I’ll GLADLY be lectured by someone about how my opinions are problematic, but…
1) While there might be additional evidence yet to be revealed, I think it’s fair to judge TJ by ONLY those facts - even circumstantial - that we have available.
2) I’ll judge ALL of these (possibly circumstantial) facts with both the presumption of TJ’s innocence and the positive image he’s put forth to-date.
3) Until more becomes available … this case seems like a joke.
4) Believing #3 before we get “all the facts” isn’t just entirely reasonable, it should be the moral default for any man or woman accused of something that they adamantly deny.
5) #4 takes nothing away from A-N-Y other sexual assault case or any perceived broader problem regarding sexual assault. TJ and, frankly, the victim deserve this case to be viewed in isolation. If you see viewing it in isolation as a problem, I’d argue the problem lies more with you, your virtue signaling and your desire to make everything about a validation of your self-flattering ideologies that pad your ego…