The Illinois Football Coaching Search

Status
Not open for further replies.
#626      

altenberger22

South Carolina
Two things I want to add:

1) Thank you, Coach Smith. It didn't appear to be working out by my estimation - as in, I did not see us improving significantly over the next 2-3 years, and the recruits weren't there to buy more time - but I was genuinely proud to have you represent the Illin with such class and dignity.

2) I'm getting a little tired of people around the Internet who are LITERALLY ILLINI FANS downplaying this job. We have brand new facilities, good recruiting grounds, a world class university in a nationally renowned college town, a young and energetic AD who is by all accounts good to work for and no shortage of money or influential boosters willing to pony up for a coach they believe in. We simply should not be this bad year in and year out, and we cannot allow ourselves to be so beaten down so as to forget that. If a program like Iowa can go from utterly bad before Ferentz showed up (FROM MAINE) to what they are now or Wisconsin can go from a constant doormat to running the Big Ten West, we can at the VERY least strive for hardly ever missing a bowl. Instead, as someone noted, we haven't won 7+ games in a row hardly ever in decades. That is below what we should all expect from Illinois Football.

3) Things not working out with hire after hire after hire is NOT a reason to stop trying. You HAVE to try to get better. Period. If we hire a coach who starts going 7-5 every year for ten years and we achieve the goal I mentioned in Point #2 and fans are back on board and we have so momentum but nothing is improving? Guess what? We probably should move on and try to use the momentum to aim higher. The EVENTUAL goal at Illinois should be to compete for championships. Period. We obviously have to consider the situation and be realistic and afford realistic timetables (even if that is a decade or two!), but we can never stop striving toward those goals. If our own damn fans don't believe in our program's potential ... well, as someone else said, go root for 'Bama. I will never understand Illini fans who seem to pratcially enjoy talking about Illinois in a bad light. Whatever failure goes on for Illini athletics is quite simply fixable.
Nicely stated. However, it's Haden Fry -- not Ferentz. (Ferentz is just one of those guys who deserves no credit because he's simply maintaining a program that was built by his predecessor.)
 
#628      

lstewart53x3

Scottsdale, Arizona
Nicely stated. However, it's Haden Fry -- not Ferentz. (Ferentz is just one of those guys who deserves no credit because he's simply maintaining a program that was built by his predecessor.)
Building success is hard. Maintaining success is just as difficult.
 
#629      
I might have been at that game, but would have been 9 years old so have no recollection. I guess that's a good game to not remember.
I prefer to remember the game I attended that was Dan Marino vs. Tony Eason.
Two friends who flew with me to Pittsburgh for that game are no longer with us. But I will presume to speak for Bob Auler when I say without fear of contradiction that we were well served by that team and HC.
 
#630      

altenberger22

South Carolina
I liked the way that Robert Rosenthal laid it out on TV: "Illinois went with the NFL coach (2x), the recruiter, and the program builder* (asterisk for any coach hired by Mike Thomas)...nothing worked". So if we go down that theme, what other "category" is left. 1) Young Talented Coach 2) the redemption coach 3) the top school coach, but on their way out coach 4) Successful Power 5 coach already...any others?

Not that I think Josh thinks this way necessarily, but I think he would put his job in jeopardy if he chooses either the young talented coach or redemption coach. I don't think it necessarily means doom for him, but if it ends in scandal it could be a stain. However, I like the guy and think he does right by those he hires and the university, so I don't think he necessarily gets the Axe. I think the redemption coach is one that will give us the greatest chance to get and achieve success. No already Successful Power 5 coach gives us a serious look. I don't want someone who may be at risk because they aren't performing at their school...even if it is a top program and their expectations are crazy...my expectations are crazy too, so what makes me want that? The Young Coach is a tough one. On one hand, you have someone that is exciting, brings energy, could be a big hit...on the other, if it pans out, they will always be a flight risk, the chances of panning out are lower, and you need to develop a program/consistency...tough call.

I just hope whoever it is, we'll be excited about it just as we were with BU and Lovie TBH.
Robert was indeed really good on TV. I think that was probably his #1 video performance since I've started following him. Very much at ease; on point; knowledgeable; and, fact-based. It was a great discussion/interview!

