Wisconsin 91, Illinois 88 OT Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#1,177      
Just a genuine question - If Brad is as good of a coach as so many on here think he is …

How come every time there’s a big opening he’s never mentioned ?

Especially before the newest extension …

This isn’t true.
 
#1,178      
Exactly right. No coach can be great at everything. We all have strengths and weaknesses.

Brad is really, really good at culture and talent evaluation. He’s not a good X-O coach like Kruger was. Hire someone to shore up those weaknesses. It shouldn’t be that hard.
I agree completely with statement one, above. No coach, alone, possesses everything needed for coaching excellence. A coach needs to supplement with specific strengths of assistants.

I also agree that Brad (and staff) are outstanding at talent eval. Not pefect, but nonetheless outstanding. Good as it gets outstanding. No criticism of that, at all.

I am less sure, today, that Brad is "really, really good at culture." There is a lot of evidence that he is great at the culture element: his players praise him, year after year after year. The guys he's sent to pro basketball (NBA, Europe, wherever) praise him and flock to Champaign when the opportunity arises. This is fantastic. The culture he has built is strong.

But ... why do Illini teams so often in Underwood's tenure tip-off games with a lack of focus, a lack of fire, a lack of committment? Sure, all teams, as in every last team in sports, has serious headscratching downs to match their greatest games. I get that, it's human nature. Immutable.

But ... that's not the whole story, is it? A major part of the story, yes. But ... the whole story? No.

For reasons I can't fathom, Underwood has struggled for years now to get his message of toughness and playing with heart and poise across. I am not saying he fails at this, because he doesn't fail at this. I am saying he struggles to fully get his self-chosen players to "give a sh*t" about rebounds, turnovers, freethrows, defending screens. His words.
 
#1,179      
I think you have to look at Brad's extension. No conversations will be had on either end. He's got a lifetime contract. Move on to what could happen(and I think should).....the Euro experiment needs to be toned down a LOT. It's great to have the skill, but the lack of having some true athletes is frustrating. That is a discussion that has to happen. Not sure if it's a lack of sufficient NIL money issue?
I believe there are still plenty of US players who fit the bill.
 
#1,180      
Okay? But they were all ahead of Illinois on the list. Look back at my post, we were NINTH.

We only need to be top 10, since this was the comment everyone was crucifying:

Here’s the rest of the list after Illinois:

1. Houston: 86.6%
2. Duke: 79.7%
3. Arizona: 78.4%
4. UCONN: 78.3%
5. Purdue: 76.4%
6. Alabama: 72.7%
7. Tennessee: 72.7%
8. Kansas: 72.5%
9. Illinois: 70.3%
….
10. UCLA: 69.3%
11. North Carolina: 69.1%
12. Baylor: 69.0%
13. Auburn: 68.7%
14. Virginia: 68.2%
15. Florida: 68.2%

Take this however you’d wish. All of the teams after us:

have had at least one TRAINWRECK season in that 7-year timespan (so much so that some have even fired their coach).

but yes, have made a F4 (other than Virginia). I’m certainly not blaming folks for craving more March success. It’s just there’s a logical limit.

I, personally, would much rather hang my hat on consistency. If you keep knocking on the door with high seeds — year after year — it’s more significantly more likely than not your time will come.
He said top 10 coach.

In that case, you need to include Mark Few and Gonzaga over Brad. That’s a very respectable program that’s almost always in the sweet sixteen.

Golden and Drew also need to be above Brad as they’ve won national titles.
 
#1,182      
That article is from National Media Tycoon....

Peoria Journal Star.

In the article, it also says Underwood is a step down from the elite 12 options they name... Lloyd, Drew, among others..
Also a step down on that list were Nate Oats and the guy who ended up getting the job lol.
So a local media outlet trying to sell copies couldn't even say the instate coach was a realistic option for Kentucky....
You do realize the Peoria Journal Star article was quoting two different USA Today articles and UK sports blog, right?
 
#1,184      
That article is from National Media Tycoon....

Peoria Journal Star.

