TSJ Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#102      
Take this for what it’s worth. My connections on the WBB side have told me(my wife) the following:

It’s unlikely, but possible that TJ comes back prior to a full resolution of the case. The panel is independent, but “friendly” to the DIA.
It's for sure possible. Still looking at and gathering evidence. Again, just a reminder, the panel does not have to make a decision right away
 
#104      
Looking ahead IF Shannon is reinstated. Can you imagine what student sections are going to do to him at away games? Even if the charges are dismissed, he's going to have to deal with a lot of s**t from that corner of the gym.
Deon Thomas was similarly (mis)treated. For four long years. Never heard a peep from the host schools' administrations about their badly behaved students. Especially the racist taunts in Evanston.
 
#107      
I hope this episode influences AD sponsored player training when they get into our program. The reality is that this was not a wise decision by player to get in this situation. That said, I would expect university player sex harassment training will get a good review...and I have confidence in JW and BU to apply lessons learned here.

We live in a very litigious society ... all it takes is a " he said ...she said" scenario to cut a college athletic career short.

I hope Shannon is cleared ultimately, but I don't see a scenario where he is on a court with Illini uniform again.
 
#109      
I hope this episode influences AD sponsored player training when they get into our program. The reality is that this was not a wise decision by player to get in this situation. That said, I would expect university player sex harassment training will get a good review...and I have confidence in JW and BU to apply lessons learned here.

We live in a very litigious society ... all it takes is a " he said ...she said" scenario to cut a college athletic career short.

I hope Shannon is cleared ultimately, but I don't see a scenario where he is on a court with Illini uniform again.
I believe we have this.
 
#110      

skyIdub

Winged Warrior
I made cottage cheese today. It's easier than you might think.
anigif_enhanced-17904-1469037246-2.gif
 
#112      
It's for sure possible. Still looking at and gathering evidence. Again, just a reminder, the panel does not have to make a decision right away
The scenario that keeps running through my mind is as follows: The powers that be are confident that TSJ is innocent. Had this occurred in C-U, someone could get information from the authorities as to whether the allegations have any merit. Here, it doesn't seem like Lawrence/Douglas County is giving out any information. While the panel might be strongly convinced of his innocence after hearing TSJ's side, they might be unwilling to halt the suspension on such a high-profile case involving a rape charge purely based on the word of TSJ and his friends, regardless of how persuasive their case is.

I don't know that there's anything stopping Douglas County, Kansas from keeping the case active for six months, waiting for some evidentiary lightning bolt to strike, reamining silent on the details and then quietly dropping the case in July or whenever if nothing happens. Meanwhile, the UI panel is gun-shy about taking action for fear (unfounded as it might be) that they'll get blind-sided by some secret evidence the day after they lift the suspension.
 
#113      

Captain 14

The Last Best Place
That's 2 hours too long. Honestly, if people want to debate law, open up a new thread entitled "Kansas State Law". It's getting outside of the TSJ discussion and dovetailing into a pi$$ing contest of who knows more.

Let's go with the 0040 and our other insiders who bring legitimate value as to where everything sits.
So many lawyers. So little time.
 
#114      
No amount of training is going to stop young men (especially famous ones, because of the relative ease) from pursuing casual relationships with the opposite sex.
Agreed young casual relationships are tough to stop

But on the player training, just think if you clearly relay a "you may lose your college sports career, even if you think you are innocent...." and present scenarios like we are discussing, players may wake up.. and players in bars need to protect each other from a bad outcome.

In corporate training I have had....accuser is always assumed right until proven otherwise....alot of hearings if its ever overturned.
 
#115      
First time poster with a few questions for everyone. What are the spillover effects and unintended consequences from a trial that will attract attention both nationally and in the Chicago area? Will parents of high school boys hesitate to send their sons to a campus ruled by this DA? FYI, 40% of students at KU come from out-of-state, led by Illinois at 7.08%. Will other universities and colleges make Lawrence, Kansas a "no-go zone" for their men's athletic teams? What happens to the future of bars, restaurants, and any other gathering establishments in Lawrence? How do they react/over-react to this situation?
Maybe I'm reading your statistics incorrectly, but over 12,000 of the total 56,000 enrolled at the University this fall are international students which is about 22%, not 7%. Or maybe you were only counting from other U.S. states.
 
#116      
I hope this episode influences AD sponsored player training when they get into our program. The reality is that this was not a wise decision by player to get in this situation. That said, I would expect university player sex harassment training will get a good review...and I have confidence in JW and BU to apply lessons learned here.

We live in a very litigious society ... all it takes is a " he said ...she said" scenario to cut a college athletic career short.

I hope Shannon is cleared ultimately, but I don't see a scenario where he is on a court with Illini uniform again.
It may not be the most likely outcome, but multiple insiders have already told us that there are scenarios where he plays again. I’ll give you one scenario. She recants and the charges are dropped.
 
#117      
The scenario that keeps running through my mind is as follows: The powers that be are confident that TSJ is innocent. Had this occurred in C-U, someone could get information from the authorities as to whether the allegations have any merit. Here, it doesn't seem like Lawrence/Douglas County is giving out any information. While the panel might be strongly convinced of his innocence after hearing TSJ's side, they might be unwilling to halt the suspension on such a high-profile case involving a rape charge purely based on the word of TSJ and his friends, regardless of how persuasive their case is.

