He was was him that night - they were hanging outThat would certainly make a lot of sense
He was was him that night - they were hanging outThat would certainly make a lot of sense
So is TJ saying it wasn’t him at all? Or is he saying she consented?
BOT and the president are listed as to who the injunction would go to.I am fearful the BOT inserts themselves into the situation if it is granted. Hope I'm wrong as that would likely not be a positive development. This whole situation has sucked from the beginning. A total shame assuming TSJ is innocent, which I believe him to be.
I just read the sworn report filed on Twitter. I do have some legal background (20+ years) the facts listed in this case don’t come CLOSE to being probable cause to make an arrest. The detective even states in his report the 2 of them are not seen on camera together. There is no physical evidence listed to tie TJ as the perpetrator. The victim only was able to identify TJ after google searching for people and identifying him which would NEVER hold up in court. This is a he said she said with what I gather is NO evidence and again…would never have been charged in MY personal opinion. This is why people sometimes lose faith in our justice system. I feel so awful for TJ and I pray he gets justice and the courts here in Champaign county do the right thing and grant his motion Wednesday. I agree with his attorneys stance that this will cause irreparable damage if this continues. I for one think this motion will be granted Wednesday.
It seems…insane to me. I could be reading it wrong, but the way it all reads to me is he has a woman in one arm, is in front of the alleged victim, reaches around the alleged victim (and almost certainly down due to TJs height) while still holding onto the other woman. He then probably has to bend down or lean into the alleged victim and if he is, he’s doing it while maintaining his arm around the other woman.Yes, it's physically possible.
BINGOIt is very possible (likely?) that people within UI support TSJ taking this route. We can't lose a PR battle if a court is the one deciding to let him play.
If he is legally available, of course you play him. Why would you even ask that, wtf.I understand from the TSJ perspective this would get him back on the team
However from a BU standpoint do u play him?
Also this could establish precedent for future cases
I started to ask this as well. I have no idea if Shannon was even involved in this and the argument could be made from the report that neither does the accuser, police, or DA.So is TJ saying it wasn’t him at all? Or is he saying she consented?
One would think that a 6'6" person standing next to a local celebrity (KU player) would be incredibly conspicuous. And his height would make it more difficult to do what she claimed without anyone noticing.View attachment 30020
snip
View attachment 30019
Um. how the heck this does happen? TSJ had one arm another lady.. the other hand doing some type of magic lock picking without anyone noticing... It must be a super short skirt. In my limited experience, this is not easy...
I call BS on this otherwise, TSJ should be the next Harry Houdini!
I'm curious of this. I want TSJ to be innocent, but this part Isnt clear to me.So is TJ saying it wasn’t him at all? Or is he saying she consented?
Sure, if you believe universities have no ability to enforce conduct policies."Against the UI".... I'm no law expert, but is this move an attempt to basically neuter the panel?
Could this actually work?
It's been over 40 years since I hung in a crowded college bar, but reading this, and giving her the benefit of the doubt, how does she know it was his hand???I need to know which hand she was claiming because her story could completely fall apart based on that.
Because of the optics. Its a fair question.If he is legally available, of course you play him. Why would you even ask that, wtf.
You're assuming things about their positioning and her build. His wing span is long enough that it's possible for a woman that's of at least average height.It seems…insane to me. I could be reading it wrong, but the way it all reads to me is he has a woman in one arm, is in front of the alleged victim, reaches around the alleged victim (and almost certainly down due to TJs height) while still holding onto the other woman. He then probably has to bend down or lean into the alleged victim and if he is, he’s doing it while maintaining his arm around the other woman.
I just…idk. It seems incredibly unlikely.
Because her lawyer said soIt's been over 40 years since I hung in a crowded college bar, but reading this, and giving her the benefit of the doubt, how does she know it was his hand???
I'm only on the third line and I see a gross grammatical error. Jeez, let the Kansas jokes begin
The whole thing is a mess - they state Friday September 7th. How about they get the dates right firstI'm only on the third line and I see a gross grammatical error. Jeez, let the Kansas jokes begin
I think it's a carefully considered omission.So is TJ saying it wasn’t him at all? Or is he saying she consented?