Kerr Kiisa
edit: guess i'm too dumb to post a gif. sentiment remains.
Kerr Kiisa
If Wil is at all possible you make it happen. Kid can be a player of the year candidate.It's a money thing - Will returning means mid 2 mil hit to our line. Sarr is high 1s, borderline 2 with Duke pushing for him. Tomi & Kylan will command 7 figures as well. Just not enough to fill out a roster unfortunately.
We are deep but not Arkansas, IU, Kansas deep.
Not really. Generally, our fan base wishes them well. The exception is when they or their handlers / family feel a need to trash the program on the way out.So many are so sure that Morez will never be a shooter, but his senior year he made 17 of 50 3 point shots in 34 games. It's not quite the stretch to see more to his game than just a rebounder and garbage guy. But, trashing anyone that leaves seems to be the standard.
Sharpshot complimenting Indy? Nice, nice. I appreciate Sharpshot stepping in while Lville and Il0440 are taking a breather.100% spot on with this one Indy.
Storr would be the bargain of the 2025 portal...when comparing upside vs. cost.
I'd take him.
If you give Storr the TSJ playbook, and ask, just how bad do you want this?100% spot on with this one Indy.
Storr would be the bargain of the 2025 portal...when comparing upside vs. cost.
I'd take him.
Wouldn’t waste a dime on him…..don’t need the empty 15 ppg in my opinion.100% spot on with this one Indy.
Storr would be the bargain of the 2025 portal...when comparing upside vs. cost.
I'd take him.
you don't need both Sarr and Will. One will do but Will's option one A. Will be your best player, possibly All Big 10.It's a money thing - Will returning means mid 2 mil hit to our line. Sarr is high 1s, borderline 2 with Duke pushing for him. Tomi & Kylan will command 7 figures as well. Just not enough to fill out a roster unfortunately.
We are deep but not Arkansas, IU, Kansas deep.
noKerr Kiisa in the portal….any interest? Thought I remember his name being floated around last time he transferred.
Yeah it’s interesting, especially if we get Will back. Will could be our Marcus in the half court. Not necessarily booty ball but play making and shot creating. And Storr we don’t really run anything for we just outlet rebounds to him and let him go.If you give Storr the TSJ playbook, and ask, just how bad do you want this?
Not only that, but calling a kid who:Maybe we shouldn't spend time using stupid nicknames for people who have done nothing but work hard for our program? Ben didn't decide his minutes. Ben took the shots he was supposed to take. They didn't fall as much as anyone wanted(definitely including him). But guess what? He's still here as of today. White and Johnson are gone. They had no loyalty to the program.. If you want to criticize them ok. If you want to be mad that Underwood played the guy too much that makes sense. But to take jabs at a guy who will hopefully return to give us some continuity next year shows what type of fanbase we have become. Its embarrassing.
deciding if next years uni's are gonna be script or throwbacks.......
Could we swing Kylan/Tomi/Storr/ Riley or Sarr/ Transfer 4It's a money thing - Will returning means mid 2 mil hit to our line. Sarr is high 1s, borderline 2 with Duke pushing for him. Tomi & Kylan will command 7 figures as well. Just not enough to fill out a roster unfortunately.
We are deep but not Arkansas, IU, Kansas deep.
Based on last season, not that bad.If you give Storr the TSJ playbook, and ask, just how bad do you want this?
Could we swing Kylan/Tomi/Storr/ Riley or Sarr/ Transfer 4
What's the number for AJ Storr who was extremely dominant in B10 tourney just a few years ago? If KU scheme was the issue then what's the number?
I mean, it's light-years better than last season! I'd obviously rather have more, but two for-sure starters than can impact a game is a good start in the Brad Underwood portal era. Maybe I should have qualified my statement a little more.I would disagree that retaining 2 players on a team graduating 0 meaningful contributors is a good start.
Returning 0-1 players is not some benchmark, where returning 2 makes for a good start. Only retaining 2 of potentially 6-8 guys is a very bad start to an off-season. Retaining less than 20% of your roster in consecutive years with no changes at the top, is a degree of turnover not standard in any era of basketball, including this one.
Did he get McDonalds there too?View attachment 41051
So apparently Dix doesn't necessarily have an issue with Owen Freeman (or he's simply using Creighton as leverage in his NIL negotiations).
Sooooo….where do we stand with Storr?!They’re familiar with each other …
Speaking of Storr … If the number I’ve heard he is after is true … I’d consider it …