In the article, it also says Underwood is a step down from the elite 12 options they name... Lloyd, Drew, among others...

So a local media outlet trying to sell copies couldn't even say the instate coach was a realistic option for Kentucky....
Brad. Cannot. Leave. For. Another. Job.

He can't. It's built into his extension.

Feel free the copy/paste my post in any email you send. Squash it.
 
#1,186      
Also a step down on that list were Nate Oats and the guy who ended up getting the job lol.

You do realize the Peoria Journal Star article was quoting two different USA Today articles and UK sports blog, right?

You would think Kentucky ending up with mark pope, lville ending up with Pat Kelsey, and ohio state ending up with Diebler would be a lesson for everyone who thinks Illinois can just dial up whatever name they want.

Yet here we are. As always
 
#1,187      
The offseason moves havent translated to much in the way of wins? Illinois already has more wins than last year with more games yet to play… so far this year is better than last year in every way (while playing a tougher schedule)
Was talking about defense. We are better, but it still is the main reason for most (could be argued all) or our losses to date.
 
#1,188      
Chris Beard really struggled this year. Howevere, his team was playing well in the SEC tournament.
1 second weekend in 7 years.

Missed tournament 2/3 years at Ole Miss.

In his three years at Ole Miss has finished 10th, 6th, and 14th in the conference.

There's an element of randomness in single elimination tournaments. Sometimes bad teams get a little hot and go on a run, even with bad coaches. Kevin Keatts, who nobody thinks was a good coach, managed to get a team that he coached to a 10th place ACC finish (and an 11-seed) to the Final Four. He went 12-19 the following year and was fired.
 
Last edited:
#1,189      
I am sitting here trying to wade through all of this with Dick Vitale yelling in the background. I am grateful that he is healthy enough to do something he obviously loves.
 
#1,190      
Also a step down on that list were Nate Oats and the guy who ended up getting the job lol.

You do realize the Peoria Journal Star article was quoting two different USA Today articles and UK sports blog, right?
So the people they quoted as a source were soo incredibly wrong that they didn't have Pope in the top 12....

Peoria Journal Star ran the article because they could squeeze Brad and UK coaching search into the same article and sell copies. That's okay. Unless we are including Top 15/20 options... he was never on the short list.

The poster who made the comment clearly has agent ties...if he isn't one himself based on the context of things he posts.

We can disagree with his opinions but the amount of early coaching carousel news and transfer portal entries throughout the entire sport? That's unlikely to be strictly Illinois insider stuff. If Indy says he's not on the shortlist, think he knows better than most IMO.
 
#1,191      
There is no way we are firing a coach who just went 15-5 in conference and has gone to 6 straight NCAA's (would have been 7 but for Covid). He is what he is - he's a good recruiter and knows how to find talent. He can use that talent to consistently finish in the top 3rd of the Big 10 and make the tourney every year. But he is below average when it comes to actual coaching - developing game plans and managing the game. And that limits our ceiling; a great year gets us to the Elite 8 and a normal year has us going out in the Round of 32. He is Lou Henson with better hair
Lou had a F4 not sure Brad will ever get that or he has better hair at this point of his life. Brad is looking pretty thin up top these days.
 
#1,192      
Brad. Cannot. Leave. For. Another. Job.

He can't. It's built into his extension.

Feel free the copy/paste my post in any email you send. Squash it.
I don't think he leaves and I'm okay with winning 20 games a year until he hangs it up.


But also....

John Calipari had a lifetime contract. To act like these things can't be worked around especially if both parties agree?

Do any of us think Brad's agent isn't calling different schools trying to get him a raise because of that contract??
 
#1,193      
Such an unfair thing to say. Some people wear their emotions on their sleeve. Others are reserved. Doesn’t mean they are any less passionate or hard working.
Sure, but I think it’s a pretty fair assessment that this team lacks toughness. 0-3 in OT games this year. Proof is in the pudding.

I’d love to be wrong by the way. Hopefully these dudes crush our bracket and hang some a banner.
 
#1,194      
Indy, I am so where you are on this. We get those who say “well we can go back to the Groce years” yada yada on and on.

