micahmccoy
M
Guest
I'll be running in my new "Secondary" logo dri-fit tee tomorrow. I'm fully expecting to get booed and jeered along the way.
I'll be running in my new "Secondary" logo dri-fit tee tomorrow. I'm fully expecting to get booed and jeered along the way.



I'll be running in my new "Secondary" logo dri-fit tee tomorrow. I'm fully expecting to get booed and jeered along the way.
Can you make jerseys like you did that say Fighting Illini, but in cursive writing? I don't know if that's possible.
![]()
Are you thinking like a throwback kind of look?
Yes sir.
Yup, that's the one. I'm in love with it.
It's cool. I like the back too.
I'll see what I can do!
I'm smiling right now, man. The rebrand legitimately upsets me, but I wasn't seriously talking about it then. That was tongue-in-cheek as I said.

YOU DON'T SAY!![]()
No, just group psychology. If that logo had been presented by someone on this forum as an idea last week most on here would have ripped it as idiotic. But once it is OUR logo, then all the emotion swings in and most of the really rabid fans rally behind the team. Most on here would have supported anything Nike came up with. The same thing happens when someone buys a house. When they are looking at houses, there is a ton of criticism and doubt. But once they buy the house, most people develop an incredible emotional bond with their house, are convinced they made a great buy, and can't see the flaws.
By the way, maybe this has been discussed already, but I don't think it has.
Re: "Fighting Illini", everyone seemed surprised that that phrase was used pretty sparingly in the overall profile. But did you notice that just "Illini" was not used anywhere in any materials or on any uniforms? I don't believe that word was spoken on its own in the entire presentation either.
Seems to me, given that virtually all of the other whispers seem to have been legitimate rumors, that what was meant by emphasizing "Fighting Illini" was in fact the elimination of just "Illini" as something that would be used in official materials.
Hard to say for sure. There have been some god awful logos that have lasted for years. It all depends upon how persistent the DIA is on pushing this and how attached fans become to something awful because "we're loyal to Illinois".
Hopefully the DIA have the sense to make a graceful exit, perhaps turn it into a shield and kind of pretend the whole 2 Fs, dangly lines = columns thing never happened.
The fact that a collegiate rebrand can "legitimately upset" you is a bit weird.
Fantastic!
YOU DON'T SAY!![]()
homemade two-tone? #NotAnArtist
Just a guess (not that you guys can't mock it up for fun), but I doubt we'll ever see the two-tone on anything but ILLINOIS and FIGHTING ILLINI. I'm better that treatment is reserved only for the word marks, while the font itself will see use in other instances as well.
I love the way everybody preached consistency yet the football unis trace back to old times and the bball unis go back to the chief.
By the way, maybe this has been discussed already, but I don't think it has.
Re: "Fighting Illini", everyone seemed surprised that that phrase was used pretty sparingly in the overall profile. But did you notice that just "Illini" was not used anywhere in any materials or on any uniforms? I don't believe that word was spoken on its own in the entire presentation either.
Seems to me, given that virtually all of the other whispers seem to have been legitimate rumors, that what was meant by emphasizing "Fighting Illini" was in fact the elimination of just "Illini" as something that would be used in official materials.