TSJ Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#526      

illini0440

illini0440
illini0440
blackdog said:
The only thing I'm a little iffy on is the optics of JW saying in the presser that they don't do they arent investigators but then using their own information for the panel. Not saying that they shouldn't do it but it might look a little questionable after he said that.
Click to expand...
Josh wasn’t going to lead on to what they know in a press conference. Went all this is done I’ll put out a post detailing as much as I can.
 
#530      

illini011

I
illini011
Does anyone know when the committee will announce a decision on TSJ’s playing status for the time being
 
#531      

illiniballknower

I
illiniballknower
illini0440 said:
Then you haven’t….mis representation falls under rape in Kansas law
Click to expand...
The charging document clearly states he was charged under subsection 1a/b. The misrepresentation stuff is subsections 4/5 and don't apply since they deal with "sexual intercourse was a medically or therapeutically necessary procedure" and "sexual intercourse was a legally required procedure within the scope of the offender's authority".
 
#532      

IlliniKat91

IlliniKat91
Chicago, IL
IlliniKat91
DeeSunmu 11 said:
Isn't misrepresentation limited to misrepresentation of medical or law enforcement misrepresentation? Did his charge state force was used? Maybe i misread something.
Click to expand...
Some on here read it that way, but from what I read, any misrepresentation -- presenting yourself as wealthy and using that to intice your partner, for example -- could get you charged with rape if your partner found out you were actually poor and got upset. They could say you misled them, thereby meaning they couldn't consent since they didn't have all the facts
 
#533      

Thompson

T
Thompson
If TJ is reinstated Tuesday does he play that night or get back in practice and aim for Friday return?
 
#535      

HailtotheChief

H
HailtotheChief
illini0440 said:
Read the Kansas rape laws….all sexual actions were consensual
Click to expand...
Well, I believe that is the case. However, the courts issued a warrant so now that's up to them to decide. Has a university ever allowed a player to play in games on a rape charge while released on bail? Like I said I think he is innocent like you do but until its cleared up. History and logic says with a "zero tolerance policy" as long as the courts say otherwise I can't see him playing. Do you really think he will when out on bond 0440? I dont.
 
#538      

LJ22

L
Chicago, IL
LJ22
IlliniKat91 said:
Some on here read it that way, but from what I read, any misrepresentation -- presenting yourself as wealthy and using that to intice your partner, for example -- could get you charged with rape if your partner found out you were actually poor and got upset. They could say you misled them, thereby meaning they couldn't consent since they didn't have all the facts
Click to expand...
I don't think that is the case, from my reading. I think misrepresentation has to do with the act, not with who commits the act.
 
#539      

illini011

I
illini011
I don’t know if this means anything but interesting…
IMG_9506.jpeg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.