1m4tr
Cliffmas
It will. It really will.
Michigan, Florida, the Utah Jazz, Charlotte hornets, Washington Generals
That would be walking into a losing situation...
Best part of the episode (if I recall correctly) was Krusty complaining (after losing all the money he raised through franchising his name) that the game was a fix due to a ladder being used.
Slips on my orange tinted sunglasses, kicks back with a good whiskey and just smiles. The dream of the Bulls hiring Malone, leaving North Carolina screwed from mass exodus. North Carolina then hires McCollum which also screws Iowa causing mass exodus. Malone fails miserably and gets fired and in April of 2027 the Bulls hire Dusty May which screws Michigan. Sighs , one can only dream.
And what I'd read on the transfer front was that there would be one freebie, and then the graduate transfer and if-your-coach-leaves exemptions would still apply, but they would get rid of hardship waivers.My understanding of the 5 in 5 rule is that injuries/red shirts will go away. You get 5 years. Period. A big part of the reason NCAA is pursuing is so they don't have to rule on eligibility anymore. The rule would make things very simple... at least once the initial madness is cleared up.
He's spinning it on his finger! Just take it!Best part of the episode (if I recall correctly) was Krusty complaining (after losing all the money he raised through franchising his name) that the game was a fix due to a ladder being used.
Best part of the episode (if I recall correctly) was Krusty complaining (after losing all the money he raised through franchising his name) that the game was a fix due to a ladder being used.
That's a good plan B if you don't have sorghum molasses handy.grits and maple syrup...........yum yum............
Iowa St, Houston, Arizona all get back guys as good if not clearly better than Hummer & Boswell. Plus we have to endure another year of Smith at Purdue.
Also do we see Morez all over again with Brad playing Ben over Morillo (assuming he doesn't just ask out of his commitment).
Cannot speak to his defense, but the man literally fractured his shooting hand in January. I personally do not believe he ever recovered from the injury. A summer getting fully healthy, and I would expect him to be an asset if he were allowed to return.I HATE the proposed rule change. HATE it. That means it’s probably going to pass. Maybe I’m overreacting. Wouldn’t be the first time. This really hurts Illinois, in my opinion.
One of the big advantages we had by retaining our players was the built in comraderie and chemistry we had.
Well, if everyone is about to regain the services of multiple players, that negates, in large part anyway, what we accomplished through the retention.
Oh, and I’m sure I’ll get pushback on this but screw it. Kylan Boswell was not a good player last year. He couldn’t shoot. He was so horrific (along with Andrej) that we couldn’t afford both of them on the floor all that much. That’s why Jake Davis was starting.
And defensively he stunk. Quality guards were taking him behind the woodshed on a regular basis.
To finish the season, he had ONE basket total in the last THREE games. He was terrible. Illinois made the Final Four in spite of Kylan Boswell, not because of him. As I said yesterday, if the staff had left Boswell on Bennett Stirtz our season would have ended. Boswell was getting destroyed.
I don’t know. What would we really be getting back? An awful shooter who’s defense, at least this past season, was VASTLY overrated, or as I prefer to call it, bad.
To quote Pat Benatar, “Hit me with your best shot! Fire away.”
If you want to win a Natty, you gotta beat everyone. You put together a great squad (we’ve done that) and you play it out. With Boswell and assuming no defections, I ain’t scared, of anyone. Anyone. Same basic team, Final Four experience, let’s GO!Adding Boswell is objectively a net positive.
I still think the 5/5 rule would hurt our teams chances next year just because of the strength it would add to other teams.
I HATE the proposed rule change. HATE it. That means it’s probably going to pass. Maybe I’m overreacting. Wouldn’t be the first time. This really hurts Illinois, in my opinion.
One of the big advantages we had by retaining our players was the built in comraderie and chemistry we had.
Well, if everyone is about to regain the services of multiple players, that negates, in large part anyway, what we accomplished through the retention.
Oh, and I’m sure I’ll get pushback on this but screw it. Kylan Boswell was not a good player last year. He couldn’t shoot. He was so horrific (along with Andrej) that we couldn’t afford both of them on the floor all that much. That’s why Jake Davis was starting.
