Illinois 88, Missouri 63 Postgame

#201      
Nope, never been. But please don't take this the wrong way but I don't see why that should make any difference. I am not a football fan but when I was going to school I went to a game (Indiana) and had a great time. Don't even remember if we won or not. I really enjoyed it but I am still not a football fan and rarely watch football. Too boring.

Last night while I was at once celebrating the victory (don't get me wrong, I am very happy Illinois won) I was also thinking about why we get so excited about this game. What is it about Missouri (I know some of you have personal reasons but try to be little objective)? Is it some kind of natural rivalry or did it become a rivalry because back in 1976 someone thought it would be a good idea to schedule Missouri (or vice versa) and it turned out to be a good thing. It grew into a great rivalry. Both teams were probably fairly even for the first 20 years or so. But there didn't seem to be a desire to create this rivalry prior to 1976. Illinois and Missouri played seven times in a little over 40 years up to 1976 (first game was 1932 which Illinois won by the whopping score 36-24). So if it was merely created we can create another one, hopefully, a better rivalry. I think starting a rivalry with a team that is at least a step up from Missouri would be good thing for the program. I think after 50 or so years maybe it is time to move on. It would take some effort but eventually I believe fans would become as fierce in their support of a different rivalry facing a different team. Everything that people have pointed out here about the attractions of this IL MO rivalry can just as easily be transferred to another rivalry. But, actually, truth be told, I really don't care. I just think it is something to think about considering the rise of Illinois basketball and the decline of Missouri's. I just think Illinois could do better.

And I know I will probably get in trouble here but I don't understand the "hate". I dislike certain teams, certain coaches. Even Bobby Knight, I dislike him immensely but I don't think I hate him. I mean, it's just a sport. It's not that important.
The only non conference game from when I was a kid was llini versus Notre Dame in Chicago. I believe it was New Year's Eve but I don't know how many years it lasted.
 
#202      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky
Well like all Mizzou fans they are a bit slow on getting it released
TMI....................on Ozark , I read an article about season # 4 's release taking 15 month's from completion of filming ......Netflix has to do dubbing for non-american audiences and other things ....i will be watching it when it air's.
 
#203      
The best of the portal centers are likely better than Dain. Hopefully we get one. No confidence that he's not another Payne.
Well the staff should get a good idea of what they have in Dainja since he can practice with the team the second semester. If they think we need another Big, they will look in the portal. Scholarships will open up as they always do when kids leave for whatever reason (I don't like naming names).
 
#204      

socalini

So Cali
What is it about Missouri (I know some of you have personal reasons but try to be little objective)?
The most populous areas of So ILL get all of their local news / media from St. Louis tv and radio stations. So, growing up, we heard about Mizzou sports all the time. As I've said before on here, when I was growing up (70s/80s), UMSL Soccer got more tic in STL media coverage than ILLINI sports did. I think that's why so many of us who ended up at Illinois see them as a big rival (or at least as someone we would like to pummel every chance we get).
 
Last edited:
#206      

Govoner Vaugn Fan

New Orleans
I do not hate any rivals, but simply pity their fate when they have the misfortune of facing the Illini. In those rare games when the Illini opponent is victorious, they did not really win but simply accumulated more points due to luck, bad officiating, or miscues by the Illini players.... Things that will easily be corrected in time for the next game. Regardless of opponent, the Illini are always the Eliterest and rightly deserving of the win. Always pity the opponent.
 
#207      

Tacomallini

Washington State
Wanna give a special shoutout to the Tums Relief Player of the Game. Kid looked solid as hell. Dudes hit shots on him but he was in great position every time. Fought through one screen like butter. That offensive rebound was not something many freshman do and showed real strength. That 3 was a beauty as was the reverse layup. His passing was crisp and unflinching. He looks dynamic and could be a big x-factor for us this year and beyond.
FIFY, and I agree 100%
 
#209      
Just a thought on this game. How many games are played every season at a neutral site where there are 9000 fans from both schools and none of any other school? Mizzou plays Kansas every year....but home and home. Maybe Cincy and Xavier compares, but that is also home and home. Same with KY and Louisville and all the others of which I am aware. It is unique. I have never been to the game, but have watched every one I could and have been to the arena for several games. Great venue with many great dining opportunities nearby.

It is my sincere desire to see this game on the schedule the rest of my life....and for the Illini to win every one. But I do hope Mizzou can improve their program. Blowouts serve no one well.
 
