Yes for one year 1991 that was Durham last year on Bulls radio I thinkDid he do Bulls color commentary? Maybe with Jim Durham?
Yes for one year 1991 that was Durham last year on Bulls radio I thinkDid he do Bulls color commentary? Maybe with Jim Durham?
Pretty much what I was thinking. Guess there’s always a remote chance given Wagler is “qualified” and has Illini ties, but it does feel like the top 4 are locked in except for the specific order.close to 0 bc top 4 is consensus. i do think wagler will be top 3 player in the draft but gms dont like to make risky moves. he will gone by 6. 5 most likely.
His "Hakeem Pct" stat is interesting as well. This stat measures defensive disruption (the percentage a possession ends with a steal or a block by the player).Stats comparison of the "Big 4" point guards:
View attachment 50272
What stands out with Wagler is that OREB%.
That would be a typical pick for the Bulls @15 if true...hopefully doesn't happen...Latest ESPN mock draft (post-lottery) has Bulls taking Caleb Wilson at #4 and Wagler going to the Clippers at #5. They also have Kentucky C Jayden Quaintance, who only played 4 games this season, going to Chicago at #15. They also have Boswell going to the Bulls late in the 2nd round.
KB has to play on the same team as Boyd.
As a Pistons fan, let me just say that’s all you need for weathering the storm. It might not be a full worst to first by next year, but getting the right building block sets everything in motion! This year has been a fever dreamAs a Wizards fan who can finally see light at the end of the endless tanking tunnel...
View attachment 50265
Edit:
Still only 18 years old. Huge upside. Gotta be very confident with the medicals though.That would be a typical pick for the Bulls @15 if true...hopefully doesn't happen...
The Bulls had better not overcomplicate just taking whoever of the clear top 4 falls to them.BG not necessarily tied to Giddey. Think that Wagler would get plenty of opportunity to show his orchestration skills.
He was really good as a 17-year-old freshman (7.9 rebounds and 2.6 blocks per game...at 17 years old), and even with the injury could probably have gone top-10 in the 2025 draft if it wasn't for the fact he was too young to be eligible. Makes a lot more sense for that #15 pick for the Bulls, a team that is not in any likely scenario competing for anything next season, to take a swing on a young high upside guy like Quaintance than to go for something safe.That would be a typical pick for the Bulls @15 if true...hopefully doesn't happen...
Wow! Just that one year? I'm pretty sure I never saw his playing days. When I was a kid, Artis Gilmore was my favorite player on the Bulls.Yes for one year 1991 that was Durham last year on Bulls radio I think
Tied to Giddey or no, PG is probably the position at which they have the most depth and talent. There is absolutely no need for them to over-think it. Take whichever of the top 4 are left, and worry about what you want at 15 based on complimenting whichever elite prospect just landed in your lap.BG not necessarily tied to Giddey. Think that Wagler would get plenty of opportunity to show his orchestration skills.
All of the parts of this process that aren't delivering under pressure in 5-on-5 basketball with stakes on the outcome are going to tend to reward the guys other than Wagler, be ready for that.
The problem with drafting Acuff at 5 if you’re LA is that you’re kinda drafting Darius Garland 2.0 to eventually be better than Darius Garland down the line. Just too much overlap there.Acuff measured better than expected. 6'2 barefoot and 6'7 wingspan.
I think this gives him a good chance to take the 5th spot over Keaton but it's either or. can't go wrong with this choices. Keatons size, poise, shooting and decision making vs the unreal explosiveness and scoring of Acuff.
agreed with that and heard that's why Keaton is perfect for them. heard clippers could move this pick as well. or try and get into the top 4 but I doubt that happens.The problem with drafting Acuff at 5 if you’re LA is that you’re kinda drafting Darius Garland 2.0 to eventually be better than Darius Garland down the line. Just too much overlap there.
Wagler has a lot more on/off ball versatility.
Is Flemings all that better?Wagler's measurements are a bit unfortunate. I hope it doesn't hurt him- but his lack of explosion and being 6'5 instead of 6'6, and only a 6'6.25 wingspan- isn't ideal
Is this going to be like that LSU OT a few years ago where there was a huge debate on draft position because his arms were 34 7/8 “ instead of 35”?Wagler's measurements are a bit unfortunate. I hope it doesn't hurt him- but his lack of explosion and being 6'5 instead of 6'6, and only a 6'6.25 wingspan- isn't ideal
Apparently our guys aren’t athletic