And what a response it is. Yikes.Here's the U of I's response
Not seeing much shame in following what a federal judge says you should doGary Parrish just laid some national media tracks for shaming BU if he plays Shannon in the case that a TRO is granted and the case is still pending.
geezGary Parrish just laid some national media tracks for shaming BU if he plays Shannon in the case that a TRO is granted and the case is still pending.
The GA one basically says he learned of TJ and Harmon trip to KU for football game that afternoon. Had concerns of them driving there because long drive (12 hours to/from) and TJ had fallen asleep at wheel before + he had the NIL obligation next day. So he asked Dyshawn to drive them. Basically it.If anyone could summarize specifically what the docs re: GA and JW say I will give you my beach house.
because he posted about it on an internet message board and that makes it official. /sHow do you know the TRO will be denied?
The GA one basically says he learned of TJ and Harmon trip to KU for football game that afternoon. Had concerns of them driving there because long drive (12 hours to/from) and TJ had fallen asleep at wheel before + he had the NIL obligation next day. So he asked Dyshawn to drive them. Basically it.
And no IANAL
JWs reiterates a lot of the stuff in the presser (timeline, process they follow etc) - couple key takeaways I had (on a quick read) were:
1. Dyshawn Hobson is only a student manager and an hourly employee, not a formal grad assistant. What he did with TJ and Harmon was not in any "official capacity" for DIA/UI nor did he put in an expense report or ask to reimbursed for the trip.
2. "The Panel is not an investigative or fact-finding body. It is not asked to determine, or even opine on, whether the alleged misconduct did, in fact, occur". I think some people are saying how could the panel look at the evidence and not reinstate him... that is not their role as designed
3. "I have reviewed DIA records, which demonstrate that it is not a foregone conclusion that the Panel will uphold the suspension following an interim action. Since first introducing the Policy for the 2017-18 academic year, on nine different occasions DIA has initiated the interim action process based on allegations of a Major Offense. In two instances, including at least one involving allegations of sexual misconduct, the Panel has decided to reinstate the involved student athlete."
Dyshawn is a GA.The GA one basically says he learned of TJ and Harmon trip to KU for football game that afternoon. Had concerns of them driving there because long drive (12 hours to/from) and TJ had fallen asleep at wheel before + he had the NIL obligation next day. So he asked Dyshawn to drive them. Basically it.
And no IANAL
JWs reiterates a lot of the stuff in the presser (timeline, process they follow etc) - couple key takeaways I had (on a quick read) were:
1. Dyshawn Hobson is only a student manager and an hourly employee, not a formal grad assistant. What he did with TJ and Harmon was not in any "official capacity" for DIA/UI nor did he put in an expense report or ask to reimbursed for the trip.
2. "The Panel is not an investigative or fact-finding body. It is not asked to determine, or even opine on, whether the alleged misconduct did, in fact, occur". I think some people are saying how could the panel look at the evidence and not reinstate him... that is not their role as designed
3. "I have reviewed DIA records, which demonstrate that it is not a foregone conclusion that the Panel will uphold the suspension following an interim action. Since first introducing the Policy for the 2017-18 academic year, on nine different occasions DIA has initiated the interim action process based on allegations of a Major Offense. In two instances, including at least one involving allegations of sexual misconduct, the Panel has decided to reinstate the involved student athlete."
Hello,Not sure anyone knows what is going to happen today other than the judge. With that being said, this is not a make or break either way. Still a lot to play out with a case in the coming weeks along with the possible preliminary hearing
no. this is the hearing that would happen in 10ish days if the judge grants it. this would be the big one, the permanent one where he would likely be with the team the rest of the year. Both sides would have evidence to present and then go from thereHello,
But doesn’t this mean Terrance is out until March?
Parrish is an especially outstanding clown amongst a group full of outstanding clowns.geez
it’s basketball career suicide if BU doesn’t play him .
these national talking heads lump all these situations together , and automatically assume players are guilty until proven otherwise .
It's hard to take people seriously when they speak in absolutes about the unknowable.The TRO will be denied. The injunction in a few weeks is then more important decision, but the TRO decision today will be at least somewhat telling as to how the judge perceives TJ’s case.
Main path forward to return to action remains a dropping of charges
Five second google search:I’m not attacking you, Chad…but:
1. Did ol’ Gair publicly shame Nate Oats and Alabama when Brandon Miller played all season after being arrested? It is comparable in a several ways. If he did…I’ll give him credit for at least being consistent
2. I’m not sure it’s in G. Parrish’s power to shame Brad Underwood.View attachment 30139
It's hard to take people seriously when they speak in absolutes about the unknowable.
II. The Court Should Deny Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction in its Entirety.
Certainly doesn't read like a university trying to cut a deal with the player.
Have you seen any actual evidence that he is guilty though? Genuinely askingGonna be honest guys, shaming by the media is not what we need to worry about if Shannon plays with a felony rape trial looming. This is an extremely dangerous situation for the university and frankly college athletics. If players are able to TRO on their own university for sitting them while actually have charges of felonies precedents are being set. Let alone if he is found guilty. Underwood could be a victim of all this. I am extremely nervous for the outcome of this and I have not seen anywhere actual evidence that TSJ is not guilty. Caution, caution, caution....He is also my favorite player on the team and I want him to be innocent and have a long NBA career, as a program that is the best outcome. The risk of playing a person that is ultimately found guilty of any level of sexual assault just to get some wins is too much for me.
Hate to disagree with JW who is smarter than I am bit # 2 is simply not accurate. Their finding was there is credible evidence of a serious crime. Not opine on? No they did not give an opinion they gave a finding. A finding that is necessary to suspend him. If # 2 is truly how they operate that is nothing more than a rubber stamp which is not due process in any world I operate inThe GA one basically says he learned of TJ and Harmon trip to KU for football game that afternoon. Had concerns of them driving there because long drive (12 hours to/from) and TJ had fallen asleep at wheel before + he had the NIL obligation next day. So he asked Dyshawn to drive them. Basically it.
And no IANAL
JWs reiterates a lot of the stuff in the presser (timeline, process they follow etc) - couple key takeaways I had (on a quick read) were:
1. Dyshawn Hobson is only a student manager and an hourly employee, not a formal grad assistant. What he did with TJ and Harmon was not in any "official capacity" for DIA/UI nor did he put in an expense report or ask to reimbursed for the trip.
2. "The Panel is not an investigative or fact-finding body. It is not asked to determine, or even opine on, whether the alleged misconduct did, in fact, occur". I think some people are saying how could the panel look at the evidence and not reinstate him... that is not their role as designed
3. "I have reviewed DIA records, which demonstrate that it is not a foregone conclusion that the Panel will uphold the suspension following an interim action. Since first introducing the Policy for the 2017-18 academic year, on nine different occasions DIA has initiated the interim action process based on allegations of a Major Offense. In two instances, including at least one involving allegations of sexual misconduct, the Panel has decided to reinstate the involved student athlete."
He actually did repeatedly say last year that even if Brandon Miller didn't actually break any laws according to the police, it was still crazy that there were no repercussions on the team. He said that if your team rules don't forbid taking a gun to someone that then uses it to murder someone else, then you should rethink your team rules.I’m not attacking you, Chad…but:
1. Did ol’ Gair publicly shame Nate Oats and Alabama when Brandon Miller played all season after being arrested? It is comparable in a several ways. If he did…I’ll give him credit for at least being consistent
2. I’m not sure it’s in G. Parrish’s power to shame Brad Underwood.View attachment 30139