#210      
So, having gotten this game out of the way, here is my question. Should we (or rather, the Illini) really continue with the Braggin' Rights game with Missouri? Or should the Illini start looking for a better Braggin' Rights rival (and I don't mean start playing a different team in St. Louis)? I ask this hypothetically since I doubt there is any plan in the near future to discontinue the game. And there still seems to be a lot of passion from the fans. And there is an argument to be made about playing a game in St. Louis (not to mention the money that comes into St. Louis from fans,etc.). But let me elucidate. The following is just a jumble of random thoughts hoping to support this proposal.

First, Illinois is pretty much dominating the series. Not as much as I wish as it seems that the lesser team often wins anyway (Illinois should have won last year). There are two w/l statistics. There is the total w/l record of 33-19 (63%) but that includes games going all the way back to 1932. The official Braggin' Rights games started in 1980. Since that time the Illini lead the series 26-15 (63%). It could be argued to include the games played every year from 1976 to 1979 which probably engendered the Braggin' Rights creation in the first place. If those are included the w/l record is 28-17 (62%). I think that winning almost 2 out of every 3 games is dominance. (hopefully I did the math correctly).

Second, Illinois is arguably just a bigger basketball college than Missouri. I haven't done the research but I guess that Illinois has more NCAA tournament appearances, wins, conference titles, etc. It is one of the top 20 (maybe even top 10) winningest (is that a word) basketball programs ever (I think I read that somewhere). Missouri just isn't in the same class overall as Illinois.

Third, Norm Stewart. It seems that the series was at its best during the Norm Stewart years (1976 to 1998). During the years he coached Missouri the w/l record was 13-9, not much better for Missouri, Illinois still dominated (59%) but there seemed to be more intensity, more hype, more at stake than just winning the game. After Stewart left, Missouri fell on hard times for the most part. We had the Groce years but Illinois has recovered from those dark times while Missouri is in a death spiral (citing Rob McColley article).

Fourth Media. Weren't those early games nationally televised? I think one can see how the importance of this game fell as the years went on from being a big game on national tv to now being shown on BTN (in fact, wasn't it only available on BTN+ one year?). I am not sure if Missouri fans could even see the game yesterday if they did not have BTN.

And finally, take a look at Rob McColley article especially the last paragraph. He doesn't come right out and say it but you can kind of read between the lines.

https://www.illinoisloyalty.com/post/illinois-88-missouri-63-postgame.27659/

So with the Illini's dominance, the different traditions at both schools, the gradual lessening of the importance of this game perhaps Illinois should look elsewhere for a "Braggin' Rights" rival. I have no idea who but maybe something like playing Kentucky in Louisville (that would probably irk Louisville fans). Or maybe playing Louisville. Just putting those out as examples. I imagine that Kentucky might consider us the way I rate Missouri to Illinois.

Just my 2 cents
No. Emphatic no.

Having Braggin’ Rights is an annual opportunity to showcase Illinois basketball to a regional if not national audience. It is a Named Game.

In Washington State they have an annual football game called The Apple Cup.

The UW holds a 74-33-6 record in 120 years of play over WSU. There is NO talk whatsoever of ending the game.

Plenty of big rivalry series are fairly one-sided. I’m not following your logic.
 
Last edited:
#212      
Nope, never been. But please don't take this the wrong way but I don't see why that should make any difference. I am not a football fan but when I was going to school I went to a game (Indiana) and had a great time. Don't even remember if we won or not. I really enjoyed it but I am still not a football fan and rarely watch football. Too boring.

Last night while I was at once celebrating the victory (don't get me wrong, I am very happy Illinois won) I was also thinking about why we get so excited about this game. What is it about Missouri (I know some of you have personal reasons but try to be little objective)? Is it some kind of natural rivalry or did it become a rivalry because back in 1976 someone thought it would be a good idea to schedule Missouri (or vice versa) and it turned out to be a good thing. It grew into a great rivalry. Both teams were probably fairly even for the first 20 years or so. But there didn't seem to be a desire to create this rivalry prior to 1976. Illinois and Missouri played seven times in a little over 40 years up to 1976 (first game was 1932 which Illinois won by the whopping score 36-24). So if it was merely created we can create another one, hopefully, a better rivalry. I think starting a rivalry with a team that is at least a step up from Missouri would be good thing for the program. I think after 50 or so years maybe it is time to move on. It would take some effort but eventually I believe fans would become as fierce in their support of a different rivalry facing a different team. Everything that people have pointed out here about the attractions of this IL MO rivalry can just as easily be transferred to another rivalry. But, actually, truth be told, I really don't care. I just think it is something to think about considering the rise of Illinois basketball and the decline of Missouri's. I just think Illinois could do better.

And I know I will probably get in trouble here but I don't understand the "hate". I dislike certain teams, certain coaches. Even Bobby Knight, I dislike him immensely but I don't think I hate him. I mean, it's just a sport. It's not that important.
Big effort post to question a successful Named game rivalry.
 
