DanvIllini
Super Lurker
- Danville, IL
Probably just stats. Blue background. Orange lettering. Hopefully limited advertising during tv timeouts.
The sum is mind boggling but these things cost huge money. We have an essentially new building that should last as long as a new built from the ground up building would. I have supported renovation all along and am happy with the product to date. Will it be a 10? I don't know but it will be pretty darn close.
Those that did not support renovation must come from a different perspective than mine. I moved to C-U at age 9 just as the Assembly Hall was completed. It was a wonder then and the community was proud to have it. I attended many events there through the years but particularly as an undergraduate when many concerts were held there. I think we could get seats in the nose-bleed sections where the acoustics were great for just a few dollars in those days. I moved away but came back 10 years later and have been here ever since. The Assembly Hall has always been a symbol of this community and an inspiration for me.
Somewhere along the way, I gained a deep appreciation for architecture in general and came to know the architectural significance of this particular building. It holds a unique place not just in C-U and Illinois but in the world history of commercial architecture. this is not something that can be replicated and can easily be lost. It is something worth preserving for future generations and I am sorry if others can not see this the way I can.
I think if the product on the floor was a little different this year, all the upgrades in the arena would have looked a lot better. Funny how many flaws you can try to find in the remodel when you don't want to see the basketball being played on the hard wood.
Just guessing but I bet the people that wanted something new probably like Value City Arena. I like tradition with a huge modern touch. Just a personal preference of course. You can't make everyone happy.
I think if the product on the floor was a little different this year, all the upgrades in the arena would have looked a lot better. Funny how many flaws you can try to find in the remodel when you don't want to see the basketball being played on the hard wood.
I think this is a good point and a lot of the flaws that people are complaining about are things being addressed in this last phase. The restroom situation will be better when all are completed and the lack of a dedicated entrance and exit doors will become less salient. The concession stands will be better integrated into the building. There will be less grey concrete visible and the overall fit and finish will be complete.
Some of the other issues seem to be related to change in general. I think people will get used to not being able to walk the perimeter any more and it is not that big of a deal. The new seats are really not as bad as some make them out to be. I am sure there are some other things that fit in to this category as well.
One question I had regarding restrooms is something that some here will know. Do the premium seats with lounge/club areas have their own restrooms? I am assuming that they do and that this has helped the restroom situation tremendously.
I was at the Ohio State game and used the concourse restroom about 5 min. before the end of the first half. I had no line and was in and out quickly. It was a long way from my seat so having a couple more will be much better. I can see how if some waited til halftime that the current restroom situation would seem inadequate.
Nice post, thank you for taking the time.
I don't see how it could possibly cost that much. There are only a handful of basketball arenas in the world more expensive than that and they're not in rural Illinois.
Cant tear it down It on the State R. Thats why we had too get all Renovated parts approved...As I was originally considering our options for our facility, I came up with 3 options:
1 - Build a new state of the art BB facility for a cost of about $190 million (including the cost of the land). And air condition The Assembly Hall (for about $10 million), and figure out how to support it as well as the new BB building.
2 - Tear down the Assembly Hall and build a new General Purpose building that would be equivalent to the features of the Renovated SFC. Total cost of about $300 million (including the cost of removing the Assembly Hall).
3 - Renovating the SFC like what it is going to be 8 months from now for $170 million.
Now I think the $170 million is well spent. And wait to judge until you have toured the finished product.
As I was originally considering our options for our facility, I came up with 3 options:
1 - Build a new state of the art BB facility for a cost of about $190 million (including the cost of the land). And air condition The Assembly Hall (for about $10 million), and figure out how to support it as well as the new BB building.
2 - Tear down the Assembly Hall and build a new General Purpose building that would be equivalent to the features of the Renovated SFC. Total cost of about $300 million (including the cost of removing the Assembly Hall).
3 - Renovating the SFC like what it is going to be 8 months from now for $170 million.
Now I think the $170 million is well spent. And wait to judge until you have toured the finished product.
TOTAL cost. That includes the demolition of Assembly Hall. No ones going to demo it and haul off the millions of tons of concrete for free.
You're massively overestimating the cost of demolition. Millions of tons of concrete? Trump Tower Chicago is the largest concrete building in North America and it only weighs 365 thousand tons.
First, I think that was an exaggeration. Second, I thought at one point they released what the estimate was for the cost of demolishing and removing assembly hall. If me memory serves me well, I believe it was about $100 million. That's no chump change for getting rid of a building you no longer want.
That is an absolutely absurd estimate. No arena has ever cost that much to demolish. Old Yankee Stadium demolition was crazy expensive and that was only $22M.
First, I think that was an exaggeration. Second, I thought at one point they released what the estimate was for the cost of demolishing and removing assembly hall. If me memory serves me well, I believe it was about $100 million. That's no chump change for getting rid of a building you no longer want.
$22 mil, $100 mil, either way thats a large chunk of coin that would have had to of been added to the budget and was a major factor in choosing to renovate over a new build. Demolishing AH would be a major task compared to Yankee stadium. The estimates for tearing down the Astrodome are about $80 mil which would would be more similar to the AH. I think it would cost even more than that, closer to the $100 mil Proxy suggested. People don't realize how much of AH is actually below ground level. So absurd? I think not.
Well I guess we'll have to disagree then.
First of all, everyone balked at that price of demolition of the Astrodome. Part of the reason it's still standing. The Astrodome playing surface is also below ground elevation, btw, so I don't see a big difference there. Secondly, it's a significantly larger structure with 3-4 times the seating capacity in a metropolitan area.
$100 million? Is the building constructed entirely of compressed asbestos?
Anyways, I don't know that it would've needed to be torn down. Build a new stadium across the street, say in E-14 or the Terrace Fields across First Street, and keep Assembly Hall for concerts and other events. Buildings like St. John's Arena, Jenison Fieldhouse, Iowa Field House, and Wisconsin Field House are still around and being used for various purposes.
The Terrace Fields would've been an awesome location for a new basketball arena, visually connecting it to Memorial Stadium with the Grange Grove across the street. (I know, supposedly the south end zone will eventually be re-built and connected with the Assembly Hall area, but I'm not holding my breath.)