Also on the note of schedule strength, I understand that the
KenPom Rankings are not the same as the NET Rankings ... but we don't get a peak at the NET until several weeks into the season. So, if you just use those linked rankings as a substitute for the NET Rankings as an interesting exercise, this would be our schedule by Quad classification as of today:
Quad 1 Games
1-30 Home, 1-50 Neutral, 1-75 Away
at #3 Purdue
vs. #5 UConn (New York, NY)
vs. #9 Tennessee (Nashville, TN)
at #10 UCLA
vs. #11 Michigan
vs. #12 Texas Tech
vs. #20 Wisconsin
at #22 USC
vs. #23 Alabama (Chicago, IL)
at #25 Michigan State
at #27 Ohio State
vs. #28 Missouri (St. Louis, MO)
at #34 Maryland
at #46 Iowa
at #51 Nebraska
at #57 Northwestern
Quad 2 Games
31-75 Home, 51-100 Neutral, 76-135 Away
vs. #34 Maryland
vs. #37 Oregon
vs. #40 Indiana
vs. #45 Washington
vs. #51 Nebraska
vs. #57 Northwestern
vs. #73 Minnesota
vs. #95 Penn State (Philadelphia, PA)
Quad 3 Games
76-160 Home, 101-200 Neutral, 135-240 Away
vs. #85 Rutgers
Quad 4 Games
161-353 Home, 201-353 Neutral, 241-353 Away
vs. #165 Southern
vs. #184 FGCU
vs. #205 Colgate
vs. #247 UTRGV
vs. #252 Jackson State
vs. #287 LIU
And this is how Big Ten Tournament opponents (obviously on a neutral court) would break down:
Quad 1: #3 Purdue, #10 UCLA, #11 Michigan, #20 Wisconsin, #22 USC, #25 Michigan State, #27 Ohio State, #34 Maryland, #37 Oregon, #40 Indiana, #45 Washington, #46 Iowa
Quad 2: #51 Nebraska, #57 Northwestern, #73 Minnesota, #85 Rutgers, #95 Penn State
Quad 3: N/A
Quad 4: N/A
16 Quad 1 games and 8 Quad 2 games before the BTT would be very good for the resume! Gotta win a lot of them, of course, but the reason last year's team was a #7 seed with a 21-12 record was definitely because we were 8-10 in Quad 1 games and 7-2 in Quad 2 games.