Last edited:
#213      

Tacomallini

Washington State
Hard to believe BU wouldn't have taken Javon Pickett back. I have no reason to doubt the posters that say it was so, but just thinking of the state of the program at the time and how good he's been in Braggin' Rights games (up until last night, that is). I guess Illinois was harder up for bigs or there was something that made BU think he wasn't an every day guy. Thankfully the days of Matic Vesel have passed, or Parker Braun turning down an Illinois scholarship to walk-on at Mizzou.
 
#215      
Great to see the team hitting on all cylinders. Fun win to watch.

Question for all those with intense hatred of Missouri. Did you grow up in southern or central Illinois? I ask because I grew up in Chicago burbs and, while I certainly like to win Braggin’ Rights game, I just don’t have the same hatred for MO that I have for say other teams like Indiana. I’d put IU, Iowa, Purdue, UM, MSU, any top 25 team, and any team Bruce Pearl coaches as teams I want the Illini to beat more than Missouri. So I’m wondering if this hatred was bred into people because of where they group up? Again, don’t get me wrong, beating MO is great and gets better each year.
I grew up in southern Illinois. I have lived and worked in the metro east since 1989. I am not a Missouri fan or hater. But I can say there are too many Miznoz fans on this side of the river for my tastes. Also, too many good basketball and football players from the Metro East have been lost to Missouri. So put a beat down on them every chance we get to make Miznoz less appealing.
 
#217      
This may not belong here but it doesn't seem as if it needs its own thread. And it refers to our friend Mark Smith who was at Missouri. So, anyway, I found this interesting.

From the Kansas City Star

https://www.kansascity.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article256736107.html

If he could go back and do things differently, Smith thinks he would have been much better off enrolling at K-State straight out of high school rather than waiting until he was a graduate transfer who had already played one season at Illinois and three more at Missouri. “Being here now, that’s something I think about a lot,” Smith said. “I see how much my game has gotten better and how much I have developed. I am a much better basketball player now than I ever have been before. But at least I’m here now. I’m having a lot of fun.”
Mark who?
 
#218      

Tacomallini

Washington State
This may not belong here but it doesn't seem as if it needs its own thread. And it refers to our friend Mark Smith who was at Missouri. So, anyway, I found this interesting.

From the Kansas City Star

https://www.kansascity.com/sports/college/big-12/kansas-state/article256736107.html

If he could go back and do things differently, Smith thinks he would have been much better off enrolling at K-State straight out of high school rather than waiting until he was a graduate transfer who had already played one season at Illinois and three more at Missouri. “Being here now, that’s something I think about a lot,” Smith said. “I see how much my game has gotten better and how much I have developed. I am a much better basketball player now than I ever have been before. But at least I’m here now. I’m having a lot of fun.”
Well, I could've gone without reading this. I've never been more glad to be rid of Weber.

“The thing that surprised me about him is his athleticism and his strength,” Weber said. “I always tell him he’s a man child and he needs to use that body.” Weber has actually been saying things like that to Smith since he was in high school.
 
#219      
Nope, never been. But please don't take this the wrong way but I don't see why that should make any difference. I am not a football fan but when I was going to school I went to a game (Indiana) and had a great time. Don't even remember if we won or not. I really enjoyed it but I am still not a football fan and rarely watch football. Too boring.

Last night while I was at once celebrating the victory (don't get me wrong, I am very happy Illinois won) I was also thinking about why we get so excited about this game. What is it about Missouri (I know some of you have personal reasons but try to be little objective)? Is it some kind of natural rivalry or did it become a rivalry because back in 1976 someone thought it would be a good idea to schedule Missouri (or vice versa) and it turned out to be a good thing. It grew into a great rivalry. Both teams were probably fairly even for the first 20 years or so. But there didn't seem to be a desire to create this rivalry prior to 1976. Illinois and Missouri played seven times in a little over 40 years up to 1976 (first game was 1932 which Illinois won by the whopping score 36-24). So if it was merely created we can create another one, hopefully, a better rivalry. I think starting a rivalry with a team that is at least a step up from Missouri would be good thing for the program. I think after 50 or so years maybe it is time to move on. It would take some effort but eventually I believe fans would become as fierce in their support of a different rivalry facing a different team. Everything that people have pointed out here about the attractions of this IL MO rivalry can just as easily be transferred to another rivalry. But, actually, truth be told, I really don't care. I just think it is something to think about considering the rise of Illinois basketball and the decline of Missouri's. I just think Illinois could do better.

