Coaching Carousel (Basketball)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#376      
I made a post earlier this week stating something similar to what you’re saying … There are quite a few coaches who have no interest coming here because of that reason …

They saw Hamer running the defense instead of Chester …

They see Brad only talking to Tyler during games and letting him run the offense …

And they hear the main reasons why TA left …

Makes it a lot less attractive …
Maybe spell it out- What do coaches not like about working with Brad?
 
#378      
A bad season at Illinois can reasonably and objectively be defined as getting an NCAA tournament seed worse than #7.

This is our median seed since seeding began and accounts for seasons where we missed the tournament.

But if you take out the Groce and sanction years, then the median is a 5 seed.
What number are you using for years where we missed the tournament? When you say seeding began, do you mean field expanded to 64(+)?
 
#379      
We shouldn't get wrapped around the axle on the difference between "talent" and "impact player".

Ayo, Kofi and TSJ were all All-Americans, players who completely dominated college basketball.

Between the incoming player classes of 2004 to 2017, the entirety of two coaching administrations, we didn't bring in a single player with anything close to that kind of impact. (I think the only All-B1G First Team selection in that span was Demetri McCamey, correct me if I'm wrong, Hill, Paul and Leonard were not)

KJ and Riley have future upside as true stars in the NBA, they could end up among the most famous basketball players on earth, but it's very rare for freshman to have that kind of impact in college, especially during this era.
Yes on KJ and Riley. There isn’t necessarily a lot of overlap between those who will make the most money playing basketball and those that are the most impactful college players.

It’s fun to have bragging rights watching guys in the league, but if I had to choose between having Zach Edey or Luka Garza (multi year college NPOYS who will likely be role players at best) on my college team vs say, a Devin Booker (NBA superstar who played one fairly uneventful season at U.K., winning SEC sixth man of the year) I would take the former. And Brad has won big with those types of players so interesting he pivoted to one n dones this year.
 
#380      
What number are you using for years where we missed the tournament? When you say seeding began, do you mean field expanded to 64(+)?
For purposes of finding the median, it doesn't really matter what number you use. But I used (n+1) where n = (total number of teams in the field / 4).

If you're interested in the mean using those numbers, it would be a 9 seed or a 5 seed if you take out the Groce / sanction years.

NCAA seeding began in 1979 with a field of 40 teams. It increased to 48 teams the following year, increased to 64 teams in 1985, and increased to 68 in 2011.
 
#381      
I made a post earlier this week stating something similar to what you’re saying … There are quite a few coaches who have no interest coming here because of that reason …

They saw Hamer running the defense instead of Chester …

They see Brad only talking to Tyler during games and letting him run the offense …

And they hear the main reasons why TA left …

Makes it a lot less attractive …
In any organization, the best indicator of the organization's long term success is the quality of people the CEO and upper management bring in. This is definitely the case in football - does anyone think Dabo Swinney has much direct impact on game plans or player development? Basketball is different in that the organizations are much smaller and the HC can have much more direct involvement in these areas. But the same principle holds - if you don't surround yourself with good people you will underachieve. Brad has done that to an extreme degree this year. I think he can and will change that in the offseason. But if he is unwilling or unable to do so, then Josh should waste no time in finding a new coach
 
#382      
BU’s tournament record leaves a lot to be desired. There’s no doubt he can deliver regular-season wins, which was something we desperately needed. However, to take the team to the next level in the tournament, we may need to look for a different coach.

2014: Lost Second Round
2015: Lost First Round
2016: Lost Second Round
2017: Lost First Round
2018: Missed Tournament
2019: Missed Tournament
2020: Covid
2021: Lost second Round as a one seed
2022: Lost Second Round
2023: Lost First Round
2024: Lost Sweet 16 to eventual NC

You already forgot we made the Elite 8 last year? Seems unfair also to use 2014-2016 when he was a 12 seed, 12 seed, and 14 seed. He beat a 5 seed as a 12 that first year too which you just defined as "Lost Second Round".

Plenty of things to be unhappy with Brad about (and I am!), but no need to mislead with missing context and obfuscation of facts.
 
#384      
If you need help to identify that talent level I recommend you check the rafters
If you understood the meaning of generational then all those guys would be all stars in the NBA at minimum.

