The Illinois Coaching Search

Status
Not open for further replies.
#3,451      
Looonnnggg time lurker...first post ever...I must say that this thread is super entertaining...here are my two cents...the various reports of offers to Monty or what's his name in Columbia are false...Whitman has been quiet and should be...he is not going to show his cards as he works behind the scenes...Illinois has other competition now for the headliners many of you have pointed out...but although we would like this coaching issue to be resolved now and not later, we all need to practice patience...my gut is telling me Whitman knows who he is pursuing...the pursuit of this coach will not get serious until that coach loses his tournament game...Will it be Bennett? Keats? Drew? Someone else? Who knows? Only Whitman knows...patience my brothers and sisters...my gut tells me we will be elated...very elated...and as my wife has told me..."you're gut instinct is rarely wrong"...however continue your debate, argument, and occasional meltdowns...have fun because in a few days Whitman in a bright orange tie will step to the podium and say "This is a great day to be an Illini as I introduce _______ as the new men's basketball coach...I-L-L

Now that's a good first post. I N I!
 
#3,454      
Respect you and your posts, but I don't think anyone is saying "we don't need a coach who can recruit". It seems that one side is saying "Cuonzo was not and still is not a top choice for us (noting that Cuonzo likely wouldn't have pulled Porter to UI)". And somehow the other side is saying "now what - Cuonzo went to a nearby school, whatever shall we do???"

A few points.

a) The emphasis on recruiting and the need to get a dynamic recruiter, or the importance of recruiting has been debated quite a bit. Recruiting is not a binary variable, there is a difference between a coach who can't recruit and a dynamic recruiter.

b) Having Ford/Cuonzo recruiting in our own backyard does increase intensity. It does have an effect, no doubt about that. It means is that it is even more important to get a dynamic recruiter. Does this change Whitman's strategy? I do not think anyone knows, since we do not know what his strategy was to begin with. Strategies may change, it is a dynamic environment. Coaches/jobs become available/unavailable all the time.

c) I can tell you with certainty that Porter Sr. and Cuonzo have had a pre-existing relationship. So as I had said in previous posts, Cuonzo was a critical factor, as was Romar when Porter Sr. moved across the country to CA. So while it is logical to think that Porter Sr. would have preferred Cuonzo/MO vs. Cuonzo/IL, there is absolutely no evidence to indicate that Porter Sr. was not going to send his son at UI if Cuonzo had indeed taken the UI job and he was offered the assistant position. The "Porter was not coming to IL" has no real basis.
 
#3,455      
Every post in this entire thread should start with "Not that anyone cares but..."

Even with all of the bickering going on in this thread, I love the ongoing discussion. It means we're passionate about the importance of this hire. I have a father who went to Purdue, a brother that went to Michigan State and now I have to sit and watch Northwestern make noise in the NCAA tournament. How in the hell did we get this low? I fault two people - Bruce Weber and John Groce. No matter who the pick is, I have confidence in JW to get a hire far superior to either one of them.
 
#3,456      

Illinifan533

Normal, Illinois
Winning helps recruiting, but good recruiters continue to pull talent for some time, even in other jobs. Travis Ford was in the hot seat, yet he pulled Jawun Evans. He got fired, with all the bad reputation that you talk about, and he just landed Goodwin and Carte'Are Gordon. You say Cuonzo is mediocre, but he is likely to land the top recruit in the nation. Even Groce, who IMO did not get great recruiting results, still pulled his best recruiting class on his way out.

If your assumption is that we can consistently win in the B1G in the next 3-4 years without significantly upgrading our talent, and that both Cuonzo and Ford will do terribly at their schools, and their recruiting prowess will stop and recruits will just divert to our program, I think you are making too many assumptions that are highly suspect.

If a coach can win consistently and compete in the B1G in the next few years while losing recruiting battles, then there is no worry whatsoever, even if Cuonzo/Ford succeed and continue to get recruits. It would mean that we have discovered the secret recipe of winning consistently in the B1G without much dependency on recruiting. Personally, I do not think that is likely to happen. I think we need a serious upgrade in talent to achieve that outcome, and we need a dynamic recruiter at the helm. JMO.


I am one for the idea that coaches that are good at Xs and Os AND developing players are better bets than high-profile recruiters. Yes, recruiting top talent here would be great, and one usually needs elite talent to make deep runs in the Tournament. Bo Ryan is a prime example of what one can do with player development, but his best Wisconsin teams had NBA draft picks (i.e. Kaminsky and Dekker). Someone mentioned earlier that Marshall's Final Four team also had NBA talent. However, the point I was trying to make (and failed to express clearly) is that in the long-term, Cuonzo and Ford will probably fizzle out and be fired from their respective jobs in a few years, while if Illinois makes the right hire, hopefully will be able to sustain longer success, which would probably be in part to their ability to win enough recruiting battles in the area. But again, I just love me some Orange Koo-Laid :thumb:
 
#3,457      
The only things that have changed since Whitman's press conference are:
1) Martin to Mizzou
2) Indiana job opening

That's it. Literally everything else is message board nonsense. Whitman may have had his guy since the press conference - waiting for said guy's season to end. Or maybe not.

