Illinois Hoops Recruiting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
#151      

MDchicago

Lake Norman NC
If this is our lineup, we will scuffle mightily against any team that presses us. Even without a press the number of turnovers we're going to cough up would be ridiculous.

Hope it doesn't come to that, but if it does we'll be ready to scuffle!
Super Bowl Chiefs GIF by Pizza Hut
 
#152      
Just to inject a little positivity, the draft notes on TSJ indicate he has 3 main things he needs to improve:

1. Ballhandling
2. Perimeter shooting
3. Finishing with his right hand

I expect to see marked improvement in these areas, given that is what he needs to work on in order to get drafted. If he can improve the ballhandling even just a smidge, he could help out a ton in this one area that a lot of us feel we're sorely lacking. They did have him bring the ball up plenty last year and he wasn't dreadful at it. As much as he had the ball in his hands (which was a ton, probably nearly EVERY possession I would guess), he only had a 14% turnover rate. For comparison's sake, turnover rates for last season's Bob Cousy award finalists:

Markquis Nowell 19%
Tyler Kolek 18%
Boo Buie 13%
Jalen Pickett 13%
Yuri Collins 25%
 
#154      
Just to inject a little positivity, the draft notes on TSJ indicate he has 3 main things he needs to improve:

1. Ballhandling
2. Perimeter shooting
3. Finishing with his right hand

I expect to see marked improvement in these areas, given that is what he needs to work on in order to get drafted. If he can improve the ballhandling even just a smidge, he could help out a ton in this one area that a lot of us feel we're sorely lacking. They did have him bring the ball up plenty last year and he wasn't dreadful at it. As much as he had the ball in his hands (which was a ton, probably nearly EVERY possession I would guess), he only had a 14% turnover rate. For comparison's sake, turnover rates for last season's Bob Cousy award finalists:

Markquis Nowell 19%
Tyler Kolek 18%
Boo Buie 13%
Jalen Pickett 13%
Yuri Collins 25%
Interesting stat.
Feedback was pretty obvious.

FWIW we seemed to go long periods of time where we did not get him any touches in places to drive or attack close outs or shoot.
He was terribly under utilized.
 
#155      

Big Jack

Decatur
Interesting stat.
Feedback was pretty obvious.

FWIW we seemed to go long periods of time where we did not get him any touches in places to drive or attack close outs or shoot.
He was terribly under utilized.
I would agree but then again I blame a lot of that inability on our players on the floor. I am not a BB savant but imho we clogged the lane way to much with our lack of movement at times. Of course that happens when you have to many guys willing to settle for chucking 3s. Smart teams sag off and thus the lane becomes a congested mess. Making the other team respect their man and getting better movement from DD and co hawk would make it a lot easier for TSJ to drive.
 
#156      
we made a lot of jokes over the last summer of Underwood's obsession with wings. Is the staff not concerned, especially after last year, that subpar PG could hurt the team? If this change occurs our roster would be

Bigs: Dainja
Big wings: Hawkins, Hansberry, Guerrier
Wings: Shannon, Reeves, Goode, Domask, Rodgers, Johnson, DGL, Sencire
PG: Williams

You could maybe put Hansberry in as a big instead of a big wing, but I don't expect him to be on the block with his back to the basket a ton. You could maybe put Johnson as a PG/wing, he'd have to be, especially with the question marks with Williams.

The big men in the Big Ten will not be as good as they've been in past years, but if anything happens to Dainja or Williams in this scenario, we are just a team of wings and a Fr trying to learn PG. I also think Johnson is less likely than Reeves to boot, but maybe we're taking all that money set aside for Dennis and throwing it at him.
I think that we would slide DGL to backup PG.
 
#157      

Big Jack

Decatur
I would love to see us add another experienced PG. But I would honestly love to see more Ty at that spot. I honestly believe his ball handling is sufficient and he has the size to abuse some smaller PGs. Yes his free throw shooting would need to improve but he is very good at backing down a defender. Can he run the offense? Can he get the ball to shooters or players in the right spots? No better chance to see and find out then a road trip to Spain this summer. Give him the keys and see what happens.
 
#159      
I would love to see us add another experienced PG. But I would honestly love to see more Ty at that spot. I honestly believe his ball handling is sufficient and he has the size to abuse some smaller PGs. Yes his free throw shooting would need to improve but he is very good at backing down a defender. Can he run the offense? Can he get the ball to shooters or players in the right spots? No better chance to see and find out then a road trip to Spain this summer. Give him the keys and see what happens.
Not a bad idea to try him out on the Spain trip as I think Williams probably is not available for that trip given his injury recovery timing. But, looking at the situation overall, it is very concerning that the team expected to challenge for a BigTen title might be in a position to try out a guy that to my knowledge has no previous PG experience and established himself last year as a fierce rebounder with a nose for the ball underneath. With the Harmon eligibility in question, that leave DGL as the backup? Not an ideal situation for a team trying to establish chemistry for a run at the B10 and hopefully more. Hopefully someone steps up (TSJ? Harmon?) and eases concerns at the position. There are many examples of great teams in the past that have not had a prototypical point but have had great success.
 
#160      
Not a bad idea to try him out on the Spain trip as I think Williams probably is not available for that trip given his injury recovery timing. But, looking at the situation overall, it is very concerning that the team expected to challenge for a BigTen title might be in a position to try out a guy that to my knowledge has no previous PG experience and established himself last year as a fierce rebounder with a nose for the ball underneath. With the Harmon eligibility in question, that leave DGL as the backup? Not an ideal situation for a team trying to establish chemistry for a run at the B10 and hopefully more. Hopefully someone steps up (TSJ? Harmon?) and eases concerns at the position. There are many examples of great teams in the past that have not had a prototypical point but have had great success.
I don’t see this happening but Imagine 5’11” Braden Smith trying to guard Ty Rodgers.
 
