Mark Smith transferring to Missouri

#102      
Mark Smith did not workout for us and I was underwhelmed by his athleticism. He is free to play where he wishes. We are free to boo him. We should refrain from being derogatory toward him and his family. Cuonzo can't be that terrible. He has been hired four times at the major college level. We would like him a lot better if he was our coach, assuming he would not get ys in trouble with our friends at the NCAA.
 
#103      

Deleted member 380722

D
Guest
Slightly off topic but Garrick McGee was just hired by Mizzou. Lol.
 
#104      
Mark Smith was promised a lot when recruiting by then newly hired coach.."We will build a system around him" . Current hype recruit several times mentioned how hard Mark Smith was recruiting him.

Not just yelling but pulling out players after 30 seconds of play for making a mistake is not the best way to learn the system. Several kids left BU and there is a reason for that.

As much as I hate Misery, all the best for Mark Smith - I am confident he will play at the next level.
 
#106      
8 ppg on 56% shooting and 4 rpg in 19.5 mpg, for a true freshman big in a major conference is a flop?

Which of our non LB bigs would you have not traded for that stat line last year?

Pretty sure those major conference stats you quoted came against non major competition... once season started... minutes disappeared
 
#107      
Mark Smith was promised a lot when recruiting by then newly hired coach.."We will build a system around him" . Current hype recruit several times mentioned how hard Mark Smith was recruiting him.

Not just yelling but pulling out players after 30 seconds of play for making a mistake is not the best way to learn the system. Several kids left BU and there is a reason for that.

As much as I hate Misery, all the best for Mark Smith - I am confident he will play at the next level.

what about when they get beat backdoor 1000000000000 times in one game for alleys?

Gotta be in the game to get beat backdoor like that.
 
#108      


I wouldn’t be 100%surprised if he ended up switching to baseball during his time at Missouri That’s not a knock on him either.

I'm curious why people believe Smith is any type of baseball prospect at this time when he's basically not played that sport for at least 2 years.
 
#109      
Mark Smith was promised a lot when recruiting by then newly hired coach.."We will build a system around him" . Current hype recruit several times mentioned how hard Mark Smith was recruiting him.

Not just yelling but pulling out players after 30 seconds of play for making a mistake is not the best way to learn the system. Several kids left BU and there is a reason for that.

As much as I hate Misery, all the best for Mark Smith - I am confident he will play at the next level.


If you mean, he will play in the NBA, I'll gladly take that bet.
 
#110      

IlliniCyborg

Edwardsville, IL
Nice post Hummus. The Mark Smith recruitment began in January from Cuonzo's people. This is not a surprise and follows the timeline of when he began meddling with Tyler Cook. He has also has not been the most compliant of coaches when it comes to Liddell either. Cuonzo doesn't believe the NCAA dead periods apply to him.
 
#111      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/coll...cle_e37cc74d-bbd1-5af5-b0ae-f1e5daaf034f.html

“I feel like (Martin) has my best interests in mind and we just have a very good relationship,” Smith said in a phone interview Sunday. “I like the fact that it’s a family atmosphere and he really wants what’s best for me. And I like their style of play.”

“He was bounced around a little bit from the one (point guard) to the two (shooting guard) to the three (wing) and it seemed like he played more of the three,” Yvonne Smith said. “I can only just stress it wasn’t the right system for him. That’s all I’m going to say.”

(sure would like to hear what BU privately thinks of the parents and MS' ability to play the point )

MS was lost in B1G play...a step slow and poor shooting %,,,terrible defense and prone to fouling....

I'm very happy with the trade of MS for any of the new recruits.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#112      
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/coll...cle_e37cc74d-bbd1-5af5-b0ae-f1e5daaf034f.html

“I feel like (Martin) has my best interests in mind and we just have a very good relationship,” Smith said in a phone interview Sunday. “I like the fact that it’s a family atmosphere and he really wants what’s best for me. And I like their style of play.”