I'm loving all the reading here - but we have learned nothing. Nothing has changed.

It's good to see somebody gets it. You're so wise. Like a miniature, Buddha covered in hair.
 
#3,458      
I still believe Cuonzo picked Mizzou because that choice came with the #1 recruit ... Not that Cuonzo picked MZ and then immediately "landed" the #1 recruit. The next MZ coach was going to hire Michael Sr to get Michael Jr. And if Michael Sr wasn't a fan of a candidate, I'm not sure said candidate gets the job. Perfect storm for CM - perhaps so perfect he spurned JW. But not an option that was available to UI.

Again, Porter Sr. has a strong relationship with Cuonzo. Porter Sr. moved across the country because of his relationship with Romar. The theory that Porter Sr. was calling all the shots for the Mizzou AD and whole Mizzou administration (especially given their problems on campus) holds no water. Cuonzo is actually a very good choice for Mizzou, they could not have done much better IMO. Porter Sr. was not calling the shots on this search, just that Mizzou gets the added benefit of the nations' top recruit (assuming he ends up there).
 
#3,459      

Illinifan533

Normal, Illinois
What is there to be in favor of?

In comparison to Monty Williams, whom everyone here seemingly would love to have, I don't see much of a difference based on their NBA coaching records. Mitchell had .433 winning percentage while Williams had a .439 percentage in only 33 fewer games coached. I'm not advocating for Mitchell, but I don't see how'd be any worse than Monty.
 
#3,460      
Watched Iowa St vs. Nevada. Like both teams and coaches...a lot. Read Steve Prohm's profile and remembered his time at Murray St. Very impressive. He would be an exceptional hire! And Mussleman is unique with all of the NBA experience. He has moved around a lot but I think he could sell his pro experience pretty effectively.. I still like Keatts but feel good about the potential Tier 2s on our list.
 
#3,461      
Watched Iowa St vs. Nevada. Like both teams and coaches...a lot. Read Steve Prohm's profile and remembered his time at Murray St. Very impressive. He would be an exceptional hire! And Mussleman is unique with all of the NBA experience. He has moved around a lot but I think he could sell his pro experience pretty effectively.. I still like Keatts but feel good about the potential Tier 2s on our list.

I just don't feel like Musselman is a fit or would be a JW guy. Not much to base it on, other than Musselman seems to have some showman Bruce Pearl to him and JW feels like a no nonsense guy. Plus I hated Nevada's defense tonight. It was a layup and dunk drill for Iowa st.

Prohm was much more interesting to me. I liked what I saw from ISU and my only concern with him is recruiting
 
#3,463      
I am one for the idea that coaches that are good at Xs and Os AND developing players are better bets than high-profile recruiters. Yes, recruiting top talent here would be great, and one usually needs elite talent to make deep runs in the Tournament. Bo Ryan is a prime example of what one can do with player development, but his best Wisconsin teams had NBA draft picks (i.e. Kaminsky and Dekker). Someone mentioned earlier that Marshall's Final Four team also had NBA talent. However, the point I was trying to make (and failed to express clearly) is that in the long-term, Cuonzo and Ford will probably fizzle out and be fired from their respective jobs in a few years, while if Illinois makes the right hire, hopefully will be able to sustain longer success, which would probably be in part to their ability to win enough recruiting battles in the area. But again, I just love me some Orange Koo-Laid :thumb:

If you look at Illini basketball history, the periods when the Illini were consistently very good, not just for a season here and there (i.e., 80s and 99-05) miraculously coincide with periods when Illini talent was at a whole different level. It is no coincidence. Bo Ryan was a great coach, but he is more of an exception. That is why people actually constantly bring Bo Ryan up and not other coaches. Good luck trying to find the next Bo Ryan.

As far as mid-major coaches, there have been many good X's and O's coaches who failed miserably at the next level. Much of it had to do with recruiting. I think Marshall is a good coach, but I still have doubts he can be successful at the next level, unless he can get the extra help in recruiting from a "name" school. That is why I believe Indiana makes sense for Marshall, but I do not think he would be a great fit at Illinois.

BTW, Sam Dekker was a 5*, top 20 recruit (#19 RSCI), so if that means consistently getting talented players like Dekker, I am all for it.
 
#3,464      

Illinifan533

Normal, Illinois
Prohm was much more interesting to me. I liked what I saw from ISU and my only concern with him is recruiting

For this board's information on any future recruiting concerns on Prohm, he was the head coach responsible for recruiting current Chicago Bull Cameron Payne when he was at Murray State, so the NBA pedigree is there.

