Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

#426      
Interesting comment and here's why.... The big question is, can all of or a majority of the returners take the leap, right? Tomi, in my opinion took a step back from his first year here last season. At the very end of the season he started to pick it up again. I thought Mirk was fantastic, will he take a leap from fantastic? I really think Big Z could be the wild card, b/c I think he could end up being one of our best players if the he's in the right system/roll. It's very possible we could be better next year with this core or we could be worse. How many of these guys will be better than last year and by how much? I love returning the core. I'm pleased we have signed good freshmen and signed Vaaks. But how does a transfer end up fitting/playing? How often are freshmen (even 5 stars) studs their first year? Only time will tell. I'm in the camp that if we have Blackwell on this team we're one of the best team's in the nation, period. But if he doesn't want to be here we don't want him. It's still possible we could be a top 3 team without him, but it all depends on how these 5 improve heading into next season. If 3 or 4 out of 5 are better than this past year, we'll be really really good! I'd still like to add a bench roll big man who can just defend. That covers us in the event of foul trouble/injury. I love those 6'10" monsters in the paint who can body up anyone, alter shots, and rebound. If they can't score, we win! ILL
Honestly I think the majority here can get behind this sentiment, and that it sums up the discourse since #theRetention wrapped up. How optimistic we are coming off a great season with great potential for the next, and an incredible returning roster that we cannot wait to see come November. But that there are also just a couple tweaks in the formula that look visible to those of us not in the practice facility. Blackwell could have made us undoubtedly favorites, but if he doesn’t want in, we don’t want him anyway. No matter what, we’re going to be a threat all season.
 
#427      
I know everyone is excited about “the Retention” but on paper we are a worse team next year than we were this year. Lots of variables have to hit for us to maintain.

And we don’t have enough defense or athleticism yet.
Explain.

What other team is bringing back roughly 70% of their overall production? If you're referencing losing Wagler to the draft or Boswell to graduation, then literally every team is worse....on paper. If you compare Vaaks stats, on paper, with Keaton.....how much is the fallout....on paper?

What does the jump from a Freshman Vaaks with no talent around him to a Sophomore jump with shooters everywhere look like?

Losing Boswell/Petrovic, but picking up Coleman/Morillo, what's the comparison?

A full summer of practice together, having everyone admitted and cleared, along with the retention......what does that do?

How good will the freshmen be come March?

I'm not going to jinx us on health.

When you take on transfers, all you're assessing is numbers. You have no clue what the fit is. What if we take on Blackwell and he doesn't move the ball around? What if his personality doesn't mesh with the retained players who are very, very close? Is he the odd man out?

You just never know.

Btw.... Michigan lost the conference player of the year. On paper, they're worse.

Edit: Mirk, Drej and Tomi would have all be top 15 transfers in the portal.
 
#428      
So we should have gone to the portal instead of retaining our guys who all would’ve been top guys in the portal had they entered? 🤔🤦🏻‍♂️
Compromise Shrug GIF
 
#429      
I know everyone is excited about “the Retention” but on paper we are a worse team next year than we were this year. Lots of variables have to hit for us to maintain.

And we don’t have enough defense or athleticism yet.
Worse than the team at the end of the season because you lost a lottery pick. But we are much better on paper than than we were on paper to start last year.
 
#430      
The Office Thank You GIF


Wagler is a lotto pick. Vaaks was not. Both were/are rising sophomores. Kylan’s injury hurt his offense. But it’s a stretch to say Coleman as a freshman will be a clear upgrade.

And I expect some YoY improvement but Tomi actually declined YoY this past year. We’re banking a lot on step ups from Dre and Mirk. The YoY improvement could happen but it’s no guaranteed thing.

Ask Loyer and TKR.
Every single year over a dozen guys are lotto picks and somehow college basketball still has good players every year. You'd think we'd be down to guys who just constantly dribble off their foot by now. Very strange.
 
#431      
It is interesting that the better a program does, the more angry the fan base becomes.

Since we were in a battle with Duke this offseason, I spent quite a bit of time on their boards. They’re absolutely miserable.
Of course they're miserable - have you met many Duke people?!

A former colleague got his law degree at Duke. While there, he picked up a masters in public policy just to meet other people who were not Duke law students.
 
#432      
It is interesting that the better a program does, the more angry the fan base becomes.

Since we were in a battle with Duke this offseason, I spent quite a bit of time on their boards. They’re absolutely miserable.
Big success breeds bigger expectations. We keep making sweet sixteen and elite eights for each of the next 5-7 years but no championship games, the fan base will re-calibrate failure from the groce years of being excited just to make the tournament. Until we fail consistently at a higher level, our expectations will remain lower.
 
#435      
I don’t think starting Jake was the problem….most efficient offense was with Jake on the court.
This is where I think the concerns about adding a high-usage Blackwell are legit. Sure, he'd score a lot more and make more "wow" plays than Jake, but it's not hard to imagine the offense as a unit being just one step away from firing on all cylinders consistently.