And defensively he stunk. Quality guards were taking him behind the woodshed on a regular basis.
To finish the season, he had ONE basket total in the last THREE games. He was terrible. Illinois made the Final Four in spite of Kylan Boswell, not because of him. As I said yesterday, if the staff had left Boswell on Bennett Stirtz our season would have ended. Boswell was getting destroyed.
I don’t know. What would we really be getting back? An awful shooter who’s defense, at least this past season, was VASTLY overrated, or as I prefer to call it, bad.
To quote Pat Benatar, “Hit me with your best shot! Fire away.”
If he can return to the defense we saw two years ago, there’s value there. I have no idea what happened this past season on that end of the floor. It wasn’t good.Cannot speak to his defense, but the man literally fractured his shooting hand in January. I personally do not believe he ever recovered from the injury. A summer getting fully healthy, and I would expect him to be an asset if he were allowed to return.
However, you are completely entitled to your opinion.
Mirk at the 2? We wouldn't be able to guard anyone...Vaaks, Mirk, Z, Tomi, Kofi
My brother in Christ, adding another year for the homegrown, worth his weight in chemistry gold, veteran “captain” who was selfless and team-focused in helping train the younger guys would be nothing but a positive across the board.I HATE the proposed rule change. HATE it. That means it’s probably going to pass. Maybe I’m overreacting. Wouldn’t be the first time. This really hurts Illinois, in my opinion.
One of the big advantages we had by retaining our players was the built in comraderie and chemistry we had.
Well, if everyone is about to regain the services of multiple players, that negates, in large part anyway, what we accomplished through the retention.
Oh, and I’m sure I’ll get pushback on this but screw it. Kylan Boswell was not a good player last year. He couldn’t shoot. He was so horrific (along with Andrej) that we couldn’t afford both of them on the floor all that much. That’s why Jake Davis was starting.
And defensively he stunk. Quality guards were taking him behind the woodshed on a regular basis.
To finish the season, he had ONE basket total in the last THREE games. He was terrible. Illinois made the Final Four in spite of Kylan Boswell, not because of him. As I said yesterday, if the staff had left Boswell on Bennett Stirtz our season would have ended. Boswell was getting destroyed.
I don’t know. What would we really be getting back? An awful shooter who’s defense, at least this past season, was VASTLY overrated, or as I prefer to call it, bad.
To quote Pat Benatar, “Hit me with your best shot! Fire away.”
If Boswell came back, he would be back with his eyes fully wide open, with an honest conversation with Underwood.Lets just say Boz does come back .
We were concerned about minutes with Blackwell , wont this be the same problem ?
On the other hand, an EDG returning for a third season in the system as a super senior would be an incredible asset if healthy. I think this is an entirely different scenario than bringing in a one-year mercenary who was being recruited for a different role who wanted to handle the ball more.Lets just say Boz does come back .
We were concerned about minutes with Blackwell , wont this be the same problem ?
Blackwell would've been a threat to usage for Andrej (and our other starters) in addition to being a threat to playing time for anyone vying for a starting spot (a good problem to have if everyone's on board, and evidently they weren't).Lets just say Boz does come back .
We were concerned about minutes with Blackwell , wont this be the same problem ?
Considering character and leadership, do you think he’d take slightly lesser usage (helping develop Coleman, Morillo, Brown)? Or do we think he’d go back to being starter?On the other hand, a EDG returning for a third season in the system as a super senior would be an incredible asset if healthy. I think this is an entirely different scenario than bringing in a one-year mercenary who was being recruited for a different role who wanted to handle the ball more.
I believe a healthy Boswell on the team next year would be a pleasant surprise. If the rules don't change, I believe we will still be fine.
Agreed. But we have no idea if Boswell would even want to return if the rule were to be passed.On the other hand, an EDG returning for a third season in the system as a super senior would be an incredible asset if healthy. I think this is an entirely different scenario than bringing in a one-year mercenary who was being recruited for a different role who wanted to handle the ball more.
I believe a healthy Boswell on the team next year would be a pleasant surprise. If the rules don't change, I believe we will still be fine.