Go Back   Fighting Illini Forums > Sports > Fighting Illini Basketball

Illinois 79, Lewis 47 POSTGAME

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 27, 2012, 07:51 PM   #1
Dan
Admin
Dan's Avatar
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 25,890


Stats: http://www.fightingillini.com/livest...kbl/index.html
Gametracker: http://www.fightingillini.com/gametr...ll&from=gtLite
Dan is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 07:54 PM   #2
Holdemall
Posts: 796
Nice capper by Langford (?)
Holdemall is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 07:54 PM   #3
mdonsbach
mdonsbach's Avatar
Location: Bethalto, IL
Posts: 1,257
Nice finish to the game!

__________________
Twitter
mdonsbach is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 07:55 PM   #4
AHSIllini32
Posts: 6,985
what'd the attendence look like?
AHSIllini32 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 07:56 PM   #5
WizardBill
Illini optimist
Location: Charleston, IL
Posts: 1,029
11 guys scored. I hope we play lots of people, lots of minutes.
WizardBill is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 07:57 PM   #6
Holdemall
Posts: 796
Possession estimator gives 67 for this game vs 62 against WSU last year.
Holdemall is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:00 PM   #7
illini80
Location: Forgottonia
Posts: 2,896
Quote:
Originally Posted by AHSIllini32 View Post
what'd the attendence look like?
I never saw them pan the Assembly Hall, (maybe because I was logging in most of the game), but I would guess 5k from what I could see.
illini80 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:00 PM   #8
Dan
Admin
Dan's Avatar
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 25,890


http://www.fightingillini.com/livest...kbl/index.html
Dan is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:00 PM   #9
Groundhogday
Groundhogday's Avatar
Posts: 18,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holdemall View Post
Possession estimator gives 67 for this game vs 62 against WSU last year.
I was listening on the radio, but it didn't seem like a particularly fast paced game, particularly for a preseason exhibition matchup.

__________________
ONLY ORANGE!
Groundhogday is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:01 PM   #10
Serious Late
Serious Late's Avatar
Location: Albuquerque via Chicago via Champaign via Peoria
Posts: 1,884
Uhhhhhhh, Mike LaTulip is a baller. He clearly doesn't have the size right now to play in the Big Ten, but that kid is 2 inches and 30 pounds away from being a solid contributor for anyone. He has a way more game in him than I was expecting and I was actually hoping to see him bring the ball up instead of Berardini down the stretch. I fully expect he becomes a fan favorite quickly.

__________________
One word... Consistency.
Serious Late is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:01 PM   #11
IlliniFreak7
Banned
Posts: 210
The thing I was most excited about was the closest we let this game get was 12points for only a short period of time. It killed me how we would always keep the game close in previous years and then have to work a lot harder to close the game out. I loved seeing the fact that for a large majority of the game we were ahead by 20 and kept it that way finishing on a high note.

In addition I was glad to see that players that didn't get a lot of minutes through the game made them count. If we can keep everyone up and going there will be a lot of nice surprises this year in our depth and player development.
IlliniFreak7 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:03 PM   #12
IlliniReb
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 89
This beats the hell out of football
IlliniReb is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:04 PM   #13
illini80
Location: Forgottonia
Posts: 2,896
I can't imagine Groce will be that happy with the game, but that's ok. There clearly are plenty of things to work on and that's what this will be used for.