Starting tomi, mirk, andrej, jake and vaaks doesn't give me the same concerns about 'efficiency' as having blackwell in there instead of jake. But it sounds like we'll just never know.
 
#437      
So we should have gone to the portal instead of retaining our guys who all would’ve been top guys in the portal had they entered? 🤔🤦🏻‍♂️
Never said that.

In an earlier post, I described gaps we had in last year’s team:
- Perimeter defense
- Low post offense

These things allow for us to better weather cold 3 point shooting nights like what plagued us vs. UConn.

The shots that rimmed out were not some easy lay-ins. Whether that be Kylan, Andrej, or Mirk. If they were so easy why not dunk them instead of bringing the rim into question? There’s an athleticism gap here. Roddy Gayle, Burnett, and McKenney were 3 guards on Michigan that could dunk. And that’s before we even talk about the athleticism of their frontcourt with Yaxel and Morez.

Was it ideal for Keaton to go 2-10 from 3 launching 30ft’ers? Why didn’t we continue working the ball in and drawing fouls the way Michigan did? Cadeau shot the most free throws in the final.

We made the Final Four. No one is denying that achievement. We played 1 team seeded higher than 9 en route. Beating Houston in Houston extinguished a lot of the demons from the 2022 loss.

But we’ve now lost three straight times to UConn. One blowout. One comfortable win. And one that was within 2 possessions but never closer the entire second half. How much did Tarris Reed Jr hurt us with dunks and low post finishes? Have we addressed that gap?
 
Last edited:
#438      
The Office Thank You GIF


Wagler is a lotto pick. Vaaks was not. Both were/are rising sophomores. Kylan’s injury hurt his offense. But it’s a stretch to say Coleman as a freshman will be a clear upgrade.

And I expect some YoY improvement but Tomi actually declined YoY this past year. We’re banking a lot on step ups from Dre and Mirk. The YoY improvement could happen but it’s no guaranteed thing.

Ask Loyer and TKR.
Good point. We sort of assume all our returning players will get better. But that's not always the case.
 
#442      
Meanwhile Freshman Jamar Smith smoothly buries another 3 at a near 50% clip...

McBride also shot threes over 40% at Alfonso Plummer volume, and a young Shaun Pruitt and Randle were nothing to scoff at. Team had talent, they were just young outside Dee, Augie, and Rich. And they were a Top 20 offensive team in the nation that year.

Some of the takes in this thread are bizarre. What are we doing here? We could sign the 90s Bulls to the roster this year and people would be angry Dickey Simpkins was on the roster instead of going after Charles Barkley to back up Mirk for 10min
Don’t pretend the above isn’t an exaggerating also. Only McBride got above 9 points per game (10.0). All those guys you mentioned were one dimensional even if they had roles to play. I enjoyed that team but my point was don’t compare it to this one.
 
#443      
So we should have gone to the portal instead of retaining our guys who all would’ve been top guys in the portal had they entered? 🤔🤦🏻‍♂️
Nope that is not what any one wants. I think what people are saying is we would just like one more role player like Justin Harmon. Someone who has played college basketball, has experience and is willing to get a good pay raise and have a bench role. I know some insiders compared Brandon Lee to Andre Feliz last year. Well that didn’t happen. All people are trying to say is yes Keaton was amazing and we got lucky since Petro sucked. But what if we get a year like when we had Skyy and Jayden Epps. If that is Coleman then this team is not making the final four. That is what people are trying to say on this board. We all trust the staff but I have seen people say that after Skyy and Epps year Brad wasn’t going to trust freshman and now he is trusting that freshman are going to be big contributors. Now we are back to hoping 3 freshman are great.
 
#447      
I don’t think starting Jake was the problem….most efficient offense was with Jake on the court.
agreed that offense will be number 1 and by big margin since Purdue isn't gonna be around. likely setting the kenpom record if mirk and stojakavic take the steps I expect. that alone can get you to final four. Alabama has done it

I'm concerned a bit at defending small guards again. Boswell had issues there last year but was disruptive at points and always wanted that assignment. I don't think we have answered that question for next year. stojakavic showed promise but once again would have trouble against the small guards
 
#449      
I could see Coleman playing the Andrej role of coming off the bench. Jake starts but Coleman still gets the most minutes.

That will not make the "jake is only a forward" folks happy.

We really gotta move on from thinking about Brad's system as fitting neatly into 1-5 where each position is traditionally defined.
 
#450      
Why do you think they went after Blackwell? The staff can recruit/want all the talent in the world. The players have to want it too.
I know BU and staff tried to get Blackwell. I give credit for going for it.

I am assuming this is a Top 5 team as put together right now? You agree?

If Coleman and Morillo do well (which, I think they can), then the team is even stronger.

Question for me is: did other schools get that much better for next year as well? Maybe Florida?

I am hoping the Illini can stay with these teams in the Top Ten like this past year.
 
Back