“He was bounced around a little bit from the one (point guard) to the two (shooting guard) to the three (wing) and it seemed like he played more of the three,” Yvonne Smith said. “I can only just stress it wasn’t the right system for him. That’s all I’m going to say.”

(sure would like to hear what BU privately thinks of the parents and MS' ability to play the point )

MS was lost in B1G play...a step slow and poor shooting %,,,terrible defense and prone to fouling....

I'm very happy with the trade of MS for any of the new recruits.
MS: "I wish them the best of luck with Coach Underwood and the staff. I know he's going to sign players that fit his system. They're going to do great in the future. "

I wish MS the very best and a shot at playing pro somewhere. I think an off year to work on his fundamentals will be great for him.


Sent from my VS500 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#113      

Deleted member 631370

D
Guest
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/coll...cle_e37cc74d-bbd1-5af5-b0ae-f1e5daaf034f.html

“I feel like (Martin) has my best interests in mind and we just have a very good relationship,” Smith said in a phone interview Sunday. “I like the fact that it’s a family atmosphere and he really wants what’s best for me. And I like their style of play.”

“He was bounced around a little bit from the one (point guard) to the two (shooting guard) to the three (wing) and it seemed like he played more of the three,” Yvonne Smith said. “I can only just stress it wasn’t the right system for him. That’s all I’m going to say.”

(sure would like to hear what BU privately thinks of the parents and MS' ability to play the point )

MS was lost in B1G play...a step slow and poor shooting %,,,terrible defense and prone to fouling....

I'm very happy with the trade of MS for any of the new recruits.


I hope it works out for Mark Smith, and he lives his dream.

But man.....he's a long, long way to go from being a high-major PG. Blame the system all you want, but he and those close to him need to honestly evaluate his own ability to play the PG -- and do what's necessary to get him to where he needs to be.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#114      
I hope it works out for Mark Smith, and he lives his dream.

But man.....he's a long, long way to go from being a high-major PG. Blame the system all you want, but he and those close to him need to honestly evaluate his own ability to play the PG -- and do what's necessary to get him to where he needs to be.
I agree... I think he lived with a power game in the past and really didnt develop speed and quickness to be a lead PG. unlike some, I do believe quickness can be developed or at least enhanced. Watching ML quickness from his Illini days to his NBA time (albeit jusspot minutes)is an example... big enhancement for him since getting to league.

Sent from my VS500 using Tapatalk
 
#115      

Deleted member 29907

D
Guest
http://www.stltoday.com/sports/coll...cle_e37cc74d-bbd1-5af5-b0ae-f1e5daaf034f.html

“I feel like (Martin) has my best interests in mind and we just have a very good relationship,” Smith said in a phone interview Sunday. “I like the fact that it’s a family atmosphere and he really wants what’s best for me. And I like their style of play.”

“He was bounced around a little bit from the one (point guard) to the two (shooting guard) to the three (wing) and it seemed like he played more of the three,” Yvonne Smith said. “I can only just stress it wasn’t the right system for him. That’s all I’m going to say.”

(sure would like to hear what BU privately thinks of the parents and MS' ability to play the point )

MS was lost in B1G play...a step slow and poor shooting %,,,terrible defense and prone to fouling....

I'm very happy with the trade of MS for any of the new recruits.

This is code for "We miss nice, soft-guy JG". Seriously, the comment about "That's all I'm going to say" should have been left unsaid as BU has respectfully held his tongue. MS needs to develop not only his quickness, but toughness against good players - something not playing AAU was not exposed. And playing 1,2,3? Yes, BU gave him every chance to play - he was given his chance. Helicopter parenting is pretty evident here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#116      

Deleted member 631370

D
Guest
This is code for "We miss nice, soft-guy JG". Seriously, the comment about "That's all I'm going to say" should have been left unsaid as BU has respectfully held his tongue. MS needs to develop not only his quickness, but toughness against good players - something not playing AAU was not exposed. And playing 1,2,3? Yes, BU gave him every chance to play - he was given his chance. Helicopter parenting is pretty evident here.