With that said, he surprised me with Sarkisian. Thought he'd go with one of the 30-something youngsters since that's the one approach we've not yet taken as a program.
 
#631      

sacraig

The desert
A 38-26 record in a P5 conference is a stronger record than a lot of the other names being thrown out. Leipold is 36-32 at Buffalo, FYI.

But the trend is the wrong way. That record is heavily influenced by his first two years. In his 3rd year through now, he is 19-18. His conference record in that time is similar at 14-12. I mean, it's better than where we are at now, but he's working with a historically better program than we are.
 
#632      
A 38-26 record in a P5 conference is a stronger record than a lot of the other names being thrown out. Leipold is 36-32 at Buffalo, FYI.

Fuente was 19-8 his first two years, but has been 19-18 his last 3 years, including this year. Seems to have peaked/plateaued at VT.

Leipold was 13-23, his first 3 years. He's 23-9, his last 3 years, including this year.

Two very different trajectories. Both are vastly better than Illinois over the last 5-6 years.
 
#634      
I agree with 22’s post. If you look at Is, Wis, and Nw there is no reason why we are not in that group year in and out. No matter who comes in it will be I believe another rebuild. It shouldn’t take 5 years. When we played Iathis year I heard the announcer say it was interesting how many I’ll kids sre playing at IA.
 
#635      
I give you November 1979 and Gary Moeller departing having won four BT games in three seasons, and tying two. The Sept. 1978 scoreless tie in Memorial Stadium with eventually-winless Northwestern (0-10-1 that year, while we went 1-8-2) is reputed to have been the worst BT football game in decades. (Did anyone here actually see it?)


And then Mike White, who had coached Steve Bartowski and Chuck Munice as HC at Cal in the mid-'70s, came to town.

I was there, visiting my big brother. After the first quarter, we decamped to his fraternity's tailgate tent.
 
#636      

altenberger22

South Carolina
Wow. Had no idea he made that much. Was thinking around 1.5 but that's gotta be the highest coordinator salary in the country. That might take him out of the running. Not sure I see him as a fit at Auburn but obviously those other schools would offer higher salary and prestige.
Being in SC, I know that Brent Venables pulls-in $2.3M at Clemson. Quite sure that puts him in the top 5 for DC's.
 
#637      

altenberger22

South Carolina
I give you November 1979 and Gary Moeller departing having won four BT games in three seasons, and tying two. The Sept. 1978 scoreless tie in Memorial Stadium with eventually-winless Northwestern (0-10-1 that year, while we went 1-8-2) is reputed to have been the worst BT football game in decades. (Did anyone here actually see it?)


And then Mike White, who had coached Steve Bartowski and Chuck Munice as HC at Cal in the mid-'70s, came to town.
Hand goes up. Yes, I sat through every minute of that one with my Dad.
 
#638      

Deleted member 29907

D
Guest
Why would anything about his record scream that he'd be a good hire? VT has been mediocre.
VT fans not pleased with the Fuente results. He'd be an upgrade for us, but only slightly. Tends to lose games he should win and some interesting game management. He does (did) get some good athletes, but that's probably more the school rep lingering. His recruiting is sliding.

Patterson is in the portal if anyone is interested. The team has had some pretty bad COVID problems this year which begs the question of team control. Any one of their top 3 qbs would be a starter for us sadly.
 
#639      

altenberger22

South Carolina
And on the flip side of that awful 1978 scoreless tie with the Mildcats, here's something that might give us hope for the future. It was only five seasons later:

Awesome point! It took just (1) a dynamic new coach, and (2) a couple of years. Resulting in 70,000 screaming fans in the stands for multiple years in a row.
 
#640      
You can't see the difference in Ryan Day's resume compared to Bielema? The difference is Bielema left Wisconsin to take the Arkansas job and he was their worst non-interim coach since the late 1990's.

Illinois' program is much closer to Arkansas than Wisconsin (in fact, we are worse than Arkansas). Bielema failed at the job that was most similar to our current situation.
The gap between Arkansas and the blue bloods of the SEC West is far bigger than the gap between Illinois and the better teams of the Big 10 West. They aren’t even comparable.

