TSJ Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#353      

BillyBob1

Champaign
I am fearful the BOT inserts themselves into the situation if it is granted. Hope I'm wrong as that would likely not be a positive development. This whole situation has sucked from the beginning. A total shame assuming TSJ is innocent, which I believe him to be.
BOT and the president are listed as to who the injunction would go to.
 
#354      
Post # 310. Am I wrong, or does it say that she could not identify him in a line up?
 
#355      

Joel Goodson

respect my decision™
I just read the sworn report filed on Twitter. I do have some legal background (20+ years) the facts listed in this case don’t come CLOSE to being probable cause to make an arrest. The detective even states in his report the 2 of them are not seen on camera together. There is no physical evidence listed to tie TJ as the perpetrator. The victim only was able to identify TJ after google searching for people and identifying him which would NEVER hold up in court. This is a he said she said with what I gather is NO evidence and again…would never have been charged in MY personal opinion. This is why people sometimes lose faith in our justice system. I feel so awful for TJ and I pray he gets justice and the courts here in Champaign county do the right thing and grant his motion Wednesday. I agree with his attorneys stance that this will cause irreparable damage if this continues. I for one think this motion will be granted Wednesday.

spot on. mega-sized crock of guano. unreal
 
#356      
Yes, it's physically possible.
It seems…insane to me. I could be reading it wrong, but the way it all reads to me is he has a woman in one arm, is in front of the alleged victim, reaches around the alleged victim (and almost certainly down due to TJs height) while still holding onto the other woman. He then probably has to bend down or lean into the alleged victim and if he is, he’s doing it while maintaining his arm around the other woman.

I just…idk. It seems incredibly unlikely.
 
#358      

illinifan31

Former Krush Cow
South Bend, IN
Does the video evidence not corroborate because there are no videos in that room but they show both TSJ and this woman entering and leaving at overlapping times? Or because there ARE videos in the room and they literally never show them interacting? Those are two very different things.
 
#362      
View attachment 30020

snip
View attachment 30019

Um. how the heck this does happen? TSJ had one arm another lady.. the other hand doing some type of magic lock picking without anyone noticing... It must be a super short skirt. In my limited experience, this is not easy...

I call BS on this otherwise, TSJ should be the next Harry Houdini!
One would think that a 6'6" person standing next to a local celebrity (KU player) would be incredibly conspicuous. And his height would make it more difficult to do what she claimed without anyone noticing.
 
#369      
Perhaps I missed it in the report, but the friend said she saw nothing. What I'm curious about is if she saw the 6'6" Shannon. Under the description, I guess I can understand her not seeing what happened. But "Did you notice a big black guy standing next to your friend?" seems like an obvious question.
 
#370      

IlliniKat91

Chicago, IL
It seems…insane to me. I could be reading it wrong, but the way it all reads to me is he has a woman in one arm, is in front of the alleged victim, reaches around the alleged victim (and almost certainly down due to TJs height) while still holding onto the other woman. He then probably has to bend down or lean into the alleged victim and if he is, he’s doing it while maintaining his arm around the other woman.

I just…idk. It seems incredibly unlikely.
You're assuming things about their positioning and her build. His wing span is long enough that it's possible for a woman that's of at least average height.
 
#372      
I am not clear on what probable cause / evidence exists to charge him based on what’s out there.
 
#375      

IlliniKat91

Chicago, IL
So is TJ saying it wasn’t him at all? Or is he saying she consented?
I think it's a carefully considered omission.

From what I read, it doesn't sound like there's any evidence (video, DNA, physical, or eyewitness) to say they were together. If I were in his shoes and there wasn't anything linking me to her, I wouldn't admit to anything either. It only muddies the waters for a jury if it goes to trial. It's a lot easier to pull a Shaggy and say, "She says it was me, but she had to do an internet search and there's no other evidence of me being near her. It wasn't me."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.