Prohm would be an intriguing hire. I haven't had a chance to watch Iowa State since he took over, but his Racer teams liked to run the floor and had some great athletes. I'd be thrilled if he came to Illinois.
 
#3,465      

EJ33

San Francisco
giphy.gif
 
#3,466      
I just don't feel like Musselman is a fit or would be a JW guy. Not much to base it on, other than Musselman seems to have some showman Bruce Pearl to him and JW feels like a no nonsense guy. Plus I hated Nevada's defense tonight. It was a layup and dunk drill for Iowa st.

Prohm was much more interesting to me. I liked what I saw from ISU and my only concern with him is recruiting

Also, mentioned earlier but got no response

The guy at the center of the Cal scandal with Cuonzo, was dismissed and landed with Musselman.

Would not seem great on UI staff after Whitman had to deal with things...

http://www.espn.com/mens-college-ba...ed-assistant-coach-nevada-men-basketball-team
 
Last edited:
#3,467      
https://mobile.twitter.com/SamTSnelling/status/842084771601776642

I haven't read everything page but if this hasn't been mentioned I think it's interesting because it's from a guy who covers Mizzou.

He's also got several tweets about Jamal Walker and Jeremiah Tilmon.

Would be pretty triggered if Walker and Tilmon end up at Mizzou, have hated that school ever since that stretch around the Rose Bowl year where we kept playing them the first game of the season.
 
#3,468      

matt1all

Chicago, IL
I'm like 10 pages behind, but would people seriously be upset with Bryce Drew? Am i living on another planet?

After the near impossible trio of Archie, Bennett , Marshall. Bryce and Keatts would be my next choices.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#3,469      

BananaShampoo

Captain 'Paign
Phoenix, AZ
In comparison to Monty Williams, whom everyone here seemingly would love to have, I don't see much of a difference based on their NBA coaching records. Mitchell had .433 winning percentage while Williams had a .439 percentage in only 33 fewer games coached. I'm not advocating for Mitchell, but I don't see how'd be any worse than Monty.
People also forget that coaches like Kruger, Calipari, etc all all had less than impressive NBA stints. It's just a totally different ballgame.
 
#3,470      

BananaShampoo

Captain 'Paign
Phoenix, AZ
I feel like Prohm is the underrated candidate here. I'd be thrilled to get him, Drew, or Keatts if not one of the Big 3. No for me on Musselman just because he seems totally west coast and jumps around way too much for my liking.
 
#3,471      

matt1all

Chicago, IL
Also I'm not sure if all Drews are necessarily created equal, at least for this job at the U of I. Scott makes me nervous in all kinds of ways. I don't think it'd be a bad hire, but personally, I'd call Bryce first.

I don't necessarily want to, but if I need to start the Bryce Boat in parallel with S&C's Keatts Train, I'll do it. Don't make me

giphy.gif



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
#3,472      

chrisRunner7

Spokane, WA
The only things that have changed since Whitman's press conference are:
1) Martin to Mizzou
2) Indiana job opening

That's it. Literally everything else is message board nonsense. Whitman may have had his guy since the press conference - waiting for said guy's season to end. Or maybe not.

I'm loving all the reading here - but we have learned nothing. Nothing has changed.

The sky isn't falling, despite some people freaking out because everyone's favorite fall-back option Cuonzo Martin went to Missouri. I would also add:

3) Keatts is done with his season now, so another program (i.e., NC State) might snatch him up if we wait *too* long for a bigger hire
4) Gregg Marshall tells the media he's very happy at WSU but will listen to offers... I think that was common knowledge but it was still nice to read
5) Archie says he's just focusing on the tournament right now, which I interpreted to mean he'll also listen to offers

Anyone find a way to watch games on replay? I'm gonna be at work during the Dayton-Wichita St game and it looks like CBS is being a tool and not providing a replay option like WatchESPN provides. Maybe I'm just being obtuse and missing it in the app. Don't have DVR.
 
#3,473      
The discussion on Kendall Gill's mentioning of Sam Mitchell's interest in the job was fairly brief. Why is this board so opposed to Mitchell?

Because there is a large handful of more qualified candidates?
 
#3,474      
Have a bet with a couple of IU fans. Have to give 3 names for UI job and 3 names for IU job over the weekend. Who would be in your top three most likely for each job?

My thought so far UI-BDrew, Keats, Capel. IU-Marshal, Alford, ?.

Any suggestions?

According to the statement they (the IU AD?) made, their expectation is the next Coach K.
 
#3,475      
I'm like 10 pages behind, but would people seriously be upset with Bryce Drew? Am i living on another planet?

After the near impossible trio of Archie, Bennett , Marshall. Bryce and Keatts would be my next choices.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bryce was last years Keatts. I think he would do a very good job at Illinois.
Whitman is going to hire a guy he has full confidence in, whether it be Drew, Keatts, Marshall, etc. or my favorite, Bennett.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.