I don't know that there's anything stopping Douglas County, Kansas from keeping the case active for six months, waiting for some evidentiary lightning bolt to strike, reamining silent on the details and then quietly dropping the case in July or whenever if nothing happens. Meanwhile, the UI panel is gun-shy about taking action for fear (unfounded as it might be) that they'll get blind-sided by some secret evidence the day after they lift the suspension.
Someone said yesterday that Illinois has sent someone that has investigated the charges in Lawrence. Some ex- FBI person that does vetting for the university on other things. No idea if that's true. From all the discussion here it sounds like they may be operating on a lot more than just what TSJ said.
 
#118      

Mr. Tibbs

southeast DuPage
Our AD is very professional and sharp, I'm sure he and University leadership had a high bar to allow TSJ to play in October/November. Is it likely they saw air tight proof of innocence?
no such thing
there is just simply degrees of not guilty
 
#119      
Occasionally there is a post in these threads that I find educational. In that spirit, other than justice served is the accuser typically awarded any damages if the defendant is found guilty of the felony or the misdemeanor charge?
 
#120      
Occasionally there is a post in these threads that I find educational. In that spirit, other than justice served is the accuser typically awarded any damages if the defendant is found guilty of the felony or the misdemeanor charge?
That would be done in a civil trial after the criminal case has run its course. One which I’m sure is being prepared as we speak.
 
#121      

Ransom Stoddard

Ordained Dudeist Priest
Bloomington, IL
Occasionally there is a post in these threads that I find educational. In that spirit, other than justice served is the accuser typically awarded any damages if the defendant is found guilty of the felony or the misdemeanor charge?
The accuser can file civil charges for damages.
 
#122      
no such thing
there is just simply degrees of not guilty

That’s not true. There can most certainly be proof of innocence outside the courtroom. Inside the courtroom, you are correct… there are only degrees of not guilty. “Guilty/Not Guily” only applies in the courtroom. Jaylon Tate had proof of his innocence (time stamped credit card receipts) and was able to prove his innocence and the charges were dropped, thereby never making it to a courtroom.
 
#123      
I was wondering how this news would affect the weekly rankings and found this article (link below) from CBS Sports. This one paragraph stood out to me:

"Right now, we still have more questions than answers, and I'm not interested in speculating much about how things might unfold. But one thing worth remembering in this era of college athletics -- and something I pointed out on Thursday's episode of the Eye On College Basketball podcast -- is that players rarely return after being charged with rape. It's one thing to be accused of a crime like this — but actually being charged is a whole different deal, one that's typically difficult to recover from, broadly speaking, now that universities all of the country have changed policies connected to how they deal with athletes who are charged with sexual assault."

Of course, that's just one writer's opinion, but seems pretty valid to me. Unless all charges are dropped quickly, I don't see how TSJ plays college basketball again. I hope something can be settled soon for all parties involved and TSJ gets back on the court as this team can be very, very good. And is to this point.

https://www.cbssports.com/college-b...-suspension-of-star-wing-terrence-shannon-jr/
 
Last edited:
#124      
I am an attorney and I’m very much presenting facts. The term in Kansas is called “rape by fraud”. Numerous scenarios have been prosecuted.

The cases that I am familiar with the misrepresentation was more material than what appears to be in this case but still the argument is essentially “rape by fraud” or “rape by a misrepresentation”. And if you don’t think that is a real thing then there are people in prison in Kansas who disagree with you.
Based on your background then, how broad exactly does misrepresentation cover? If an amateur activity like college athlete of a specific sport would be covered, then I'd have to think almost anything could be covered. Are we talking mistaking a job title? lying about your hobbies or likes? Not disclosing you dye your hair or wear colored contacts, or that you wear lifts? Or that you're totally over your ex that you caught cheating on you with your best friend less than 24 hours ago? How far exactly does it go? Are you required by Kansas law to be 100% honest about everything or run the risk of legal action for rape if one of those lies or mistruths is what they say attracted them to you enough to have a sexual relationship?

I mean at some point, you go broad enough and most everyone misrepresents themselves in some ways. Where exactly is the line in Kansas or is that something that still is being played out in the courtroom?
 
#125      
Based on your background then, how broad exactly does misrepresentation cover? If an amateur activity like college athlete of a specific sport would be covered, then I'd have to think almost anything could be covered. Are we talking mistaking a job title? lying about your hobbies or likes? Not disclosing you dye your hair or wear colored contacts, or that you wear lifts? Or that you're totally over your ex that you caught cheating on you with your best friend less than 24 hours ago? How far exactly does it go? Are you required by Kansas law to be 100% honest about everything or run the risk of legal action for rape if one of those lies or mistruths is what they say attracted them to you enough to have a sexual relationship?

I mean at some point, you go broad enough and most everyone misrepresents themselves in some ways. Where exactly is the line in Kansas or is that something that still is being played out in the courtroom?
Elephant in the room...what has more material and prestige value 1) Random football player on a non-bowl team or 2) basketball player on top 15 team who is on the All-American list?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.