Pregame: Illinois vs Mississippi State, Monday, January 2nd, 11:00am CT, ESPN2

Status
Not open for further replies.
#151      

CleaverName

Chicago but not there anymore
I agree. I am conflicted on this trend. It would be like me calling in sick on my last day of work before i retire because i don’t want to risk dying in a car accident on my commute and ruining my retirement. That wouldn’t fly.
You must have a more dangerous commute than I do !
 
#153      

mhuml32

Cincinnati, OH
Mississippi State starting WR Rara Thomas has entered the transfer portal. Already, several SEC teams are making a bid for him.

I assume this means he won’t play in our game?

That's a blow to their passing game.
 
#154      
That's a blow to their passing game.
Beavis And Butthead 90S Tv GIF
 
#155      
I agree. I am conflicted on this trend. It would be like me calling in sick on my last day of work before i retire because i don’t want to risk dying in a car accident on my commute and ruining my retirement. That wouldn’t fly.

I don't this analogy works unless your job is gladiatorial combat and your "retirement" is more gladiatorial combat.

Kids don't sit out Bowl Games because the NFL is easier. They sit out because if they drop in the draft because of injury, they can miss out on millions of dollars worth of signing bonuses.

I only dislike players sitting out if they could actually *improve* their stock by playing. And those kinds of decisions come after numerous conversations with coaches, family, friends, etc.
 
Last edited:
#156      
My question is when does the trend of not playing spread to something like basketball? If you are a sure first rounder on a team unlikely to win the tournament ( think Ja Morant) why should you play.
Remember Martin broke his leg in the conference tournament. So basketball is not immune to this

 
#158      

Mr. Tibbs

southeast DuPage
Mississippi State starting WR Rara Thomas has entered the transfer portal. Already, several SEC teams are making a bid for him.

I assume this means he won’t play in our game?
well, you cant serve two masters
 
#163      

IlliniCardinal

Minneapolis
i understand why kids sit out of bowl games, but it just kinda stinks to have all this hope as a fan to get to a bowl game and then for some to sit out. Again, I understand it, but kind of a bummer as a fan.

I have no info at all, just complaining on a Monday morning.
Maybe there should be NIL bonuses for certain (or all) players that play in bowl games, in addition to insurance policies.
 
#164      

IlliniCardinal

Minneapolis
Yet, unless you are a big donor you aren't guaranteed tickets if you go that way and you won't know for several days if you will get them:

Everyone who request tickets will be notified by Sunday,
December 11th at 5:00pm to confirm if their request has been fulfilled.
Submitting a ticket request does not guarantee an order.

Should demand exceed supply for any price level, the order will be fulfilled at the next available price.
The Division of Intercollegiate Athletics reserves the right to reduce or cancel any order.
You will get tickets, though you may not get them in your zone. You will be sure your purchase directly supports the Illini.

One solution is to give more to the I Fund!
 
#165      
-- Maybe NIL can buy insurance policies for bowl game players who are entering NFL draft
-- Maybe NIL can offer appearance bonus for players to play in games (do PR work at game?)
-- I know its hard to wait but if I was starter who was going to enter the transfer portal I would play to get exposure then enter the portal afterwards

I can't imagine its good for the bowl to have the biggest stars sit out the game.
 
#166      

Illini2010-11

Sugar Grove
-- Maybe NIL can buy insurance policies for bowl game players who are entering NFL draft
-- Maybe NIL can offer appearance bonus for players to play in games (do PR work at game?)
-- I know its hard to wait but if I was starter who was going to enter the transfer portal I would play to get exposure then enter the portal afterwards

I can't imagine its good for the bowl to have the biggest stars sit out the game.
While I agree in general premise with these ideas, there are a lot of logistical hurdles for inking these sorts of NIL deals. In reality, there are only a handful of bowls that are meaningful in any way, that this would even make sense from both sides. Once the playoff gets expanded, I only see those games, or NY6 equivalent games being justifiable for these sorts of NIL deals (due to extra wear and tear of additional games), which would likely come from sponsors of bowls for non-playoff games.

The reality is that lower-tier bowls would simply not be justifiable to have these sorts of NIL deals, as getting an NFL caliber player to play in Detroit, for example, would not move the needle for people to watch the game in person or on the tv set. The fact of the matter is that the shear volume of bowl games has diluted the value of a majority of the bowls, which also makes these sorts of NIL deals infeasible. I also do not think people attend most bowl games for watching specific players, but rather go for the experience.
 
Last edited:
#167      

LGIllini

La Grange, IL
Dumb question alert: If a player has already entered the portal and committed to a new program, are they available to play in the bowl game for their prior/current team?
 
#168      

Illini2010-11

Sugar Grove
Dumb question alert: If a player has already entered the portal and committed to a new program, are they available to play in the bowl game for their prior/current team?
Technically they are still available to play for prior/current team. Though I see no reason for the old coaches to want them to play (or the new coach for that matter).

