I've stated this before, but I believe it is worth repeating. As a woman who has been assaulted, I'm telling you for a fact that I could not have been a reliable witness to identify my attacker. Whether it was the alcohol, the trauma or my mind protecting me, there was no way I could have ID-ed my assailant with any certainty. My point is, based on my own experience, I don't see her as a completely reliable witness. She spent hours scrolling through the internet until she found someone who looked familar. The more she looked at the picture, the more convinced she was that it was TSJ. That's the way memory often works. According to studies done on wrongful convictions, more than half of them are based on bad eye witness testimony. From what we've seen and hard so far, the accuser's word seems to be the only real "evidence" the prosecution has in this case. If that turns out to be the case, to me, there is certainly reasonable doubt.