I completely understand his/their desire to play the PG position. But don't blame "the system" because Mark was not ready to play that position at the college level.

"The system" isn't what relegated Mark to the 2/3 position -- and eventually the bench. Trent Frazier being 100 times better at the PG position is what relegated Smith to the 2/3. And frankly, Smith should be grateful that the staff give him as many minutes and opportunities as they did. His stat line in conference play doesn't need to be repeated here, but it was evident that as competition level went up, Smith simply could not compete with consistency.

I feel as though I spent half the season refuting the argument that "Smith's #s are similar to Deron and DMac and Luther and other freshman guards!". Those guys got noticeably better as the season went on, and their Big Ten #s were better than their non-conference #s. Smith was just the opposite. So, did "the system" suddenly change mid-season? Or rather, did the step up in competition expose the fact that Smith still needs a lot of work to compete at this level?

Pretty clear it's the latter. And don't blame "the system" for that.......unless, of course, you're looking for a system that relies on a slow PG who lacks lateral quickness and can't guard opposing PGs. In that case, yes.....our system wasn't suited for him.
 
#117      

Joel Goodson

respect my decision™
I completely understand his/their desire to play the PG position. But don't blame "the system" because Mark was not ready to play that position at the college level.

"The system" isn't what relegated Mark to the 2/3 position -- and eventually the bench. Trent Frazier being 100 times better at the PG position is what relegated Smith to the 2/3. And frankly, Smith should be grateful that the staff give him as many minutes and opportunities as they did. His stat line in conference play doesn't need to be repeated here, but it was evident that as competition level went up, Smith simply could not compete with consistency.

I feel as though I spent half the season refuting the argument that "Smith's #s are similar to Deron and DMac and Luther and other freshman guards!". Those guys got noticeably better as the season went on, and their Big Ten #s were better than their non-conference #s. Smith was just the opposite. So, did "the system" suddenly change mid-season? Or rather, did the step up in competition expose the fact that Smith still needs a lot of work to compete at this level?

Pretty clear it's the latter. And don't blame "the system" for that.......unless, of course, you're looking for a system that relies on a slow PG who lacks lateral quickness and can't guard opposing PGs. In that case, yes.....our system wasn't suited for him.

game, set, match!
 
#118      

Deleted member 29907

D
Guest
I completely understand his/their desire to play the PG position. But don't blame "the system" because Mark was not ready to play that position at the college level.

"The system" isn't what relegated Mark to the 2/3 position -- and eventually the bench. Trent Frazier being 100 times better at the PG position is what relegated Smith to the 2/3. And frankly, Smith should be grateful that the staff give him as many minutes and opportunities as they did. His stat line in conference play doesn't need to be repeated here, but it was evident that as competition level went up, Smith simply could not compete with consistency.

I feel as though I spent half the season refuting the argument that "Smith's #s are similar to Deron and DMac and Luther and other freshman guards!". Those guys got noticeably better as the season went on, and their Big Ten #s were better than their non-conference #s. Smith was just the opposite. So, did "the system" suddenly change mid-season? Or rather, did the step up in competition expose the fact that Smith still needs a lot of work to compete at this level?

Pretty clear it's the latter. And don't blame "the system" for that.......unless, of course, you're looking for a system that relies on a slow PG who lacks lateral quickness and can't guard opposing PGs. In that case, yes.....our system wasn't suited for him.

He clearly wasn't suited for a system of tough, quick on ball defense. Packline will be better for him but he still needs to develop BBIQ - e.g. don't take the ball into 7 footers and expect to dunk on them.
 
#119      
I completely understand his/their desire to play the PG position. But don't blame "the system" because Mark was not ready to play that position at the college level.

