Found Bernstein's comments. I don't think he was bagging on us unfairly. I think he was being sincere and made some decent points. Here is what he said.
Underwood has done a nice job putting a floor in for the program. Didn't say he stinks or anything. Just needs to adjust his system.
Here were his criticisms.
1. Don't set enough ball screens for guards to get good shots or get to the basket. (fair)
2. System 4 out 1 in is a dated offense and easy to guard. (I think this was a product of personnel and Bernstein doesn’t get that)
3. How can you complain about defensive rebounding when you have 4 guys around the arc. (fair)
4. Sampson went to the NBA to learn offense. High pick n roll leads to open corner 3's. We don't use the corner well.
5. Don't get anything going downhill. We don't have guards that can take their man off the dribble so you need to set more screens.
6. Shouldn't have benched Curbelo, I know he played like garbage but he's a high variance guy and he could play us back into the game. Said, if I'm Curbelo I'm gone. Transferring immediately. How could you trust Underwood after that? Said maybe there is something else there we don’t know about. (TCTORNADO said there was an argument with staff at half so…)
7. Can’t come out of a timeout and make an end bound pass (fair point). You can't turn the ball over when you are the one initiating the action.
8. Underwood's done some great things but has to adjust. You had two all-time greats in program history 2 years in a row and have nothing to show for it.
He’s right Underwood has laid a great foundation…
1.) More Ball Screens…okay. I don’t disagree with certain line ups (Curbelo…and Trent) Ball screens ARE quite efficient and you get a lot of bang for the buck…yet defenses devote a lot of time in preparing for them. My point is there’s a lot ways to skin a cat. Ever see Bellarmine? They have one of the most efficient offenses in the NCAA and they don’t do it with ball screens.
2.) 4 out 1 in…refers to the formation that they initially start out in. It is not an offense, in and of itself…And yes you’re right. I don’t think he gets it at all…We’ve got a an All-American D.Mutumbo-type center with a back to the basket skill set. What does he think Underwood should do? Play 5 out Nelly-Ball completely ignoring our team’s unique personnel situation in favor of doing what’s in vogue…just because? Bad idea.
3.)You mean “offensive” rebounding?
otherwise this does not make sense to me.
We set up on the arc on offense. So we
would be rebounding “offensively” from there. We are where we are on defense relative to the ball and where the offense is…so that’s the starting point from which
we get defensive rebounds…so yeah I dunno? But if he’s saying the spacing is a problem in rebounding…I don’t get that either. There are only so many offensive
formations/sets and they’re all pretty much spaced 15-18 feet apart…even after they
become distorted the spacing is maintained…so it ends up being pretty similar for defensive rebounding. Every team has to deal with that. That comment doesn’t hold up.
4.) High pick and roll leads to corner 3’s…it isn’t that simple.
5.) More movement…I agree…but purposeful movement and not just for
movement’s sake…which is often suggested.
6.) Curbelo? I defer to Brad. We don’t know what happened and neither does Bernstein.
7.) I agree…and I think he will. Give him time..Remember when Self first went to Kansas…didn’t he get bounced in the 1st round a time or two…? At Kansas?? Hard to believe now. (Self took over for a damn solid coach in Lon here )and a hall of famer in Roy there…Underwood certainly wasn’t so lucky. This is just another hurdle.