Illwinsagain
- Cary, IL
Yes, I would guess that would mean Tuesday (business days).Sounds like I heard that this panel meets within 48 hours. Is this correct?
Yes, I would guess that would mean Tuesday (business days).Sounds like I heard that this panel meets within 48 hours. Is this correct?
I feel the same way and it seems nobody else felt he should be in trouble eitherI don’t know if it’s my own biases, but this did not sound like a man who thinks TSJ is guilty, and honestly seems pissed off that it’s gotten this far. I didn’t hear a single negative word about TSJ, didn’t hear the word victim, and we got a lot of info about how the panel works and makes decisions. I’ve gone from thinking TJ will never suit up again to “it’s not unlikely.”
Brad Underwood, Coleman and Loren TateAnyone know who's on the DIA panel?
It's not a DIA panel. It's actually an independent 3-person panel consisting of a faculty member from the Law School and two others.Josh Whitman stated that Terrence can play if there is a resolution to the legal process or the 3 person DIA panel votes to reinstate him before the legal process finishes. His status is on life support, but not dead yet - my words, not his.
Josh also stated that the panel is determinary, not advisory. Neither he the AD nor Robert Jones the Chancellor can overrule it, and whatever decision it makes is final.
It's not final. It's indefinite.Josh Whitman stated that Terrence can play if there is a resolution to the legal process or the 3 person DIA panel votes to reinstate him before the legal process finishes. His status is on life support, but not dead yet - my words, not his.
Josh also stated that the panel is determinary, not advisory. Neither he the AD nor Robert Jones the Chancellor can overrule it, and whatever decision it makes is final.
No. He said 48 hours from the initial suspension. Which was ThursdayYes, I would guess that would mean Tuesday (business days).
Maybe I'm too "glass half full", but he referred to the University having no tolerance for sexual abuse of any kind at least twice. Which makes me think he thinks the incident in the bar IS something the University has to distance itself from. But, again, just my opinion.I don’t know if it’s my own biases, but this did not sound like a man who thinks TSJ is guilty, and honestly seems pissed off that it’s gotten this far. I didn’t hear a single negative word about TSJ, didn’t hear the word victim, and we got a lot of info about how the panel works and makes decisions. I’ve gone from thinking TJ will never suit up again to “it’s not unlikely.”
It wasn't a random tweet. It just happened to be a random person who was the first to tweet that image publicly. They aren't the source, at least if I guessed.!!!!!!!!. Man I’m furious. This is going to ruin the kids life. Two drunk stupid kids hooking up in a bar. Goddamn it!
Starting to think that weird random tweet had some validity.
I’m saying it. This “me too” movement has gone too far. Unfortunately I’ve seen this happen to clients of mine and have been called to the stands because of nonsense like this. The accusers have complete immunity.
Anyone know who's on the DIA panel?
I need the names so I know who to address the gift baskets to
Are you surprised?...and Kansas PD is shady and bad with paperwork/communication
You may be correct, I just assumed business days. Most university personnel will not be working tomorrow - Monday.No. He said 48 hours from the initial suspension. Which was Thursday
Can someone give me the rundown on what this consisted of. I couldn't keep reading about tsj.Josh Whitman just confirmed the "inappropriate touching in a bar" story on 1400AM.
Yes I am correct. And the business day calendar (if it is business days) started yesterday, not as of the press conference.You may be correct, I just assumed business days. Most university personnel will not be working tomorrow - Monday.
And Monday is a holidayYou may be correct, I just assumed business days. Most university personnel will not be working tomorrow - Monday.
This is something I've been wondering as well. Best I can come up with is that it takes time to get in front of a judge to make the case for a warrant. Idk if 3 weeks is a normal time frame, so maybe some of the attorneys on this sub can chime in. There is also the apparent icy relationship between the Douglas County DA and local judges, so maybe that played some role in the delay in issuing a warrant... pure speculation obviously.. crazy times.is it normal that the charge happened on December 5th, and he wasn't booked until yesterday? that just seems really odd to me.