My eyes are fine. You seem to have taken offense and written a rambling defense of your argument. I graduated in 89. I played in a couple of pickup games with several from the team (Nick, Gill, Bardo, Smith) including one featuring a Nick vs. Mitchel Wiggins battle.
None of that has any bearing on my contention that the ‘89 team had an alpha factor that allowed them to beat top level teams even
when the shots weren’t falling. You could feel (and see) it with the ‘89 team if you were there. They were downright intimidating. This team hasn’t shown that yet.
Mirk has the attitude (in spades!), but lacks the athleticism to impose his will. Keaton has that calm confidence. Boswell can be a dog when he locks in. For the rest, I’m not so sure. They all seem to have a high IQ. They like each other. They have fun. Can they get nasty on the defensive end or will the narrative be “it wasn’t our night” when the shots aren’t falling?
Again, I love this team and how it’s constructed. I love their personalities…likable guys. But
will they impose their will in a game in which the shots are not falling? That’s what is needed to win a championship because *at least* one game in the tournament will feel like there’s a lid on the basket. That’s what I want for them and for us fans. I’m pretty sure that’s what they want.
I worry that this team’s offensive potential *can* route them, in the heat of the battle, into a belief that they will win by scoring more…even when the shots aren’t falling. If they don’t develop that alpha attitude on the defensive end, their tourney success can be easily upended in any round when the shots aren’t falling.
And I’ll say it again…I love this mf’ng team!!!
