I forgot Texas A&M in my previous comment, they're in the AAU. If A&M wanted to leave the SEC, either to get away from Texas again or become of potential future ESPN money issues, I would be open to having the Aggies join the B1G, their crazy rituals and all.If Oregon or Washington don't move the needle enough right now to make it worthwhile financially, I dont think Mizzou does.
Texas A&M or Florida would certainly move the needle.
It’s all about viewership. Mizzou doesn’t move the needle.I know that Mizzou really doesn't bring anything to the table, and I hate those SOBs. But I really think they belong in the Big Ten...
I generally like it. Iowa rivalries seem the most spot on. Nebraska/USC seems like a natural historical (going back a bit) powers rivalry. Michigan State football gets screwed. It also just looks strange with UCLA having any BIG "rivals". I guess they need to start somewhere. 15 years from now it wont seem that way I guess.Ok, after tweaking this many times, I think I have the perfect permanent rivalries. Only one team is upset, but I think its so good for everyone else it makes all the sense.
Illinois: Northwestern Purdue UCLA
Indiana: Purdue Maryland UCLA
Iowa: Minnesota Wisconsin Nebraska
Maryland: Rutgers Penn State Indiana
Michigan: Ohio State Michigan State Purdue
Michigan State: Michigan Penn State USC
Minnesota: Wisconsin Iowa Nebraska
Nebraska: Iowa Minnesota USC
Northwestern: Illinois Rutgers Wisconsin
Ohio State: Michigan Penn State Rutgers
Penn State: Ohio State Michigan State Maryland
Purdue: Indiana Illinois Michigan
Rutgers: Maryland Northwestern Ohio State
UCLA: USC Illinois Indiana
USC: UCLA Nebraska Michigan State
Wisconsin: Minnesota Iowa Northwestern
I know that Mizzou really doesn't bring anything to the table, and I hate those SOBs. But I really think they belong in the Big Ten...
It’s all about viewership. Mizzou doesn’t move the needle.
Ok, after tweaking this many times, I think I have the perfect permanent rivalries. Only one team is upset, but I think its so good for everyone else it makes all the sense.
Illinois: Northwestern Purdue UCLA
Indiana: Purdue Maryland UCLA
Iowa: Minnesota Wisconsin Nebraska
Maryland: Rutgers Penn State Indiana
Michigan: Ohio State Michigan State Purdue
Michigan State: Michigan Penn State USC
Minnesota: Wisconsin Iowa Nebraska
Nebraska: Iowa Minnesota USC
Northwestern: Illinois Rutgers Wisconsin
Ohio State: Michigan Penn State Rutgers
Penn State: Ohio State Michigan State Maryland
Purdue: Indiana Illinois Michigan
Rutgers: Maryland Northwestern Ohio State
UCLA: USC Illinois Indiana
USC: UCLA Nebraska Michigan State
Wisconsin: Minnesota Iowa Northwestern
Please no MiznozWell, you can't leave us hanging like that. Miznoz? Arkansas? Vanderbilt? Texas? Alabama?
Michigan State basically has two "rivals" in the current Big Ten, and as Tom Fornelli points out, what are we even doing if there isn't a Spartans vs. Trojans rivalry moving forward. MSU would kick and scream, but everyone else would be happy enough that I say just get it doneI generally like it. Iowa rivalries seem the most spot on. Nebraska/USC seems like a natural historical (going back a bit) powers rivalry. Michigan State football gets screwed. It also just looks strange with UCLA having any BIG "rivals". I guess they need to start somewhere. 15 years from now it wont seem that way I guess.
Michigan State basically has two "rivals" in the current Big Ten, and as Tom Fornelli points out, what are we even doing if there isn't a Spartans vs. Trojans rivalry moving forward. MSU would kick and scream, but everyone else would be happy enough that I say just get it done![]()
given Nebraskas recent history, if things were to have gone the same way they have for them, since joining the B1G, no friggin way would they have received an invite these days. They were super lucky to join when they did.If we hold to the AAU requirement, then Vandy, Mizzou, Texas, and Florida would be in play.
I remember in 2010 when Nebraska joined the B1G, Mizzou thought that they would be joining within a few days/weeks, so they may get jumpy pretty quickly. Texas is Texas, they crave attention and cannot stand being out of the limelight. My bet would be Mizzou first, then Texas, then TBD.
Don't like the Illinois rivalries. Other than UCLA, no pizzazz. My preference would be to add Miznoz to the B1G and replace Purdue with Miznoz, GREAT rivalry potential.Ok, after tweaking this many times, I think I have the perfect permanent rivalries. Only one team is upset, but I think its so good for everyone else it makes all the sense.
