replace him via portal a lot easier and cheaper than the first 3
Even more so with Jake. They both obviously have a year in the system, though.
Let Hummer free! as well as Hamer, please
Having continuity is important. While i agree with you on Ben, Tre would be a good player to have on next year's team. He's had some great games and it says a lot about his desire to stay after his"extended illness."
 
#497      
Morez likely will never shoot or handle the ball in the open court like Derik Queen, but he could learn plenty about keeping the ball high and attacking the basket by looking at Queen's game.

A full off season with OA will do wonders.
Morez will be working on a jump hook, right-handed and left-handed, I hope. He has the frame to make that work over all but the most gigantic (Edey) post defenders.

A full season with OA? As I understand it listening to Underwood, in-season resistance training is not different from out of season.
 
#500      
If I’ve learned one thing the past few years, it’s almost impossible to predict what’s gonna happen even with good transfers.
Predicting the future, even for fifth-year guys, isn't going to ever be perfect. But it is absolutely NOT impossible to place meaningful probabilities upon outcome. It takes a lot of boring effort to do that, but done relentlessly, it is possible to make GOOD (not perfect) decisions. We've seen some lazy and not good decisions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back