Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#153      
Man, don't start this again. That dead horse was beaten to a pulp. Let's focus on what the roster looks like and if it can be diverse enough to alter schematics on both ends of the floor.

It's recruiting, recruiting, recruiting right now. If we don't do well here, the coaching carousel thread just as well be deleted....unless the focus is staff accountability with roster construction.
 
#158      
Well and critically to the point everyone is fretting about, Z neutralizes plus athletes on the interior with his rim protection ability.

Z is a very different player than Tomi defensively.

Overall team athleticism was definitely a factor in our defensive struggles last year, but I feel like youth and inexperience is being underrated as a contributor as well. In both respects Will Riley is escaping the culpability he deserves in this thread's hilarious stereotype-fest.

Which also brings up the point....if Mirk is as advertised offensively and is a liability defensively, then Z might be a better fit alongside him instead of Tomi.
 
#159      
As the board's foremost "bet on our guys and retain everybody" advocate, I feel guilty not sticking up more for Humdinger.
But I just feel like Mirkovic is a better basketball player, and now clearly occupies the same role. Every indication would be that Ben will now have two more years to play (NAIA years appear to not count in the new world order), and I feel like he would probably have a happier time integrating himself into a larger role elsewhere.

He's guaranteed to shoot 50% from three if he does, we all know that.
:D:D:D - I think Ben would shoot better next year for Illinois if he stayed. The game appeared to be slowing down for him 2nd half of B10 season. His defense, rebounding, and hustle for loose balls really improved. Brad also stopped trying to have him guard All American power forwards. However I think a stronger Jake Davis can play the same role - more athletic and quicker release. with Mirkovic, the twin Ivicics and Jake I think Ben becomes a luxury. If he wants to stay for low $NIL I would keep him for continuity and hope he can shoot 40% from 3.
 
#160      
Two first rounders committed last year in May. Our best player since Ayo (TSJ) committed 04/29.

I wrote you a poem to help remember:

If the month has a four, wait some more.
If our team looks bad in May then now it's your day.
Either way silence will be divine, because no one wants to hear you whine.
 
#161      
So far happy with the retention and the additions but I am genuinely worried about how this team is going to get stops next year with this current roster lol.

The roster currently calls for a 3 level wing/guard scorer who also grades out as a ++ defender... Those are obviously tough to come by.

I have no doubt this team will score the basketball but how will they prevent it?

Also when will we see a defensive minded, seasoned assistant coach be added?
We obviously aren't building this roster to be able to play man to man defense.

I'm hearing from sources I can't reveal, that Bu is talking to this guy. /s :) He might be looking to supplement his SSA checks...... Hearing also he knows a little about the zone?
1744134832442.png
 
Last edited:
#162      
Reading a lot of opinions and concerns about Mirkovic and "athleticism". Some people have mentioned his fallaway shots. Got me thinking about Marcus Domask. Where was he on your athleticism scale? I hope we all agree that Marcus was a vital cog on that very successful team last year.
 
#163      
In the manner of say a Nikola Jokic or Luka Doncic in the NBA!? I definitely understand the reservation. Hopefully, he gives us that type of play, then I can overlook the explosive athleticism.
I keep seeing folks use Jokic or Doncic as a comparative. This feels like the old "athletic Larry Bird" stuff to me. It is beyond unlikely this guy is somehow one of the top 5-10 players in the world.

I can get more comfortable with a Damask comp, though I don't know how far in the tourney we get with that. But it seems silly to compare 2 all time great players who are unathletic for the NBA with a guy who looks much less athletic than his Euro League.
 
#165      
The blueprint for success is out there. UConn the previous 2 years, Houston, Auburn, Alabama, Florida this year. You don't have to have top level freshman to win. In fact, you most likely aren't winning with them as the key pieces. Duke was the exception this year with a generational freshman in Flagg. You build a roster with athletic guys from mid-majors that have had some success and are tough and will be with you for at least a few years. Florida and Houston last night had athletes all over the place.

The difference in talent between those teams and Illinois this year and what appears to be shaping up for next year is pretty glaring. I would argue Brad is putting together an incredibly unathletic roster so far. If we want to basically just be satisfied with being near the top of the B1G and making the tournament, then I guess it's fine. I have bigger hopes for the Illini. Like what Oats has done with my other team (Bama). Many athletes and lots of experience. Clearly did not help against Duke this year but Oats has led Bama to the sweet sixteen 4 of the last 5 years and has been in the final four and the elite 8 the last 2 years. He did it by taking mid major guys and having them stick around and supplement with highly skilled and athletic freshman.
 
#166      
I keep seeing folks use Jokic or Doncic as a comparative. This feels like the old "athletic Larry Bird" stuff to me. It is beyond unlikely this guy is somehow one of the top 5-10 players in the world.

I can get more comfortable with a Damask comp, though I don't know how far in the tourney we get with that. But it seems silly to compare 2 all time great players who are unathletic for the NBA with a guy who looks much less athletic than his Euro League.

Nobody is comparing him to Jokic after his development into an NBA star. It was referenced with what scouts initially saw in Jokic.

The comparisons to them are potential, not finished product.
 
#167      
-We have added good shooting 21 year old JR 7 footer. Any big 10 team would love to have just one. Z was considered top 5 recruit when he went to KY.
-We just got mini "jokic" 6'9" 250 PF. turns 20 in January. He is 4 months older than Will Riley and is 6 months older than KJ who just completed their freshman year. So he is sophomore age.