There’s lot bigger gap between Arkansas and Alabama, than Illinois and Wisconsin
 
#642      
I liked the way that Robert Rosenthal laid it out on TV: "Illinois went with the NFL coach (2x), the recruiter, and the program builder* (asterisk for any coach hired by Mike Thomas)...nothing worked". So if we go down that theme, what other "category" is left. 1) Young Talented Coach 2) the redemption coach 3) the top school coach, but on their way out coach 4) Successful Power 5 coach already...any others?

Not that I think Josh thinks this way necessarily, but I think he would put his job in jeopardy if he chooses either the young talented coach or redemption coach. I don't think it necessarily means doom for him, but if it ends in scandal it could be a stain. However, I like the guy and think he does right by those he hires and the university, so I don't think he necessarily gets the Axe. I think the redemption coach is one that will give us the greatest chance to get and achieve success. No already Successful Power 5 coach gives us a serious look. I don't want someone who may be at risk because they aren't performing at their school...even if it is a top program and their expectations are crazy...my expectations are crazy too, so what makes me want that? The Young Coach is a tough one. On one hand, you have someone that is exciting, brings energy, could be a big hit...on the other, if it pans out, they will always be a flight risk, the chances of panning out are lower, and you need to develop a program/consistency...tough call.

I just hope whoever it is, we'll be excited about it just as we were with BU and Lovie TBH.
We went with an NFL coach in Mackovic and did awfully well. If Turner doesn't turn away Cutler or Rodgers he may very well have continued the success he had in 99 and 01. We also did well with a redemption coach in White. So you really can't base anything on Robert's criteria. There are good coaches in each of the above categories; we just have to find the right one.
 
#643      
I love following this thread, but my money's on JW hiring someone that has not been mentioned here.

I was told today by a source that we are looking at the wrong WR coach. Whitman reportedly is interested in another WR coach. He’s pretty young, a BIG time recruiter, has NFL experience.

I don’t know if this guy has been mentioned or not.. If so, I must have missed it. I’m sure some of you can figure out who it is by the info I gave...
 
#645      
I guess my point is - that if you go with boring (my opinion of course) you'd better guarantee wins or you'll have both sleepy and then angry fans. I went to a VaTech, GaTech games a few years back and i literally wanted to chew my leg off to get out of there. Ok, exaggeration, but boy was it a snooze fest when GaTech had the ball.

Monken is 40-36 at Army. No exactly world beating. I am not saying he couldn't adopt and run a different offense. I have no deep background on his ability. My objection is to the Triple O style of play. If we're going to change, let's get something exciting to watch. I never liked a slow down offense in bball either - give me the flyin' Illini style every day.

I actually think, due to the nature of the beast, you could get more wins with the triple o if executed very well than our previous 5 years effort just because it is tougher to stay disciplined to defend. But, I probably would fall asleep before the game was over and is a .500 season worth that? Is that success? There's a reason Boeheim runs a zone at SU - he counts on it getting him some wins in the tourney.
48-38 at Army
 
#646      

Ryllini

Lombard
I was told today by a source that we are looking at the wrong WR coach. Whitman reportedly is interested in another WR coach. He’s pretty young, a BIG time recruiter, has NFL experience.

I don’t know if this guy has been mentioned or not.. If so, I must have missed it. I’m sure some of you can figure out who it is by the info I gave...

Aaron Morehead?
 
#647      
I was told today by a source that we are looking at the wrong WR coach. Whitman reportedly is interested in another WR coach. He’s pretty young, a BIG time recruiter, has NFL experience.

I don’t know if this guy has been mentioned or not.. If so, I must have missed it. I’m sure some of you can figure out who it is by the info I gave...
Brian Hartline?
 
#648      

altenberger22

South Carolina
We went with an NFL coach in Mackovic and did awfully well. If Turner doesn't turn away Cutler or Rodgers he may very well have continued the success he had in 99 and 01. We also did well with a redemption coach in White. So you really can't base anything on Robert's criteria. There are good coaches in each of the above categories; we just have to find the right one.
To be fair, Robert acknowledged that White and Mackovic led our last sustained success --- where we pretty much had a "real football program" albeit for only 10 years. His comments pertained to everything that had occurred since Mackovic left 30 years ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.