TJL and Kipper are two very good freshmen. These two don't back down.
I get it everyone loves TJL but in all reality his plus minus today was worse than Tate's. Not one of these PGs should start or play a lot of minutes right now. Not often a team has PGs and none of them are scorers. That's the amazing part right now
One of the most telling moments of how the team feels about Groce and themselves was when JCL threw a behind the back pass down 14 in the backcourt that flew out of bounds. What? Who does this besides players that just don't care.
One of the most telling moments of how the team feels about Groce and themselves was when JCL threw a behind the back pass down 14 in the backcourt that flew out of bounds. What? Who does this besides players that just don't care.
I thought the same thing. Hensen would have yanked the guy out and sat him right next to him on the nench just to keep giving the guy an earfull. John is sometimes too soft with that stuff.Very rec league-esque pass.
TJL and Kipper are two very good freshmen. These two don't back down.
This! Has anyone else noticed how horrible the out of bounds plays are? Not to mention the press breaker (irrelevant today but still)TJL is best PG, hands down. System blows and Groce doesn't adapt. Unfortunate since this conference is weak. Win BTT!
I thought the same thing. Hensen would have yanked the guy out and sat him right next to him on the nench just to keep giving the guy an earfull. John is sometimes too soft with that stuff.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
+1000
Using immediate bench time as a teaching tool seems a proven method. Henson certainly used it. Izzo uses it (did you see him in the recent MSU/PU game.), even MCafferty almost benched all his starters for second half tip last week. I can't recall ever seeing Groce use it mid game.
This JCL pass was clearly a time to use it.....so was PSU getting a layup essentially 1 on 5 in the first half. Maybe an inbound pay or two as well.
TJL and Kipper are two very good freshmen. These two don't back down.
I found the Werner Tweet on +/-:
Tate 0 in 15 min
Lucas -7 in 25 min
Abrams -9 in 15 min
Nice find, but I don't think it says much other than we have serious problems at PG... Tate's assist total (3) tell that he happened to be in at the right time when Hill, Morgan, Nichols, and JCL were shooting shots that went in. That said, TJL with 3 assists in 25 minutes was bad, too. He wasn't a difference maker except for that back-to-back run-outs period of the game when he was electric.
I thought the same thing. Hensen would have yanked the guy out and sat him right next to him on the nench just to keep giving the guy an earfull. John is sometimes too soft with that stuff.
Once, back in the Flyin' Illini days, Larry Smith came down in the middle of a three-on-one and threw a perfect behind the back pass to Nick Anderson who flushed it. Henson immediately yanked Smith. Afterwards I asked Lou why he pulled him when the pass was perfect, and he said "I've only seen two guys I'd allow to throw it behind their back, Magic and Maravich, and he's not either one of them."
LOL at... "Was a combo guard coming out of HS," implying he had PG skills out of HS. I have said many times, that whenever I read "combo" with respect to HS recruits, the vast majority of the times it means a player who "should" be playing PG, but does not have PG skills.
JCL is very good shooter, has great form, but I have seen nothing to indicate that he can ever develop into a PG, under any coach. JMO.
Let it not be said that our kids don't have heart.
What would be the downside of Malcolm taking Lucas' rest minutes at PG, with Finke or Nichols, say, filling the gap?
The downside is losing the ball. Hill is not a ball handler and for the life of me I cannot understand why people on here think he is.
Just finished the game, I was out, so I had to watch it delayed. This post will ramble a little bit, so skip it if you please. I certainly don't have the track record of some of our more illustrious posters.
I teach high school English and Theatre. I took two years off while my daughter completed her senior year in high school and her first year in college. In those two years, I watched someone else direct the program, never thinking I would go back.
As I watched their work, I was so dismayed that there was so much talent, talent that I had worked with, that was left on the stage in mediocre shows. I knew the actors in our school had worlds more talent than what was being shown.
This is the game I just watched. Our players decided to let their talent take over, and almost prevailed, despite the lackluster direction they are being given. We should have won this game easily...we have better players. What we don't have is better coaching.