I live close to Provo. I can vouch for that. It was all over the local media
Disagree. If they worked hard for the money it likely means more to them than if they didn’t. There’s not a direct correlation between wealth and frivolous spending.People have trouble wrapping their head around inflation when it comes to large numbers. Some stuff at McDonald's has doubled in price (or more) over the past few years. Why shouldn't recruits cost twice as much?
Or put another way- $1 million to a billionaire is $1,000 to a millionaire. You just have to consider the net worth of the donor class to understand how little this money means to them.
It's not frivolous spending, it's "treat yourself" money. Some people save to afford sports tickets, others save to afford sports teams. I'd argue paying to get your team to the Final Four is far less frivolous than paying to see them there, even though the former takes a lot more money.Disagree. If they worked hard for the money it likely means more to them than if they didn’t. There’s not a direct correlation between wealth and frivolous spending.
Sounds like both freshman redshirt...The money has gotten bigger, even from a year ago when people here were wondering if Christie might come.
At the same time, it's a huge risk for a kid to not enter the portal under those circumstances. Whatever money we have to bring him back is also available for another top talent.
Let's say that Riley tells the staff that he'd consider coming back for 2.5 but wants to wait until closer to the withdrawal date. Let's also say that Sarr tells them tomorrow that he'll come for 2.5. What does the staff do? Take Sarr I assume. Now Riley is homeless if he drops out.
If I had to guess it would be more about the amount of years they have played pro ball. Petrovic has played more than Tomi which is why I was expecting him to be listed as a Junior as the best case scenario
There is next to no chance Petrovic will have more than 1 year of eligibility
your missing the point completely. the Will money is available for no other player not named Will. it is separate $$ aside that will be allocated to no one but him if he wishes to come back.Well, of course. But the point remains that the Will money would be available for another player as we watch this all play out.
it's actually the opposite. should be a coaches dream to have the donors willing to sell out at the utmost necessity. you build your team with the thought he isn't coming back (which we have done) and then just in case he is, "hey, here's your potential All American."No, teams don't operate under a "strict cap" but they operate under a practical cap.
And there is no benefit to us for holding a money aside for a particular player. That puts our roster construction under the power of the player.
But I like how we've now progressed from "I wonder if there's a chance to get Will back" to "We can afford both Sarr and Will." At which point we add in Boogie Fland and start using A1 to generate fun Magnificent 7 memes.
Please post McDonald's pricing on here. I really want to dig into that material.People have trouble wrapping their head around inflation when it comes to large numbers. Some stuff at McDonald's has doubled in price (or more) over the past few years. Why shouldn't recruits cost twice as much?
Or put another way- $1 million to a billionaire is $1,000 to a millionaire. You just have to consider the net worth of the donor class to understand how little this money means to them.
Not if a donor says "I'll give you this but only for Riley."