The way both OL and DL is playing so soft Michigan will have a field day35-31 good guys, guaranteed.
I think we are a more dangerous team without Chase. We won’t be as predictable and will spread it out and let Tommy show what he can doIf Chase Brown is out the line will go over 20.
I think we all need to sleep on this disappointing day and wake up with our heads on a bit straighter.I think we are a more dangerous team without Chase.
Brings to mind a famous quote attributed to Col. Creighton Abrams (and to an anonymous medic) at Bastogne in WWII: “They’ve got us surrounded again, the poor bastards”. There is advantage to being underestimated. We need to leverage it with the right attitude.total trap game for scUM. we got them right where we want them boys! /s
GO ILLINI!
Didn’t say better said more dangerous. I rather have Chase in the line up and he is our best/consistent playerI think we all need to sleep on this disappointing day and wake up with our heads on a bit straighter.
The only thing this team is more dangerous to without Chase Brown is my liverDidn’t say better said more dangerous. I rather have Chase in the line up and he is our best/consistent player
That's the spirit.35-31 good guys, guaranteed.
Unfortunately, Minnesota broke through yesterday. So this annoymaly is over.That's the spirit.
I've should add, there is the weird quirk this year that no one who has beaten Nebraska this year has won their next game.
If that holds up here, it will shock the world.
That was disappointingly ineffective yesterday.Barge formation time.
Who are the RBs for the scUM game is CB and JM can't go? RL3, CH and Jordan Anderson?In the unlikely event that we beat both Michigan and Northwestern, in this scenario we just need Purdue to lose one if its last two?? Since we would hold the tiebreaker against everyone except Purdue? Sorry, I have full jugs of Orange Koolaid since bball is starting, so still a bit delusional about our chances.
My response from other thread. Three potential scenarios for Illini to win West. Right now Iowa is in driver's seat.In the unlikely event that we beat both Michigan and Northwestern, in this scenario we just need Purdue to lose one if its last two?? Since we would hold the tiebreaker against everyone except Purdue? Sorry, I have full jugs of Orange Koolaid since bball is starting, so still a bit delusional about our chances.
Interestingly within the West, nobody controls their own destiny, which is stunning with only 2 games left.
Illinois scenarios to win West:
1) Illini win out and Iowa wins out, regardless of what Purdue does. This would result in 3-team tie if all three teams win out. All three teams would have the same record among each other (1-1), and would move to second tiebreaker (division record), which Illini win.
2) Illini win out and Purdue loses one game. Illini hold all tiebreaker over other potential teams
3) Illini win one game does not matter who, though likely NW; Purdue loses one game; MN beats Iowa but loses to Wisc; Wisc wins out; Iowa loses to MN but beats Nebraska. Result is a 5 way tie for first. Illini win tiebreaker based on common record among tied teams (3-1).
Did not breakdown what happens if Iowa loses to Nebraska, but I think we would lose out to Purdue in 4 way tie involving MN, Wisc, and Purdue.
Crazy stuff!
Assuming Illini lose to Mich, looks like Iowa controls own destiny.
I think you mean more unpredictable, not more dangerous.Didn’t say better said more dangerous. I rather have Chase in the line up and he is our best/consistent player
This reminds me of the crazy end of season scenarios last year for us to sneak into just a crappy bowl game through the back door. Much more significant this year. That's progress boys and girls.My response from other thread. Three potential scenarios for Illini to win West. Right now Iowa is in driver's seat.
I really expected it to be more than 17, especially if Chase is out.
nahI really expected it to be more than 17, especially if Chase is out.