The one thing I was looking for I didn't really see. That was someone who had made huge strides since last year. Actually, I guess I did. Henry was very active. If he can maintain the effort he will see a lot of time at the 4 and that will be a big plus.
illini80 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:06 PM   #14
Holdemall
Posts: 796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Groundhogday View Post
I was listening on the radio, but it didn't seem like a particularly fast paced game, particularly for a preseason exhibition matchup.
No, it wasn't. Part of that was the Lewis was pretty deliberate on offense. One interesting tidbit-last year against WSU, the Illini tallied 0 fast break points. This time around there were more than that, for sure.
Holdemall is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:07 PM   #15
Holdemall
Posts: 796
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serious Late View Post
Uhhhhhhh, Mike LaTulip is a baller. He clearly doesn't have the size right now to play in the Big Ten, but that kid is 2 inches and 30 pounds away from being a solid contributor for anyone. He has a way more game in him than I was expecting and I was actually hoping to see him bring the ball up instead of Berardini down the stretch. I fully expect he becomes a fan favorite quickly.
+1000. Actually attempts to contribute when he's in there, and does a nice job. Can he give us 5 good possessions a game? I think so.
Holdemall is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:10 PM   #16
Mark Seifert
Posts: 485
Quote:
Originally Posted by illini80 View Post
I can't imagine Groce will be that happy with the game, but that's ok. There clearly are plenty of things to work on and that's what this will be used for.
Yeah, plenty to work on, and that's fine. Good energy and effort throughout though, and that's really all I wanted to see at this point.
Mark Seifert is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:11 PM   #17
Illini B-Ball Fan
Illini B-Ball Fan's Avatar
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 170
Boxscore stats appear to be typical for a first game - all over the place. Glad to see as many scored as they did. Go Illini.
Illini B-Ball Fan is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:11 PM   #18
Botb9
Realist
Botb9's Avatar
Posts: 3,152
Disappointed with Egwu. All that progress he made will be for naught if he can't stay on the floor.

__________________
Hype is a self-serving beast that feeds on the hopes and dreams of fans.
Botb9 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:15 PM   #19
Dan
Admin
Dan's Avatar
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 25,890
Groce pre the radio-

* Upbeat about how they started, how hard they played.

* Like that McLaurin always plays with a motor.

* Yesterday was the first day they worked against a zone defense in practice, wasn't surprised they didn't look great tonight when Lewis went zone.

* Goal to have more assists than turnovers tonight, didn't quite get there.

* Need to work on reducing the silly fouls.

* Can't wait get the stats and get back to work in practice.
Dan is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:18 PM   #20
Illinidreamin
Location: Paris, IL.
Posts: 37
I was impressed with LaTulip as well. He has a quick release (as he should). I also thought that Henry did a great job as well. Shaw though he didn't get very many minutes was active and 4 rebounds for the amount of time he was in. All in all it was a sloppy game and i am worried about point guard play. Abrams started well but did not finish well in my opinion. Team did what they were supposed to do. As a side note, I liked that Coach talked to each player as they came off. Communicating with each one. This is something I like to see from a coach and it has been missing. I think its these moments that players learn from coaches. Groce seems to get it, putting his arms around the player and teaching.
Illinidreamin is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:21 PM   #21
Dan
Admin
Dan's Avatar
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 25,890
Quote:
Groce: Thought effort was terrific, came out swinging, guys have been coachable and teachable.

Groce: "The biggest thing I learned tonight is how good they want to be."

Myke Henry: The offense has more spacing for isolation, lot more screening

Groce wants to play 9 guys. Learning more about his players each night. Will solidify rotation in next exhibition.

http://twitter.com/WernerESPNCU
Dan is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:23 PM   #22
kingmal
Posts: 2,508
Quote:
Originally Posted by illini80 View Post
I can't imagine Groce will be that happy with the game, but that's ok. There clearly are plenty of things to work on and that's what this will be used for.

The one thing I was looking for I didn't really see. That was someone who had made huge strides since last year. Actually, I guess I did. Henry was very active. If he can maintain the effort he will see a lot of time at the 4 and that will be a big plus.
No coach is ever happy about any game. And I dont want them to be.

This year will be a great test of Groce's true coaching ability. Seeing how he coaches around the weaknesses on this team, and how well they improve throughout the year will show a hell of alot more than just winning when the "studs" get here.
kingmal is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:24 PM   #23
Dan
Admin
Dan's Avatar
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 25,890
Quote:
Groce: Pace was better tonight. We want to play with pace whether in full court or half court.

Groce: Liked that Brandon Paul and Tracy Abrams combined for 10-6 assist-to-turnover ratio.

http://twitter.com/WernerESPNCU
Dan is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:27 PM   #24
Illinois5
Location: Illinois
Posts: 193
So for those of you who got to watch, I ask this:

How fast paced did we really play? Any players step out of their roles from last year?
Illinois5 is offline Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2012, 08:29 PM   #25
illini73
illini73's Avatar
Location: Austin, MN
Posts: 563
Free throws, UGGH!! I like that we went 22 times to the stripe, but man you cannot miss free wide open shots.
illini73 is online now Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Fighting Illini Basketball | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Forum Jump




Follow IllinoisLoyalty on Twitter

Get Free Daily Email Updates