Maryland was missing two big men and started three freshman against the most experienced team in the Big Ten. No problem, because they knew from game film that we (a) can stop penetration, (b) have no interior defense, (c) can't feed the post and (d) rely too much on threes. Knowing those things makes for a pretty easy game plan, especially when you have multiple players who can both drive and shoot.
Meanwhile, we knew they would be lacking two big men and be starting inexperienced players. We, however, had very few post feeds, and were unable to pressure their guards because of our aforementioned lack of perimeter defense.
Our roster is full of players with a single skill: rebounding OR shooting OR dribbling OR defense (wait, scratch that last one, nobody is good at that). Meanwhile, the teams we face have players with multiple skills -- dribble AND shooting, rebounding AND defense, etc. And they combine that with game plans to maximize their skills, and hide their deficiencies. Lacking big men on defense? Double the ball in the post and make our bigs pass out. Oh, wait, our bigs can't do that. Lacking big men to feed on offense? Run pick-and-roll all day, or just run right past our guards for layup after layup.
This loss was not on Tate or on our shooting or on our interior defense. This was a program loss, starting with recruiting that missed on multi-skilled prospects and instead filled the roster with role-players, continuing with a lack of player and skill development over several years, and concluding up with ineffective game planning and poor in-game coaching and adjustments.
I'm not even angry as I type this. We've been seeing this for years now. And we'll see more of it for the next few months, at least. There is no fix by putting in Lucas, or AJ or Kipper. There is no fix by switching to more zone. The only fix is from changing the program and starting over. Again.