Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#977      
Jake Davis leaving would be the most baffling transfer decision since Miller left.

Doesn't seem like the type to get a major bag anywhere, Brad loves him, and he started on a final four team.

I get his role is likely reduced this coming year but I can't imagine anyone is offering him a role outside of bench spot up shooter.
Why not? He started on a Final 4 team. Who doesn't need a 6'6" guy who can knock down around 40% of his threes, rarely miss a defensive assignment, never turn it over, and rebound above his weight class?
I doubt anyone is guaranteeing him a starting spot, but there are certainly teams where he wouldn't have to fight so hard for starter minutes. If we retain all the guys we hope we will, and bring in someone like Blackwell, he's going to have his hands full keeping his minutes. Coleman and Morillo may not be Wagler type freshmen, but they will likely be more ready to contribute than Lee was.
I hope he stays. He's a heck of a college basketball player, and a true EDG.
 
#978      
He is the type (no NBA career) that SHOULD be looking to see what other options there are. If someone is going to pay him substantially more than we are he needs to take it. No hard feelings. Get that bread while you can.
Yup. Improving his NBA stock in in all likelihood not an issue. Getting some $ while he can, very well might the deal. He might even be happy to go from starting to coming off the bench.
 
#979      
He's a medium volume 41% 3pt shooter with a quick release. Rated #1 in the nation in offensive efficiency at 1.466ppp though on only 10.8% usage. And he's 4th in the nation in turnover percent and he has pretty solid offensive rebounding numbers for a shooting guard. There is absolutely no question he should be getting offers. Question is whether we'll be willing to match and if he wants to stay here, as I'd almost assume he will be offered more elsewhere.
It's Davis' cash in time.
 
#980      
wonder woman television GIF

Username checks out.
 
#982      
He is the type (no NBA career) that SHOULD be looking to see what other options there are. If someone is going to pay him substantially more than we are he needs to take it. No hard feelings. Get that bread while you can.
Misko doing his job
 
#983      
Not really being talked about in here but I personally feel like there's a decent chance Jake leaves. May be wrong but he was pretty much unplayable against top teams with great athletes. He can't get himself open as well as other top shooters so it's hard for him to even get his shot off. I feel like Brad will be honest with him in the player meeting and there's a decent chance we recruit over him.
 
#984      
Jake Davis leaving would be the most baffling transfer decision since Miller left.

Doesn't seem like the type to get a major bag anywhere, Brad loves him, and he started on a final four team.

I get his role is likely reduced this coming year but I can't imagine anyone is offering him a role outside of bench spot up shooter.
NOTHING surprises me in today’s recruiting/portal world. Nothing.
 
#985      
Remember Jacob Grandison? Guys may have more value than it may appear.

Actually, thinking about who might have a draw to Davis specifically, perish the thought but is Luke Goode the actual comp here?
Win Some Lose Some Josh Gates GIF by Discovery
 
#987      
We didn't offer.

Wisconsin did, developed Blackwell for three years, and now he would be jumping ship within the conference for a bunch of money. Terrible for the sport, but good for us.
Are we just pretending that all the benefit of that relationship flowed to Blackwell, and none to Wisconsin?

They identified a good player, and he stuck around for three years contributing a lot of basketball success. From what I understand, he could have made more by entering the transfer portal last offseason, but chose to return to Wisconsin. I think it worked out well for both parties. I don't know, maybe it is terrible for the sport. But I don't think the old paradigm, where players had as close to zero leverage as possible, while coaches, athletic directors, and others reaped the benefits of a billion-dollar industry, was good for the sport either.
 
Last edited:
#989      
I'm not sure he's easily upgradeable. Hes a lethal shooter who also gives us size and rebounding. And would be in the system for year 3.

I'd really like Jake back.
Which is why I want to think at the end of the day he'd be more valuable to us than to anyone else out in the wild.

But that kind of rationality doesn't always win the day. Sometimes other programs overbid thinking the winning juju will come along with the guy.

And then there's the question of whether our increased budget will keep up with the inflation of success some of our guys compensation will demand. One of the insiders had talked about the roster budget rising from $10 million to $15 million. I think a lot of people were pumped about that, but I was honestly a little concerned, because it wasn't not clear if that includes the revenue sharing, from which most power conference teams are devoting about $5 million towards men's basketball. If that includes that revenue share, then isn't almost everyone's basketball roster budget going up about $5 million? That's an increase in absolute terms, but is it just treading water in relative terms?
 
#993      
100%. Everyone saying QC is already a starter are crazy. We have the entire portal to go through for heavy hitters and then if we don’t bring in a veteran then he has to beat out Jake Davis and Morillo,
Assuming the STL in your name means St. Louis, have you seen Coleman play? He’s pretty, pretty good!
 
#994      
Are we just pretending that all the benefit of that relationship flowed to Blackwell, and none to Wisconsin?

They identified a good player, and he stuck around for three years contributing a lot of basketball success. From what I understand, he could have made more by entering the transfer portal last offseason, but chose to return to Wisconsin. I think it worked out well for both parties. I don't know, maybe it is terrible for the sport. But I don't think the old paradigm, where players had as close to zero leverage as possible, while coaches, athletic directors, and others reaped the benefits of a billion-dollar industry, was good for the sport either.
It was morally unjustifiable and practically unsustainable, but it built a monster of fan interest. The dollars todays players are getting derive 100% to the very last penny to how much we the fans cared about their predecessors.

The players having the connection to our school that we have to our school was always an illusion, but that illusion was very powerful, and they're breaking it.

He didn’t come here to sit …
Neither did Stojakovic, but he was a "bench player"

Coleman is a factor next year, that's loud and clear. And justifiably so, very exciting film.
 
#995      
Jake Davis leaving would be the most baffling transfer decision since Miller left.

Doesn't seem like the type to get a major bag anywhere, Brad loves him, and he started on a final four team.

I get his role is likely reduced this coming year but I can't imagine anyone is offering him a role outside of bench spot up shooter.
Maybe he can go back to Mercer and play 35 minutes a game. I assume if he leaves he will go down a level and play full time.
 
#998      
Speaking of LAD, are deferred payment in NIL a thing?
Id reckon Nil only made it easier to give guys things there always existed all sorts of other ways and I imagine someone will try to come out with a different way soon...
 
#999      

Staff really likes him. Would also add a more defensive style guard if they go this route, but just another option.
Nice balance of stats for Vaaks. Height 6’7”, 16 pts, 35% on 3s, 1.5 A-TO ratio. Lot to like here.
 
#1,000      
He didn’t come here to sit …
There is a difference between sitting and starting as a freshman on a preseason top 5 team. He’s going to have earn it and it’s going to be very difficult. I’d EASILY wager he doesn’t start the entire season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back