And I know I will probably get in trouble here but I don't understand the "hate". I dislike certain teams, certain coaches. Even Bobby Knight, I dislike him immensely but I don't think I hate him. I mean, it's just a sport. It's not that important.
Finding another non con team to play every year at a neutral site that would generate the interest and attendance would be difficult.

You gonna play KY in Paducah every year? Would love to hear your suggestions.
 
#220      
Finding another non con team to play every year at a neutral site that would generate the interest and attendance would be difficult.

You gonna play KY in Paducah every year? Would love to hear your suggestions.
We used to play Notre Dame in Chicago every year during the 60s. Pretty good series.
 
#221      
No. Emphatic no.

Having Braggin. Rights is an annual opportunity to showcase Illinois basketball to a regional if not national audience. It is a Named Game.
In Washington State they have an annual football game called The Apple Cup. The UW holds a 74-33-6 record in 120 years of play. There is NO talk whatsoever of ending the game.
What is your reasoning?

Plenty of big rivalry series are fairly one-sided. I’m not following your logic.
But it isn't a national game, not anymore and I think there is some reasoning behind that for the major networks. It doesn't mean much to anyone but Illinois and Missouri fans which is fine. Reasons, well I think I have gone on long enough on my reasons. But I guess it basically boils down to Illinois can do better. And I was more interested in the existential reason(s) as far as why Missouri? Why not a duck? (any Marx brothers fans here should get that reference). But seriously folks, why not someone else? Someone a step up from Missouri. I think we, well, most of us, would soon forget the Braggin' Rights games after 20 or so games with Kentucky over a span of the same number of years (that is just an example, I actually have no idea who could or would replace Missouri). We would adapt. Humans are quite adept at adapting.

I think your example of the Apple Cup is completely different. That is a game between Washington State and Univ. of Washington the two biggest state schools. Heck, if I lived in Washington I would probably like to see that every year, too. I just think it is different kind of deal. But aside from that example of being one sided and that plenty of rivalries are one sided, do you have more examples, at the major college level? Or maybe I should limit it to basketball college level. I can already think of one example in football; just about anyone Notre Dame plays every year, like Navy. Although I am not sure you would call that a rivalry. It may be just typical Notre Dame year in and year out playing the softest schedule they can.

Also, some of the responses to my posts have mentioned about how it is a fertile recruiting zone. Which I get. But how many St. Louis area players have we gotten over the years? I have no idea as I don't follow recruiting very much. So maybe a lot for all I know but I don't see anyone from that area currently on the team. Illinois did pretty well with Tilmon, Pickett and Smith all from the St. Louis area all committing before BU came and then two de-committed so that was kind of wash. Also, Illinois emphasis has always been Chicago (and Peoria). Hasn't always worked, of course.

But like I said earlier I don't really care one way or the other. It's fine if we keep playing Missouri but I just think we can do better (as I have said almost ad nauseum now). After all, there was a big rivalry game between Illinois and Missouri in football, the Arch Game?, that went from 1975 to 2010. It even engendered the Braggin' Rights series. That one was stopped, albeit I know it is going to be resurrected in a few years. I do not know why it was stopped although Illinois did not fare well. Maybe that was why although I am sure no one in an official capacity would admit that.
 
#223      
Hard to believe BU wouldn't have taken Javon Pickett back. I have no reason to doubt the posters that say it was so, but just thinking of the state of the program at the time and how good he's been in Braggin' Rights games (up until last night, that is). I guess Illinois was harder up for bigs or there was something that made BU think he wasn't an every day guy. Thankfully the days of Matic Vesel have passed, or Parker Braun turning down an Illinois scholarship to walk-on at Mizzou.
Considering his season average numbers are woeful outside of this game, it’s a literal fact that he’s not an every-day-guy.

More like a “play well when I’m motivated by being spurned” guy.

His performance last night is more indicative of his normal performance so it’s good BU didn't use a scholarship on him.
 
#224      
Hard to believe BU wouldn't have taken Javon Pickett back. I have no reason to doubt the posters that say it was so, but just thinking of the state of the program at the time and how good he's been in Braggin' Rights games (up until last night, that is). I guess Illinois was harder up for bigs or there was something that made BU think he wasn't an every day guy. Thankfully the days of Matic Vesel have passed, or Parker Braun turning down an Illinois scholarship to walk-on at Mizzou.
Speaking of Parker Braun I was just about to post a little tidbit about him. I came across his name while I was looking up the Illinois Missouri stats. I seem to remember that he came down to either Illinois or Missouri and as Tacoma said he not only chose Missouri but went as preferred walk on and turned down a full scholarship. Anyway, he transferred this year to Santa Clara. Not doing too badly there. He is a starter, just under 9 points a game, and 6.3 rebounds.