 
#169      
While I agree in general premise with these ideas, there are a lot of logistical hurdles for inking these sorts of NIL deals. In reality, there are only a handful of bowls that are meaningful in any way, that this would even make sense from both sides. Once the playoff gets expanded, I only see those games, or NY6 equivalent games being justifiable for these sorts of NIL deals (due to extra wear and tear of additional games), which would likely come from sponsors of bowls for non-playoff games.

The reality is that lower-tier bowls would simply not be justifiable to have these sorts of NIL deals, as getting an NFL caliber player to play in Detroit, for example, would not move the needle for people to watch the game in person or on the tv set. The fact of the matter is that the shear volume of bowl games has diluted the value of a majority of the bowls, which also makes these sorts of NIL deals infeasible. I also do not think people attend most bowl games for watching specific players, but rather go for the experience.
Imagine DeVito, Chase Brown, Newton, Randolph, Weatherspoon, and Sydney Brown all skipped the bowl game

Would you want to watch Sitowski and our 2nd string defense play vs. MSU 2nd string
 
#170      

Illini2010-11

Sugar Grove
Imagine DeVito, Chase Brown, Newton, Randolph, Weatherspoon, and Sydney Brown all skipped the bowl game

Would you want to watch Sitowski and our 2nd string defense play vs. MSU 2nd string
Of course I would rather see our best vs their best. However, my position is that if all of these players were to sit out, I do not think it would have an overly negative impact on those who were already willing to travel and attend the game. Those who are going to watch the game on television are still going to watch the game, albeit maybe not as intensely. As a fan, I would always want to see the best players playing in bowl games, but I understand the delicacies on why players make strategic decision to sit out bowl games.

I was simply responding to the thought that NIL deals would be the magical cure to players sitting out bowl games. I think it could work in certain scenarios (generally in higher tier bowl games where there is substantially more money at play and these sorts of deals make sense), but the largest hurdle is the value of the deals/cost of insurance in these "lower-tier" bowl games. What is the fair market value of the insurance payout (the fair market value may be well below what players would expect or demand, should they get serious injury)? What is the cost of the premium to setup these policies, especially if a player demands an excessively inflated payout. Also the complexities of insurance packages may scare away a player from accepting for one game (background screenings, issues obtaining payout should injury occur, etc.) I believe there is some NIL package that will incentivize some to play (in our particular game it might work), but in general, I do not think blanket NIL deals will be enough to end the issue of players sitting out bowl games in general. I hope I am wrong, but this is a very complex issue. I for one am not going to sweat if a number of top tier players sit out non-playoff bowl games (each individual needs to make their optimal decision based upon the factors as they see them), as I am still going to watch these games, and it is still a great development for players that plan on suiting up for the team next year.

I do 100% agree with your comment on those who enter transfer portal before bowl game, but my guess is many of these players are trying to get a jumpstart on other players, and as long as they are not in the portal, they cannot be in "contact" with other coaches. These issues of players sitting out bowl games due to transfer or protecting draft stock are very complicated.
 
#171      

WWWWRocU

Herndon, VA
Imagine DeVito, Chase Brown, Newton, Randolph, Weatherspoon, and Sydney Brown all skipped the bowl game

Would you want to watch Sitowski and our 2nd string defense play vs. MSU 2nd string
I imagine this could be a reason why, as BB said in his presser, that the backups are getting first string and extra snaps in these practices.
 
#173      

illini80

Forgottonia
I imagine this could be a reason why, as BB said in his presser, that the backups are getting first string and extra snaps in these practices.
No matter who plays or the outcome, this is big for next season.
 
#174      

College Player Files $3M Claim with Lloyd’s for Drop in NFL Draft​


LOST LOV: A ONCE-BUSTLING MARKET FOR COLLEGE-ATHLETE INSURANCE FALLS ON HARD TIMES​



Players projected to be chosen in the first 3 rounds of the NFL Draft are eligible to purchase this insurance to protect against a career ending injury with a loan against their future income. The maximum pay-out is $10 million and can cost anywhere between $1000–8000 per $1 million insured depending on position and injury history. The loan is repayable either when the player signs a professional contract, a claim is made or the policy expires. This type of policy is also available privately and the only successful claim has been by Ed Chester in 1998.
 
#175      
Imagine DeVito, Chase Brown, Newton, Randolph, Weatherspoon, and Sydney Brown all skipped the bowl game

Would you want to watch Sitowski and our 2nd string defense play vs. MSU 2nd string

Agreed. It's reflective of the essential meaninglessness of the bowls and why no player on a playoff team sits out - no matter what their draft expectations. It's why the NFL Pro Bowl effectively ended because there was no point and only downside for players to participate. College Basketball doesn't have this problem for the obvious reason that anybody in the post season still has a shot at the title. I would imagine that the NIT has a similar problem with regard to stars sitting it out and preparing for the draft process instead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.