Illinois 81, Washington 77 Postgame

Status
Not open for further replies.
#104      
I’m just a lowly high school coach, but learned this from a great mentor of mine. Here you go, Brad.

“Circle”

Stack your 5 and your 1, with 3 (best scorer) and 2 (or 1) standing on opposite sides of the fence/stack.

3 breaks in front of the fence, using it as a screen, 2 breaks behind, as the safety option.

Hit 3 going to basket, if he’s not open, can throw to 1 in backcourt.

Once 2 and 3 finish their “circle”. 5 backpedals deep as a “throw it up high” option and 1 breaks towards ball as option to pass in and then hand it off to 4.

Preferred outcome: Layup to 3.
Alternatives: Backcourt to 2, short pass to 1, high pass to 5.

Once teams scout it, can simply reverse the direction of the circle or have them “fake” the normal circle and reverse it.

View attachment 38610

And just to have a second play. Here’s slide. Get a double screen to your best scorer and then clear out for a kick-out 3. Both the screeners pop out as safety valve options if the primary option isn’t open.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7170.jpeg
    IMG_7170.jpeg
    607.8 KB · Views: 135
#117      
Two B1G wins, we will come back home and take on Penn State. Well we learned that even if a kid is not in the starting lineup (like DJ Davis) we can’t let up on our defense.
 
#118      
I thought KJ was great on Davis...
I agree- it’s ironic because side wouldn’t have put KJ on a smaller, quicker guard but it worked - it may have also been “ nobody else has stopped him” kind of approach

Felt just like Northwestern- but to have KJ be clutch down the stretch after a couple of brutal late games against NU and Tenn- good for the confidence of the whole team, Tre and Bos coming through big time as well at the end
 
#120      
we shot 19% from 3. 19%. and still finished 47% from the field and scored over 80pts on the road.

this team is a problem.

I liked Ben backing down and playing more physical today; 6 rebounds is a nice counting stat for him too.

feels like the rotation is settling in a bit more; I like the up tick in MJ and DGL; would love to see more of them.
Love that we got the W when the threes weren't falling. Can't expect to go 16/29 from three every night. You have to find other ways to score and we did work in the paint today.
 
#122      
Well, we scored 81 points (not indicative of a let down), we were up 17 in the first half (not indicative of a let down), we led by 11 at half time (not indicative of a let down), we overcame a guy who hit a zillion threes even though he's, what, sub-35% on the year (not indicative of a let down), and we showed real poise down the stretch with some clutch buckets, made free throws, and winning plays on defense (not indicative of a let down).

We did shoot poorly from three (not indicative of a let down), and made a bone-headed inbounds pass... was that the thing that was indicative of a let down?
Thanks for your thesis, but by let down I mean being up 17 and letting an inferior team come back and almost win the game.
 
#123      
Always some goof having a career night. Seems to happen to Illinois a lot thru the years.
Yep. And we still won, despite so many of our 3's just not falling. That's the game that even great teams lose.
 
#124      
I may be in the minority here but I absolutely loved what I saw today. Some amongst our fan base think every game should turn out like the Oregon game. I saw perseverance, composure, and resiliency today on the second game of a west coast road trip. Sooo many Illini teams in the past would have folded in this situation
 
#125      
Pretty much like I expected. Much more of a half court game.

Glad we won on a cold shooting night.

Thought we started out great on defense, but they made some adjustments and we never countered. That's concerning to me. Gotta change things up when needed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back