I think we could be the worst 6th seed. Beat USC or OSU, then an upper 6th seed. Get to the semi's, then a 5th seed, imo.We are now top 15 in NET.
I think we could be the worst 6th seed. Beat USC or OSU, then an upper 6th seed. Get to the semi's, then a 5th seed, imo.We are now top 15 in NET.
I misunderstood your point - I also thought you were saying WI as a 4 seed isn’t Entitled to that, you’re saying as a 5 seed that’s BS for them to get Milwaukee and a home game over a 4 seed Arizona for example. My bad!Nothing to do with "conference" affiliation really. Venues are absolutely a consideration.
The Selection Committee would face incredible scrutiny if they awarded so called home games to any of the mid or bottom-seeded teams in any conference. Further examples ------ Big Ten coaches would blow up if lowly Ohio State were allowed to play its first two games in Columbus, or if lowly Indiana played its first two games in Indianapolis.
Theoretically, so long as Wisconsin is a 4 seed or better on selection Sunday, Milwaukee is an option for them regardless of where the finish in the B10. For example, MSU and Michigan probably wouldn't care less if Wisconsin got Milwaukee if they both got Cleveland. Milwaukee though would obviously be Wisconsin's top choice.Unless Wisconsin wins the BTT............................
No way that the 4th/5th best team in the Big 10 gets to play the first two rounds of the NCAA tourney that close to home. That would be an advantage that multiple teams above them in the B10 standings will NOT have.
Easy call.
With the similar resume heading into btt. I say Illini’s and Wisconsin are seeded 4-7Wisconsin was projected as a 2/3 seed earlier this week. With the loss against PSU and losing 3 out of the last 5 it will be interesting where they will move to
Current NET 20
6-7 quad 1
9-1 quad 2
What would you seed them now?
We have more quad 1 wins but they have more quad 1/2 wins 15 to our 14. Neither team has a quad 3/4 loss
If Wisconsin loses their first round BTT game and we win two games, ANY way that gets us to Milwaukee? Man......that would be ideal.
Where is Drake projected? Probably in the 11-12 range regardless of what happens today.
Dangerous team.
Add the drama factor. Magically moving a team up or down a spot if that would likely boost ratings.That’s not at all how it works lol there is no conference affiliation beyond the autobid…it’s just resumes agnostic of conference with a few sprinkles of when you can face another conference team.
That Stirtz kid seems like someone to watch as a transfer. 19 per game 5.8 assists 4.4 rebounds and 37% from 3Where is Drake projected? Probably in the 11-12 range regardless of what happens today.
Dangerous team.
We did (I hope) break the spell that Purdue has over us. It would be nice to do the same to the Maryland spell.This ‘I don’t want to play/want no part of Maryland’ nonsense is just that, nonsense. Seen this a few times and it’s irritating. I don’t care who we play we are a good team and can beat anyone in this league. Maryland is not some juggernaut or elite team. They can be beat and we can beat them. I know the actual team feels that way.
Really, they should make it a rule that nobody gets home games in the first two rounds. That's not a perk that's available to all. To be fair, it shouldn't be available to any (even us.)My question with them is have they "earned" their first two games in Milwaukee? That will be a HUGE decision by the committee. That's two home games. Not sure their finish should award them that advantage. Forget their number.
Really, they should make it a rule that nobody gets home games in the first two rounds. That's not a perk that's available to all. To be fair, it shouldn't be available to any (even us.)
They literally TRY to give home games to protected seeds, though, and I like it. When you have an elite season, you get rewarded with paths like our 2005 path through Indy and Chicago!Really, they should make it a rule that nobody gets home games in the first two rounds. That's not a perk that's available to all. To be fair, it shouldn't be available to any (even us.)
Released 24 minutes ago... six seed:Hasn't updated yet, we should be up at least 2 or 3 soon. 3/4 of the major outlets had us as a 6 today
My question is: if we win one game in big ten tournament, can we be a six seed?Released 24 minutes ago... six seed:
![]()
Men's Bracketology: How the projected NCAA tournament field is taking shape
The selection show is almost here! Here's the latest look at what we're expecting when it starts.www.espn.com
Considering this predicts we already are a 6 seed... yes. The question is what takes us to a 5, one win or two.My question is: if we win one in BTT, can we be a six seed?
To say this in the best way I can - I'm afraid we're way too optimistic about this. One win in BTT against a non-tourney team like OSU or Iowa gets us to a 5?? Not to just dwell on one conference because after all this is 7-8 teams at most, but there is a logjam of SEC teams with way tougher schedules than us, better quality wins, and less losses. Look at Kentucky for example: they have wins @Mizzou, Florida, and @Tennessee, Duke, on and on. Mizzou has won @Florida and beat Alabama. Ole Miss just beat Tennessee and has big wins.Considering this predicts we already are a 6 seed... yes. The question is what takes us to a 5, one win or two.
Dependent on how other teams perform, I would have to think a trip to the semis will be strong consideration for a 5 seed.Considering this predicts we already are a 6 seed... yes. The question is what takes us to a 5, one win or two.
I didn't say one would do it. I asked whether it would or whether it would take two. OSU would be Q1, though, so it's not as farfetched as you suggest.To say this in the best way I can - I'm afraid we're way too optimistic about this. One win in BTT against a non-tourney team like OSU or Iowa gets us to a 5?? There is a logjam of SEC teams with way tougher schedules than us, better quality wins, and less losses. Look at Kentucky for example: they have wins over Mizzou, Florida, and Tennessee.
I hope ur right, if we can end up at a 6 I'm more than happy. Plus, I'd argue the six might be better than the 4/5.
Regardless of all of this, if we're cemented being off the 8/9 (even with a loss), that's still a lot to be proud of.