Last year which was a weird tournament had 0 5 stars and all teams average player was outside the top 100
2022 6 with 4 on Duke 2 on UNC
More history look here
View attachment 29372
Stadium - Post
watchstadium.com
I find these kinds of articles interesting, but at the end of the day, useless. Reason I say that is you almost certainly need a couple future NBA level guys to make a deep run and potentially win it all, but I don't think the recruiting services are anywhere near reliable enough to play the odds. We've seen lots of loaded college rosters that didn't have the secret sauce, and we've seen others that don't fit the bill emerge as epic teams. I find this data interesting because it's useful to know about where the averages are, but only a gifted staff knows the balance they can achieve with their resources, play style, and perhaps most importantly, intangibles like character. And even then, it's something of a crap shoot.
I get the impression that this staff finds young recruits risky in many ways, but particularly in having the maturity to buy in and do the work without giving in to the whispers and voices that can ruin team chemistry. At the same time, this program won't have the raw dollars to throw at "potential" as a Duke or Kentucky will. This staff is smart and determined, and they've seemed to look for a niche. And I think this team is among the most promising yet. We've got some young talent that has serious potential, and we've got a mix of older guys that have maturity and if not NBA level talent, close to it.
The landscape has changed and will keep changing. As fans, we complain about losing and don't argue with success. We get to see what happened. They have to project how a player, and all the pieces will fit months or years before it happens.