Texas coach Chris Beard arrested

Status
Not open for further replies.
#151      
Is Texas a “big time program” in a way Illinois isn’t? Because they have a lot of football money? Are we worried about Notre Dame and Alabama taking Brad, too??

He ain’t goin’ nowhere. 😎
Honestly the basketball first (in their work/personal lives) people I know, are still Texas football first in their fandom.

It is literally the exact opposite of what Illinois has been. Football season gets us to basketball season.

Down here, basketball gets them to spring football. I went to a UNC/UT game a few years ago. Half empty stadium and no atmosphere at all. Thought I was watching golf. Could you imagine UNC going to any school that cared even a little bit about basketball? Wouldn’t be an open seat anywhere and the crowd wouldn’t be sitting on their hands, that’s for sure.

That said, I’ve heard the new stadium is better for the student section, but I’ve been there for a concert, and overall, I was not overly impressed. Seats were super uncomfortable and cramped. There was a good amount of places for donors, like many places have, but they usually aren’t bringing the energy.

The practice facility leaves a bit to be desired as well. Obviously ours is brand new now and should be better, and it is. But even compared to the old ubben, UT was even with it at best.
 
#154      

NEIlliniFan

No longer in New England
Better translation: Domestic violence and abuse is extremely complex. Many of those abused later retract their statements. Battered wife/Partner Syndrome which, by the away, doesn't translate to "She's an opportunistic gold digger".
 
#156      

sbillini

st petersburg, fl
It makes it hard for UT. You have the horrendous police report but then you have the victim saying it didn’t happen. I am not sure how UT handles this
I would think the police observations and her statements at the scene carry more weight than her decisions afterwards.

But yes, from a purely legal standpoint, her retracting statements probably make it difficult to prosecute.
 
#157      
I would think the police observations and her statements at the scene carry more weight than her decisions afterwards.

But yes, from a purely legal standpoint, her retracting statements probably make it difficult to prosecute.
The standard of employment as an NCAA basketball coach and the standard of conviction in criminal court are two entirely different things. There is plenty of evidence showing that no halfway decent basketball program should hire this guy.
 
#158      

sbillini

st petersburg, fl
The standard of employment as an NCAA basketball coach and the standard of conviction in criminal court are two entirely different things. There is plenty of evidence showing that no halfway decent basketball program should hire this guy.
I never said otherwise. But it’s Texas. My only point was the legal system likely won’t decide for them, so the boosters will decide for themselves. And who knows how that decision plays out.
 
#159      
I never said otherwise. But it’s Texas. My only point was the legal system likely won’t decide for them, so the boosters will decide for themselves. And who knows how that decision plays out.

Can they fire him for cause if there is no legal action taken against him and the statements were retracted by the victim?
 
#160      

sbillini

st petersburg, fl
Can they fire him for cause if there is no legal action taken against him and the statements were retracted by the victim?

I’m guessing that depends on how the contract is worded. I know in some CEO contracts being indicted is enough to fire for cause. but if there’s no indictment, I think beard would have a case to sue if they try to fire him for cause.

Overall I don’t think it ever gets there though. If beard does get axed, I think they pay him to leave (if they want him to leave at all) if the legal process doesn’t go further than it has.
 
#161      
I’m guessing that depends on how the contract is worded. I know in some CEO contracts being indicted is enough to fire for cause. but if there’s no indictment, I think beard would have a case to sue if they try to fire him for cause.

Overall I don’t think it ever gets there though. If beard does get axed, I think they pay him to leave (if they want him to leave at all) if the legal process doesn’t go further than it has.
I think the police report is enough to get him fired for cause. I think the retraction is enough for him to get some sort of severance to avoid a legal battle.
 
#162      
Better translation: Domestic violence and abuse is extremely complex. Many of those abused later retract their statements. Battered wife/Partner Syndrome which, by the away, doesn't translate to "She's an opportunistic gold digger".
Very well said. Its complicated and until you've been there yourself or have someone close to you go through it, you can't understand it. But you can have some compassion for others.
 
#163      
I pointed out that you can not pledge allegiance to 2 different things because that’s not how allegiance works by definition.
Umm...do you have a religion?...You might not call it “allegiance” but for Christ’s sake.... 🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
#164      
I think the police report is enough to get him fired for cause. I think the retraction is enough for him to get some sort of severance to avoid a legal battle.
Yeah, pretty sure this is the right answer.

Not sure what Texas will do though. Maybe suspension with mandatory completion of counseling over a set time frame.
 
#166      
I would say he's next in line to take over at Michigan when Howard leaves for he NBA.
Or to jail for assault

Sexual Assault GIF
 
#167      
I doubt that her retraction will necessarily cause the legal problems to go away. If the police saw clear evidence of a crime, the DA should still prosecute.
 
#168      
I doubt that her retraction will necessarily cause the legal problems to go away. If the police saw clear evidence of a crime, the DA should still prosecute.
I really wish that were so, but I can see the DA viewing the case as too difficult to win with the survivor of the assault ready to testify against the prosecution. I'm as big a fan of poetic justice as any, but I can't see it happening here. The only consequence Beard is likely to experience as a result of being absolute scum is that people far and wide will know what a piece of carp he is. Hopefully he winds up experiencing some ostracism from others if not from his wife just yet.
 
#170      
We have lots of examples of the law getting the facts wrong. Lord knows I have seen it first hand.
 
#172      
No, why do you ask?

I mean, if you have to ask….

Let’s just say the gap between what should happen and what usually happens when wealthy, powerful people are involved is pretty darn wide.
 
#173      
I mean, if you have to ask….

Let’s just say the gap between what should happen and what usually happens when wealthy, powerful people are involved is pretty darn wide.
It is. But it's also a different world than it was a decade ago. Not many people more powerful than Harvey Weinstein, as an example.

I don't have a sense of what exactly might happen in a place like Austin when power meets progress.
 
#174      

SKane

Tennessee
A lawyer's favorite question - were you lying then or are you lying now?

Was she lying when she telephoned the police (doubtful - given the police report referencing the physical injuries). It is difficult to bite yourself on the arm, etc.

Or she is lying now to protect a bad guy? Much more likely Maybe they worked out a deal for him to give her money in return for retracting the allegation before a criminal case was filed.
 
#175      
A
A lawyer's favorite question - were you lying then or are you lying now?

Was she lying when she telephoned the police (doubtful - given the police report referencing the physical injuries). It is difficult to bite yourself on the arm, etc.

Or she is lying now to protect a bad guy? Much more likely Maybe they worked out a deal for him to give her money in return for retracting the allegation before a criminal case was filed.
A lawyer never asks that question. Just get the witness to admit they told two conflicting stories, and let the jury draw the obvious conclusion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.