Like c'mon now... Kofi isn't even the best B1G big man of the 2020s and he's somehow generational?
 
#385      
not sure those were his issues. just seemed like he had more difficulty connecting with recruits
I do agree that he had a huge issue with that but I also think that connections may have been less important if bank accounts were being filled.
 
#387      
If you understood the meaning of generational then all those guys would be all stars in the NBA at minimum.

Like c'mon now... Kofi isn't even the best B1G big man of the 2020s and he's somehow generational?
Yes. In my time watching ILL basketball, I've only seen one other guy even close to that level of big man dominance and that's Deon Thomas.

In Illinois history, that's one in 30 years. If that's not "generational", I'm not sure what you're defining.
 
#388      
I do agree that he had a huge issue with that but I also think that connections may have been less important if bank accounts were being filled.
Anyone who believes Weber was a great leader of men need just watch the "5-finger vs fist" pregame "hype" (I use that term loosely) speech Bubbles game before the title game in '05. Absolutely hilarious stuff lol
 
#389      
If you consider getting a 7 seed in the tournament a "bad" season, I suppose. Oh how our standards have changed.
Wait, Illinois was a 9 seed two seasons ago, right? Are you talking about THIS season, where we have no idea what seed Illinois will be?
 
#390      
Maybe spell it out- What do coaches not like about working with Brad?

Too much pizza?


6d9c54b5-41d6-45ff-bfbc-42b0e015a8d5_text.gif
 
#391      
This.

Without the 2 players you mentioned along with Ayo what would Brad's record be?
Funny how Brad doesn’t get credit for coaching these generational talents when they weren’t yet generational talents. TSJ was phenomenal his super senior year but nowhere near that his regular senior year. Or the three previous years before that. In Ayo’s freshman year we saw the promise, but he still played on a losing team.

Now I ask… who coached those players to their level greatness?

Any one of our stud freshmen might eventually reach TSJ/Ayo levels of greatness if they stay. Of course, in this new world, that’s a very huge if. But contact like Ayo and TSJ were all-century right from the start. They had to learn and grow - just like KJ, Will and Tomi will — if not here, then somewhere else.
 
#394      
As I reflect on things, I think this season will help Brad significantly change his approach. Will that drive meaningful change? I guess we'll find out.

For all hyper-successful leaders, there is always an element of 'stubbornness' or resistance to change at the drop of a hat. That is part of what makes many of these people hyper-successful.

That said, many people's refusal to make certain changes or evolve as leaders also keeps them from reaching the top of the mountain. We'll see what the offseason brings, and hopefully, we will look back at this year as a much-needed speedbump that helped elevate the Illini to the next tier.
 
#395      
Yes. In my time watching ILL basketball, I've only seen one other guy even close to that level of big man dominance and that's Deon Thomas.

In Illinois history, that's one in 30 years. If that's not "generational", I'm not sure what you're defining.

Generational doesn't mean that he was good relative to other players that have ever played at Illinois. It means that of an entire generation (or usually a long timeframe), you are a unique 1 of 1. Zion, Kevin Durant, and Anthony Davis are probably the only generational players who have come through CBB in the last 25 years.

With your logic, if Morez transferred down to like Illinois State and dominated the MVC, he would somehow be a generational player because most ISU fans would've never seen a player like that play for them.
 
#396      
Yes. In my time watching ILL basketball, I've only seen one other guy even close to that level of big man dominance and that's Deon Thomas.

In Illinois history, that's one in 30 years. If that's not "generational", I'm not sure what you're defining.
So then you mean “generational at Illinois” talent. Fair enough. But then I’ll ask, who was the coach who brought in that “generational at Illinois” talent?

Seems disingenuous to criticize the man for winning with the type of player that only one other coach in 30 years could get to come through the doors.
 
#397      
So then you mean “generational at Illinois” talent. Fair enough. But then I’ll ask, who was the coach who brought in that “generational at Illinois” talent?

Seems disingenuous to criticize the man for winning with the type of player that only one other coach in 30 years could get to come through the doors.

They were also not top 10 recruits so one would be required to apply some credit in the area of player development as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back