#161      
we made a lot of jokes over the last summer of Underwood's obsession with wings. Is the staff not concerned, especially after last year, that subpar PG could hurt the team? If this change occurs our roster would be

Bigs: Dainja
Big wings: Hawkins, Hansberry, Guerrier
Wings: Shannon, Reeves, Goode, Domask, Rodgers, Johnson, DGL, Sencire
PG: Williams

You could maybe put Hansberry in as a big instead of a big wing, but I don't expect him to be on the block with his back to the basket a ton. You could maybe put Johnson as a PG/wing, he'd have to be, especially with the question marks with Williams.

The big men in the Big Ten will not be as good as they've been in past years, but if anything happens to Dainja or Williams in this scenario, we are just a team of wings and a Fr trying to learn PG. I also think Johnson is less likely than Reeves to boot, but maybe we're taking all that money set aside for Dennis and throwing it at him.
Hansberry is absolutely a Big. Watch him play. He doesn't move nearly well enough to play on the perimeter. There's a reason everyone lists him as either a C or PF.

The guys you lists as Big Wings are all Bigs in college basketball. While Guerrier has played some SF, he wasn't nearly as good there as when he played the 4.
 
#162      
I don’t see this happening but Imagine 5’11” Braden Smith trying to guard Ty Rodgers.
Love Ty, and he could be great this year, but Rodgers really needs those around him to be able to hit 3's if he's going to be some form of PG for us. Teams will sag off of him and help out in the lane if we shoot like we did last year. Hard to copy PSU and Pickett from last year if Rodgers and his teammates can't shoot it.
 
#163      
we made a lot of jokes over the last summer of Underwood's obsession with wings. Is the staff not concerned, especially after last year, that subpar PG could hurt the team? If this change occurs our roster would be

Bigs: Dainja
Big wings: Hawkins, Hansberry, Guerrier
Wings: Shannon, Reeves, Goode, Domask, Rodgers, Johnson, DGL, Sencire
PG: Williams

You could maybe put Hansberry in as a big instead of a big wing, but I don't expect him to be on the block with his back to the basket a ton. You could maybe put Johnson as a PG/wing, he'd have to be, especially with the question marks with Williams.

The big men in the Big Ten will not be as good as they've been in past years, but if anything happens to Dainja or Williams in this scenario, we are just a team of wings and a Fr trying to learn PG. I also think Johnson is less likely than Reeves to boot, but maybe we're taking all that money set aside for Dennis and throwing it at him.
Well DGL is a 6 foot PG. and you can throw Johnson in the camp that can play PG too
 
#172      

theNewGuy

Dallas, TX
Just to inject a little positivity, the draft notes on TSJ indicate he has 3 main things he needs to improve:

1. Ballhandling
2. Perimeter shooting
3. Finishing with his right hand

I expect to see marked improvement in these areas, given that is what he needs to work on in order to get drafted. If he can improve the ballhandling even just a smidge, he could help out a ton in this one area that a lot of us feel we're sorely lacking. They did have him bring the ball up plenty last year and he wasn't dreadful at it. As much as he had the ball in his hands (which was a ton, probably nearly EVERY possession I would guess), he only had a 14% turnover rate. For comparison's sake, turnover rates for last season's Bob Cousy award finalists:

Markquis Nowell 19%
Tyler Kolek 18%
Boo Buie 13%
Jalen Pickett 13%
Yuri Collins 25%
I think this is a great point but I think it's less about turnovers and more about predictability.

I didn't play basketball growing up so I'm not going to pretend to really know much... but there was a lot of talk last year about not being able to set pick and rolls.
If you have a average true PG who can run say 10 different offensive packages effectively versus an Elite player who is not a true PG who can run 4 different offensive packages effectively, the offense run by the true point guard will be much harder to defend and often times more successful.

I played hockey so the only times we had set offense was on the powerplay and if you couldn't adapt to how the penalty killers played, then you wouldn't have any success.

EDIT: This isn't really critiquing the poster but kinda went on my own point if TSJ has to play point guard.
 
#173      
I think this is a great point but I think it's less about turnovers and more about predictability.

I didn't play basketball growing up so I'm not going to pretend to really know much... but there was a lot of talk last year about not being able to set pick and rolls.
If you have a average true PG who can run say 10 different offensive packages effectively versus an Elite player who is not a true PG who can run 4 different offensive packages effectively, the offense run by the true point guard will be much harder to defend and often times more successful.

I played hockey so the only times we had set offense was on the powerplay and if you couldn't adapt to how the penalty killers played, then you wouldn't have any success.

EDIT: This isn't really critiquing the poster but kinda went on my own point if TSJ has to play point guard.
You need it all.
Shooters, ball screen action ability, penetrators. Missing any of those and you become limited.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/feature...d-role-hack-sticking-two-guys-in-the-corners/
 
#175      
Interesting stat.
Feedback was pretty obvious.

FWIW we seemed to go long periods of time where we did not get him any touches in places to drive or attack close outs or shoot.
He was terribly under utilized.
I think he got passive at times.

I think one of his biggest things is to learn to play with some pace and use his size. He's very quick but it's sometimes all just one speed and he can get out of control going to the basket.

He needs to learn to change speeds, come into the lane a bit more under control, and utilitize his size and strength.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.