Here is were I see it. I have been a fan since Harv Schmidt. Brad did not nor ever will have built Illinois basketball. So all he is done is get us back to what 80% of where Lou had us? Lou Henson did that and he was sort of similar to Brad in that he did not win the big one and he for sure struggled in the tournament.

Now I could just say, but yes he did get the final four with our greatest team ever (and that is not even debatable to those who only knew the 05 team). That would not be my point. Even Lou had to go at some point (even though he face Deon’s atrocity and the crap the NCAA did to him - Brad has had none of that). We went after Kruger who was a tremendous coach. Then Self who should have been our Dean Smith.

In my opinion it has gone down in coach quality ever since then. Brad is leaps and bounds better than Weber or Groce, but he is not the coach that will take what Lou did for us to the next level.

Slam away, it is what I feel as a 60+ year fan. If we want to win it all we just have to wait until he does a “Lou” and retires. Thing is Brad is not Lou and he won’t do what is right for the school. I am afraid we are stuck until the time he decides he wants to leave?
I would argue that Lou Henson took over a program which was in much worse shape than when Coach Underwood arrived on the scene. There were various reasons: the slush residue and the fact that the Chicago public league coaches were steering their players away from Champaign. That is one reason why the late Jimmy Collins was so important as an assistant coach. Furthermore, after Harv Schnitt was fired Gene Bartow was here for one year and then fled to UCLA. I have not looked it up recently, I believe Bartow was something like 8-14 in his one season. Your comments are spot on.
 
#1,195      
You would think Kentucky ending up with mark pope, lville ending up with Pat Kelsey, and ohio state ending up with Diebler would be a lesson for everyone who thinks Illinois can just dial up whatever name they want.

Yet here we are. As always
This might be the most motivating reason to be happy with BU I have had presented to me? It’s just sad, and it is just my opinion and not based on any fact or anything, I just don’t think he will ever get us “there”. No question he is not getting fired, he will retire at Illinois “pretty much” on his own terms.
 
#1,196      
Just feels like we traded all our dawgs for “skill” players… I’d trade two seed lines for some dudes who leave it all on the floor every night.

No you wouldn’t bc that means that those guys that are dawgs lose more games. You want to lose more games? I don’t.
 
#1,197      
Those 2 arent the problem. They arent taking as many. The issue is Tomi and Big Z. They are combining for about 15% from three since big ten play started. Yesterday they were right on their average. 2 for 10. They need to take half that number combined or less.
This and a problem is when our “best shooters” in an offense made to shoot 3s don’t shoot many, don’t make any, or don’t shoot any.
 
#1,198      
1 second weekend in 7 years.

Missed tournament 2/3 years at Ole Miss.

In his three years at Ole Miss has finished 10th, 6th, and 14th in the conference.

There's an element of randomness in single elimination tournaments. Sometimes bad teams get a little hot and go on a run, even with bad coaches. Kevin Keatts, who nobody thinks was a good coach, managed to get a team that he coached to a 10th place ACC finish (and an 11-seed) to the Final Four. He went 12-19 the following year and was fired.
So Beard doesn’t get the same break many on here give Underwood in his first couple of years here?

I’m definitely not saying we should hire Beard, but he is coaching in a deeper and more athletic league. He did beat us last year with one of those Ole Miss teams, and not that it’ll matter for them, they just went on an onslaught in the SEC tourney.

The guy can coach.
 
#1,199      
Was talking about defense. We are better, but it still is the main reason for most (could be argued all) or our losses to date.

You said:

Crocker sure has not moved the needle a ton defensively. We are better, but it hasn't translated to much in the way of wins.

Has the (you admit) improved defense translated to more wins? Yes it already has. And we still have more games to play yet. The defense has improved from the 40 range to the 20 range so it’s just odd to me to include Crocker in the list of complaints.
 
#1,200      
Just feels like we traded all our dawgs for “skill” players… I’d trade two seed lines for some dudes who leave it all on the floor every night.
You mean what used to be called “Every Day Guys?” Where can we get some of those guys?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back