USC, UCLA to join the Big Ten in 2024

Status
Not open for further replies.
#101      
10-years ago, Texas and OU almost went to the PAC-12 and we were writing obituaries for the Big 12.

How things change.
 
#102      

Ransom Stoddard

Ordained Dudeist Priest
Bloomington, IL
10-years ago, Texas and OU almost went to the PAC-12 and we were writing obituaries for the Big 12.

How things change.
The Big 12 is still the most likely casualty in all this IMO. Right now I'd guess that the Pac goes after some B12 schools to try to stay afloat.
 
#104      
10-years ago, Texas and OU almost went to the PAC-12 and we were writing obituaries for the Big 12.

How things change.
Still writing obituaries for the Big 12 though

Sesame Street Idk GIF
 
#107      
How large is this conference going to get? You can’t play a balanced schedule. Not a fan of this.
 
#108      
The Big 12 is still the most likely casualty in all this IMO. Right now I'd guess that the Pac goes after some B12 schools to try to stay afloat.
I'd be pretty surprised if they didn't work hard to nab one of the Big 12's remaining Texas schools. Also, was wondering if BYU may be looking for ab out before it even officially joins.
 
#110      

dgcrow

Kelso, WA
Here is what I wrote on August 18, 2021 in post 741 in conference realignment.

ere is my "dream" scenario:

Have the following schools from the PAC 12:

West Division (all AAU schools):

USC
UCLA
Stanford
California
Oregon
Washington
Utah
Arizona

The Central Division is:

Illinois
Northwestern
Iowa
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Nebraska
Kansas
Notre Dame

The East Division

Michigan
Michigan St.
Ohio St.
Penn St.
Maryland
Indiana
Purdue
Pittsburgh

Atlantic Division

Duke
North Carolina
Clemson
Virginia
Georgia Tech
Virginia Tech
FSU
Rutgers

Have each division winner play a qualify for a conference playoff.

Play each team in your division and then play the corresponding same place team in the other divisions from the following year. Two non-conference games.

The Great BIG Conference
Not bad at all. If the Big 10 really does go overboard, looks like a good plan.
 
#112      

redwingillini11

White and Sixth
North Aurora
The one down side is that I was looking forward to a 3-5-5 plan that would likely end up in us play every team in the conference twice every four years. Now if we are going to approach 20 teams, unless we go to 10 conference games, its hard to see that happening.
 
#113      
We really just need to forget the 20th Century concept of conferences. Every top tier high revenue generating flagship university that hasn’t already will need to apply for and accept an invitation to join the B1G or the SEC ASAP. Not doing so is relegating yourself to the lower divisions permanently. It’s a pyramid system going forward, English Premier League and English Football League Championship, and League One and Two below that, except there won’t be promotions. You may like that structure or hate it but we can at least be grateful that we were essentially grandfathered in. Welcome to our new life as college football’s West Ham United.
 
#115      
As long as we're dreaming big .... New "Death Star" BIG ... not divisions, just travel pods for scheduling (all AAU members, save ND). Can you imagine the basketball schedule?

1. UCLA, USC, UO, UWASH, STAN, CAL, AZ
2. UTAH, COL, NEB, MINN, KAN, IOWA, UW
3. IND, ILL, NW, ND, OSU, UM, MSU
4. PSU, RUT, MD, UNC, DUKE, GA TECH, UVA
 
#116      
We really just need to forget the 20th Century concept of conferences. Every top tier high revenue generating flagship university that hasn’t already will need to apply for and accept an invitation to join the B1G or the SEC ASAP. Not doing so is relegating yourself to the lower divisions permanently. It’s a pyramid system going forward, English Premier League and English Football League Championship, and League One and Two below that, except there won’t be promotions. You may like that structure or hate it but we can at least be grateful that we were essentially grandfathered in. Welcome to our new life as college football’s West Ham United.
Yeah, the real question in my mind is whether either of the SEC or Big Ten can cement itself as the "Premier League" of college revenue sports or whether it'll be more like pre-interleague NL/AL in baseball, with the two mega conferences playing separate and parallel to each other, only meeting in the post season to crown a champion. If I had to guess, I'd go with the latter.
 
#117      

Mr. Tibbs

southeast DuPage
The Big 12 is still the most likely casualty in all this IMO. Right now I'd guess that the Pac goes after some B12 schools to try to stay afloat.
the dust wont settle on this for awhile. The B12 and the leftovers from the PAC will merge, and it will be a pretty good conference - we will then have 4 Power conferences .
 
#123      

dgcrow

Kelso, WA
I doubt he was the driving force behind this. TV people usually are
The real driving force, of course, as has been the case for years in college athletics, is $$$$.
 
#125      
I guess this seems to be the way that the conference realignment is going (mega-conference, adapt or die) but the purist in me really doesn't like this at all. It seems like having Rutgers, Maryland, and Penn State in the same conference as USC and UCLA makes zero sense, let alone the travel would be absolutely brutal (think I saw someone mention the Big Ten should just buy an airline). Shoot, let's just grab Oregon too and really make traveling a cluster.
Let go of Rutgers and Maryland and give me Missouri and Pitt instead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.