We are returning - "get old stay old"

- solid SR PG who can score inside
- Soph 21 year old Great passing and shooting 7' center
- Redshirt JR Experienced great rebounding high energy wing
- JR Experienced good shooting wing

We have two solid incoming freshman guards

At end of 2024-5 season we started 3 freshman - KJ, Tomas and Will with 1st off bench Morez - so 4 of top 6 players were freshman. We were one of youngest teams in NCAA and we still got #6 seed and advanced to 2nd round.

It is only April 8th. More portal and possible high school reclass or Sarr on way.

I am very excited. We are not combining 10 new players. We have solid core returning. I think we have excellent shot at 4-7 seed depending on how things work out.

I just can't figure out how Purdue can get Smith and TKR to return when they are both obvious NBA first rounders. Its like KJ and Will not even going to NBA draft camp this year.
Tomi was a Soph this year will be a Junior alongside his brother
 
#168      
Nobody is comparing him to Jokic after his development into an NBA star. It was referenced with what scouts initially saw in Jokic.

The comparisons to them are potential, not finished product.
I don’t know. I’m pretty confident he’s a combo of Jokic, Doncic, Larry Bird and Marcus Domask’s greatest qualities. We are landing him because we have better scouts than the NBA. /s
 
#169      
Reading a lot of opinions and concerns about Mirkovic and "athleticism". Some people have mentioned his fallaway shots. Got me thinking about Marcus Domask. Where was he on your athleticism scale? I hope we all agree that Marcus was a vital cog on that very successful team last year.
How about if we are the opposite and have only one athlete instead of one Domask type?
 
#170      
I keep seeing folks use Jokic or Doncic as a comparative. This feels like the old "athletic Larry Bird" stuff to me. It is beyond unlikely this guy is somehow one of the top 5-10 players in the world.

I can get more comfortable with a Damask comp, though I don't know how far in the tourney we get with that. But it seems silly to compare 2 all time great players who are unathletic for the NBA with a guy who looks much less athletic than his Euro League.

Damask is fine, but if you have kids, far better to stick with vinyl
 
#171      
I keep seeing folks use Jokic or Doncic as a comparative. This feels like the old "athletic Larry Bird" stuff to me. It is beyond unlikely this guy is somehow one of the top 5-10 players in the world.

I can get more comfortable with a Damask comp, though I don't know how far in the tourney we get with that. But it seems silly to compare 2 all time great players who are unathletic for the NBA with a guy who looks much less athletic than his Euro League.
No one is projecting him to be as good as those players. But if players with limited athleticism (according to how Americans think of that term) can be all time NBA greats, then another player with limited athleticism can be a good college player.
 
#173      
Malik Moore, a 6'5" 190-pound Junior Guard from Montana, looks like he'd be a nice pickup for the Illini. He's long and lanky; I like that, as long as he's athletic enough to keep up with smaller/quicker guards on defense. (Anyone know about his defense?) Moore averaged 12.6 points, 3.2 rebounds, and 2.4 assists for Montana this past season. He shot 45.6% on FGs, including 40.9% on 3-pointers, and 82.2% on FTs. That's a very good percentage on 3s, albeit vs. less than Big Ten level defenses.

I just don't understand how much better he might be than 6'6" 200-pound Sophomore Guard Sam Lewis from Toledo, via Simeon High School. (He just recently transferred to Virginia.) Lewis averaged 16.2 points/4.7 rebounds/1.2 assists this past season, while shooting 47.0% on FGs, including 44.4% on 3-pointers, and 76.6% on FTs. I liked that Lewis is only a sophomore, that he's an Illinois/Chicago kid, and that his numbers are as good as, if not better than, those of Malik Moore. Maybe Lewis's camp wanted more money than Illinois was willing to pay? Or more than the Illini will be paying to Moore?

In any case, I will trust the coaching staff on this one. I hope that the Illini can get a transfer from Malik Moore. He would fill a need on the roster for next season.
 
#174      
Malik Moore, a 6'5" 190-pound Junior Guard from Montana, looks like he'd be a nice pickup for the Illini. He's long and lanky; I like that, as long as he's athletic enough to keep up with smaller/quicker guards on defense. (Anyone know about his defense?) Moore averaged 12.6 points, 3.2 rebounds, and 2.4 assists for Montana this past season. He shot 45.6% on FGs, including 40.9% on 3-pointers, and 82.2% on FTs. That's a very good percentage on 3s, albeit vs. less than Big Ten level defenses.

I just don't understand how much better he might be than 6'6" 200-pound Sophomore Guard Sam Lewis from Toledo, via Simeon High School. (He just recently transferred to Virginia.) Lewis averaged 16.2 points/4.7 rebounds/1.2 assists this past season, while shooting 47.0% on FGs, including 44.4% on 3-pointers, and 76.6% on FTs. I liked that Lewis is only a sophomore, that he's an Illinois/Chicago kid, and that his numbers are as good as, if not better than, those of Malik Moore. Maybe Lewis's camp wanted more money than Illinois was willing to pay? Or more than the Illini will be paying to Moore?

In any case, I will trust the coaching staff on this one. I hope that the Illini can get a transfer from Malik Moore. He would fill a need on the roster for next season.
Is he on our radar?
 
#175      
No one is projecting him to be as good as those players. But if players with limited athleticism (according to how Americans think of that term) can be all time NBA greats, then another player with limited athleticism can be a good college player.
The fact that he is playing at the Nike Hoops Summit next week suggests he will be a pretty good college player... Go ahead and look up the world team from last year. You'll recognize most of those guys by name.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back