Arkansas 73, Illinois 63 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#354      
One thing really sticks out about Hawkins post game comments. The whole "we didn't move the ball, we didn't run anything" statement. Brad made the same statement to the sideline reporter at the end of the first half (of close to it).

Now why was that? I heard Underwood say it multiple times this year. Tells me there were a lot of locker room issues and internal conflicts. But honestly, if that was happening then Brad needs to fix it. That's his job. The offense was dysfunctional all year. Brads not a great offensive coach, I've said it since his first year, but this year was another level of bad.

It will be interesting to see how the roster shakes out. I really hope the three frosh stay. Most of the other guys I'm indifferent about. I'd love to have TSJ back too. With the right guys around him (where he isn't a primary ball handler) he could be outstanding next year. I can't see Dain coming back. Something seems....off there. I think everyone else is a crapshoot.
 
#356      
There is no way I'm going through the entire game thread tonight, so if this repeats !!!!, then oh well.
1) We got out-toughed way too often. The guys that are clearly bought in on the culture here were selling out and getting floor burns all over the place. The ones who aren't, weren't. And we lost way too many of those 50-50s on the glass and the floor. Arkansas is too talented to let them out-hustle you too.
2) Coleman was the best player on the floor for stretches of the game. And regardless of the team mojo, both these teams are loaded with individual talent. I really, really think he will come back and lead next year. And that's a good thing.
3) Our freshmen, to my eye, didn't look fazed. They looked like they belonged on the floor against some 5-star talent on the brightest stage. That is also a very good thing. This isn't their last rodeo.
4) Des Moines Arena isn't the worst place to see a basketball game. But I'm sure glad Omaha is a first round host next year.
5) AR fans were cool - I even got a kid next to me to start yelling random foods during FT attempts just like I do.
6) It pays to have an orange blazer in the closet. People dig it.
7) As soon as Coleman hit that first baby hook in the paint, I thought, maybe this team gets it and then we just went to pieces on offense. Like literally individual pieces.
8) This team frequently reminded me this year of the 98-99 team. There was clearly something really good there, and you could see it in the freshmen. But it certainly clicked the next season and the season after that...so, I'm disappointed its over but the optimist in me thinks this will just be part of the evolution towards a title shot soon.
 
#357      
There's a lot of doom and gloom about the future of the program, most of it based around how the freshmen performed this season. Those people seem to be forgetting part of the point of Underwood's "Get Old, Stay Old" mantra is getting guys who are going to stick around for 3-4 years to develop. COVID messed up the balance a bit, and I believe with TSJ (assuming he leaves) and MM gone we'll see better team chemistry next year.
I'm not sure about doom but I'm feeling pretty gloomy and it's not about the student athletes. I'm extremely disappointed in the staff. We got worse as the season progressed. We suck at free throws, an unguarded mid-range shot. We struggle with layups. We are sloppy passers. We've struggled with turnovers at times and played brilliantly at times. The talent is there, but there's no focus. The body language of our players often looked like they had been beaten before the game ended. We're the worst three point shooting team in the B1G and our start to the game had us driving and kicking the ball out for open threes? We missed those shots btw and who could have seen THAT coming? Penn St. beat us three times in a single season. We had Coleman out at the point dribbling the ball multiple times tonight waiting for the shot clock to reach zero or turning the ball over. That's not a game plan. And that lack of game plan seemed to be a story on and off all season. I don't think Brad's on any kind of hot seat, but I think he needs to think long and hard about making some changes. The chemistry on this team was basically non-existent. I look forward to seeing how Coach Underwood turns this around next fall.
 
#358      
The postgame video snippets of him are clearly evident of a player who cares deeply about this program, and feels responsible for its success.

That gives me hope that he won't bail unless his professional options are compelling.

Hawkins definitely cares. Unfortunately I think he’s been coached very poorly during his time here. He’s been given the green light by his coach who calls him an “elite shooter”, but shoots well under 30% from 3. Brad also has him handling the ball 30-40 feet from the basket which leads to turnovers.

Hawkins should have been in the paint all season. Protecting the rim on defense and getting his offense near the basket. No dribbling. No shooting 3s. I feel like maybe one of the reasons he’s been here is Brad’s promise to allow him to do the NBA stretch 4, when his best college usage is just be a simple in the paint big man. Very frustrating player to watch but I blame the coach for not reigning him in
 
#359      
My

My belief all year was that BU did not have the discipline needed to ensure success of the program and of the players. This comment from CH kind of backs that up. I don't think you have to be an ahole coach, but the players need to know that to play consistently you need to respect the coach, the team, other players and the University. Just my opinion.
Sometimes a single loss can be worth getting what's next on tape for posterity. If anyone wants to get all weepy about getting yelled at during a TO next year, Brad can simply point to what a bunch of talent with discipline issues does in the modern NCAA tournament. It loses. Early.
 
#360      

azillini1

Scottsdale
Pretty sure Skyy lost some major tick due to performance and others earning more PT, and he ended up quitting. Dain saw a major reduction in minutes late in games down the stretch. Heck, RJ was suspended for a game due to breaking team rules. Could there have been more accountability, sure..but then we would be playing walk on players. Even then some would complain.

Brad tried to put us in best chance to win, but with this team, I am not sure what more could have been done.
I can name at least 10 coaches who would not allow a player to consistently not run plays or to follow the game plan. If the player consistently did what he wanted versus the coach, the player would sit until they figured it out. Cronin, Huggins, Few, Barnes, etc. would never let the problems persist all year.
 