Illinois: Northwestern Purdue UCLA
Indiana: Purdue Maryland UCLA
Iowa: Minnesota Wisconsin Nebraska
Maryland: Rutgers Penn State Indiana
Michigan: Ohio State Michigan State Purdue
Michigan State: Michigan Penn State USC
Minnesota: Wisconsin Iowa Nebraska
Nebraska: Iowa Minnesota USC
Northwestern: Illinois Rutgers Wisconsin
Ohio State: Michigan Penn State Rutgers
Penn State: Ohio State Michigan State Maryland
Purdue: Indiana Illinois Michigan
Rutgers: Maryland Northwestern Ohio State
UCLA: USC Illinois Indiana
USC: UCLA Nebraska Michigan State
Wisconsin: Minnesota Iowa Northwestern
I mean sure, I would like Missouri in the conference, but that isn't happening right now...Don't like the Illinois rivalries. Other than UCLA, no pizzazz. My preference would be to add Miznoz to the B1G and replace Purdue with Miznoz, GREAT rivalry potential.
I agree with Redwing that I'd like Mizzou to be in the B1G, as a good rivalry game, but I also do not see that happening anytime soon, unless the SEC has a major meltdown. Instead, I hope that we can start an annual nonconference series with them in football, similar to basketball. I believe that we have games scheduled with them starting in a few years.I mean sure, I would like Missouri in the conference, but that isn't happening right now...
And I'm not sure how much more pizzazz you need if we have a road game at the Rose Bowl every other year. If you don't want us to be paired with Northwestern and Purdue, well I'd brace yourself to be disappointed.
as long as the game is not ever played in the Jones Dome on opening weekendI agree with Redwing that I'd like Mizzou to be in the B1G, as a good rivalry game, but I also do not see that happening anytime soon, unless the SEC has a major meltdown. Instead, I hope that we can start an annual nonconference series with them in football, similar to basketball. I believe that we have games scheduled with them starting in a few years.
I was at 3 of those games as an MI member. The vibe was electric but I agree that Illinois-Mizzou would be a good week 2 or 3 game in Champaign or Columbia.as long as the game is not ever played in the Jones Dome on opening weekend
Interesting, although unequal distribution discussions always make me a bit uncomfortable…Florida State making noise.
![]()
FSU football: Michael Alford pulls no punches with ACC Conference
FSU football and FSU sports, in general, have carried the ACC Conference since joining in the early 90s. Despite the worst stretch of years in our lifetime...chopchat.com
its a set up for failure and I highly doubt it ever gets considered.Interesting, although unequal distribution discussions always make me a bit uncomfortable…
I am not against Illinois' likely annual opponents - I can support playing for Lincoln's Hat and the Purdue Cannon each year - but why does Indiana have Michigan instead of Michigan State? Indiana and MSU play for the 'Old Brass Spittoon' and I hoped that the powers that be would attempt to favor rivalries, when possible.CBS Sports predicts permanent opponents in new Big Ten schedule
Illinois
Northwestern Purdue UCLA
Indiana
Michigan Northwestern Purdue
Iowa
Minnesota Nebraska Wisconsin
Maryland
Minnesota Penn State Rutgers
Michigan
Indiana Michigan State Ohio State
Michigan St.
Michigan Rutgers USC
Minnesota
Iowa Maryland Wisconsin
Nebraska
Iowa UCLA Wisconsin
Northwestern
Illinois Indiana USC
Ohio State
Michigan Penn State Purdue
Penn State
Maryland Ohio State Rutgers
Purdue
Illinois Indiana Ohio State
Rutgers
Maryland Michigan State Penn State
UCLA
Illinois Nebraska USC
USC
Michigan State Northwestern UCLA
Wisconsin
Iowa Minnesota Nebraska
it makes sense to me. Im fine with that
You could swap Indiana and Rutgers between Michigan and Michigan State, but Rutgers would end up with Maryland, Michigan and Penn State. That's a tough draw.I am not against Illinois' likely annual opponents - I can support playing for Lincoln's Hat and the Purdue Cannon each year - but why does Indiana have Michigan instead of Michigan State? Indiana and MSU play for the 'Old Brass Spittoon' and I hoped that the powers that be would attempt to favor rivalries, when possible.
Does aau really mean anything anymore?With all due respect, and remember I'm saying with all due respect, the US News and World Report rankings ain't worth a velvet painting of a whale and a dolphin getting it on. Neither of those schools are AAU and that's an automatic disqualifer for anyone that isn't Notre Dame.