"The system" isn't what relegated Mark to the 2/3 position -- and eventually the bench. Trent Frazier being 100 times better at the PG position is what relegated Smith to the 2/3. And frankly, Smith should be grateful that the staff give him as many minutes and opportunities as they did. His stat line in conference play doesn't need to be repeated here, but it was evident that as competition level went up, Smith simply could not compete with consistency.

I feel as though I spent half the season refuting the argument that "Smith's #s are similar to Deron and DMac and Luther and other freshman guards!". Those guys got noticeably better as the season went on, and their Big Ten #s were better than their non-conference #s. Smith was just the opposite. So, did "the system" suddenly change mid-season? Or rather, did the step up in competition expose the fact that Smith still needs a lot of work to compete at this level?

Pretty clear it's the latter. And don't blame "the system" for that.......unless, of course, you're looking for a system that relies on a slow PG who lacks lateral quickness and can't guard opposing PGs. In that case, yes.....our system wasn't suited for him.

Zingy... and hard to argue with.
 
#121      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky
MS now plays for a rival that we will play every year for the near future...what he REALLY has to say about BU and the Illini is what concerns me the most, along with his parents.....

Its been alluded that his parents, i.e. father were problematic at times and I have no link , just going on a feeble 66 yr old memory, but he could really damage the Illini program with remarks detrimental such as BU too tough or I didn't get a chance at PG , etc etc....

I still say Im glad with the trade off of MS for any of the new recruits...MS has a longgggg way to go to be ready for D 1 high major play at any position....always a step slow on D and lazily fouled to make up for it....shot poorly from all areas of the court and tried to bull rush the basket continually with minimal success...
 
#122      
MS now plays for a rival that we will play every year for the near future...what he REALLY has to say about BU and the Illini is what concerns me the most, along with his parents.....

Its been alluded that his parents, i.e. father were problematic at times and I have no link , just going on a feeble 66 yr old memory, but he could really damage the Illini program with remarks detrimental such as BU too tough or I didn't get a chance at PG , etc etc....

I still say Im glad with the trade off of MS for any of the new recruits...MS has a longgggg way to go to be ready for D 1 high major play at any position....always a step slow on D and lazily fouled to make up for it....shot poorly from all areas of the court and tried to bull rush the basket continually with minimal success...



If programs actually got damaged from players complaining about coaches, nobody would play for them. That obviously isn’t the case. I’m not worried one bit about what his parents have to say unless Underwood went Bobby Knight on him and choked him or something crazy...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#123      
If programs actually got damaged from players complaining about coaches, nobody would play for them. That obviously isn’t the case. I’m not worried one bit about what his parents have to say unless Underwood went Bobby Knight on him and choked him or something crazy...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Edit: I meant parents complaining about coaches


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
#124      

pruman91

Paducah, Ky
If programs actually got damaged from players complaining about coaches, nobody would play for them. That obviously isn’t the case. I’m not worried one bit about what his parents have to say unless Underwood went Bobby Knight on him and choked him or something crazy...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

with the social media connections now it would seem to be possible that remarks could be used against us ,whether true or not....I have read that remarks on forum boards could disrupt recruiting plans, so it seems a former player could hold more contempt and bigger risk than us fans....

jmho
 
#125      
Actually, that is not true. Luther in conference was 4.1ppg/1.2apg and overall as a freshman was 4.5ppg/1.9apg so his non-conference was even better (to still maintain higher overall numbers). Dee was the same, in conference was 11.2ppg/4.8apg and overall 12ppg/5apg. Deron dropped more than 1ppg in conference (from 6.3ppg to 5.3ppg) but had a very slight increase in assists (from 4.5apg to 4.8apg).

But while their conference numbers dropped, none had the performance decline of Mark Smith. I think Mark Smith is a good character kid, just that he does not have the quickness (especially lateral quickness) to be an effective PG. But if he works at it, he could be an effective SG in college. Good luck to him.

I was surprised by how slow he was, especially laterally. He's a power guard with his current frame but I think he'd be better off becoming more lean. He still has potential to be a good player at the high major level.