#362      
I can name at least 10 coaches who would not allow a player to consistently not run plays or to follow the game plan. If the player consistently did what he wanted versus the coach, the player would sit until they figured it out. Cronin, Huggins, Few, Barnes, etc. would never let the problems persist all year.
I don’t disagree with your sentiment.
And to prove it…here’s a post I made in December:

1146D4FE-2FA9-4585-9099-A1410716CACE.jpeg



But honestly…how can you speak to what 10 different D1 basketball coaches would do?How could you possibly know that for sure?
 
#363      

DeonThomas

South Carolina
Not bothering to read anything else in this thread, so I'm sure I'm being redundant:

- Just not a very fun season; better than the John Groce years for certain, but this team never did play team-first ball
- Can't blame it on all the newcomers, because lots of successful teams excel with 5-6-7-8 new players each year
- Speculating we're now set up for a lot of transfers-out. But I sure hope the core group stays.
- Epps and Rodgers will start next year
- I want Hawkins to return (not because he's a sure-fire NBA lottery type guy), but for culture continuity. Should be the face of the program.
- RJ and Luke are just role-players, and likely will be for the next two years. (Luke should have red-shirted).
 
#368      

DeonThomas

South Carolina
Trying to think back if the word "ELITE" should have ever been used in discussing our players or program during the 2022-23 season. Jalen Pickett is my gold standard when using the word.

As such, I think maybe TSJ's performance against UCLA qualifies. But little else.
 
#372      
And frankly, this is why so many people started to walk back their expectations. It was so so obvious that we had players who weren't bought in.

And the damning part was that we just kept giving those players the keys to the team.
He put all the Easter Eggs in one basket. And when he figured out a couple were rotten and some others slightly contaminated by the rotten ones it was too late to get more before Easter. Lol

Brad realized he had to roll with it at a certain point. We basically saw him go through the kubler-ross stages
of grief before our very eyes. Lol

(I mean seriously…think back to all that happened…)
Boy you can bet he was relieved the season was over.
 
Last edited:
#373      
Hawkins definitely cares. Unfortunately I think he’s been coached very poorly during his time here. He’s been given the green light by his coach who calls him an “elite shooter”, but shoots well under 30% from 3. Brad also has him handling the ball 30-40 feet from the basket which leads to turnovers.

Hawkins should have been in the paint all season. Protecting the rim on defense and getting his offense near the basket. No dribbling. No shooting 3s. I feel like maybe one of the reasons he’s been here is Brad’s promise to allow him to do the NBA stretch 4, when his best college usage is just be a simple in the paint big man. Very frustrating player to watch but I blame the coach for not reigning him in
You have some things right here (yes, Coleman does really care) , but my guess is that Coleman coaching problem began a long time ago in Sacramento. Think about it. Coleman already showed talent as a sophomore, but he couldn't hold a starting position because of his turnovers and his bad outside shooting streaks. When guys like Coleman are well coached at a young age (he wasn't), they learn to take advantage of the height, jumping ability, and quickness. Coleman has improved over the years (I really like the way he played in the last game against Penn State and on his first shot tonight), but he was allowed to play too much on the perimeter for a guy who will never be a great shooter (a little too flat). Heck, I will go so far as saying that don't like the idea of a "point center". It might actually work for Illinois when we have no Kofi or Dain in foul trouble against a dominant 7-foot center. But, in general, you should not have your tallest guy out on the perimeter, 20 feet from the basket. The Sacramento coaches should have known that. The Illinois coaches should have known that too (although it was already late to change it). Even Coleman should have known that. My guess is that he would have had much better college #s (higher shooting percentage, fewer turnovers) had everyone insisted that he learned to play better near the basket.

And while I'm at it, Coleman has a bad habit of long risky (often cross-court) passes (many of which result in TOs). This is related to discipline, and it is the accumulation of years of bad coaching and Coleman's own relaxed attitude about improving this. Coleman really isn't ready for the pro level. He needs to work on these things and becoming a reliable scorer who regularly gets shots in the paint and only settles for longer shots when defenders give him tons of space.
 
#374      

Whitmans Sampler

Eastern Iowa
Should we be though? A guy (18 year old at that) that takes himself out of a game, refuses to go back in and then shoulders a coach. Is that what we really want and need for the next 3 years? More individuals instead of team guys?

I don't care if he scores 50 points a game if we score 62 as a team, we need team players that understand chemistry and love thy teammates/coaches!
Wait, this actually happened? He refused to go back in the game? Also, from my seats it looked like he and Mayer were chatting it up on the bench most of the 2nd half. Neither was very engaged.
 
#375      
Hawkins definitely cares. Unfortunately I think he’s been coached very poorly during his time here. He’s been given the green light by his coach who calls him an “elite shooter”, but shoots well under 30% from 3. Brad also has him handling the ball 30-40 feet from the basket which leads to turnovers.

Hawkins should have been in the paint all season.
Protecting the rim on defense and getting his offense near the basket. No dribbling. No shooting 3s. I feel like maybe one of the reasons he’s been here is Brad’s promise to allow him to do the NBA stretch 4, when his best college usage is just be a simple in the paint big man. Very frustrating player to watch but I blame the coach for not reigning him in

I appreciate that coach uses media statements to build up his players. We fans probably shouldn't assume all media statements equate directly to player instructions and game plans.

Though I like what CH can do in the paint, and want to see him do it more regularly, restricting him to the paint would be wasting a competitive advantage. I can't argue with the fact that he took too many threes. If he gets more selective, the percentage should rise to a respectable number.

When daydreaming about next year, we should remember that players can improve. CH averaged 32mpg this year - up from 19 and 6 the previous two seasons. That dramatic of a leap represents an entirely new level of responsibility. Applying his intelligence to that new body of game-play experience could make for a very productive off-season - a possibility made more likely when a player is invested, as CH seems to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.